Assessing Territorial Impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese Case

References

• Abaza, H., Bisset, R. & Sadler, B. (2004) Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach (New York: Frank Cass, UNEP).
   Google Scholar
• Abreu, D. (2005) Transportes aéreos e marítimos, in: Círculo de Leitores & C. A. Medeiros (Eds) Geografia de Portugal, vol. 3, Actividades Económicas e Espaço Geográfico, pp. 354–365 (Lisboa: Circulo de Leitores).
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (1997) Genesis of a Western European spatial policy? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(2), pp. 158–167. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9701700206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. & Tomaney, J. (1995) The challenge of cohesion, in: A. Amin & J. Tomaney (Eds) Behind the Myth of European Union: Prospects for Cohesion, pp. 11–47 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Anjaneyulu, Y. & Manickam, V. (2007) Environmental Impact Assessment Methodologies, 2nd ed. (Hyderabad: BS Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, L. (1999) El desarrollo local y los fondos estructurales, Ciudad y Território, Estudios Territoriales, XXXI(122), pp. 735–735.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H. & Taylor, J. (2000) Regional Economics and Policy (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J. & Michie, R. (1994) Strengthening economic and social cohesion? The revision of the structural funds, Regional Studies, 28(8), pp. 789–796. doi: 10.1080/00343409412331348676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J. & Wren, C. (2006) Evaluation of European Union cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges, Regional Studies, 40(2), pp. 143–153. doi: 10.1080/00343400600600454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2003) Regional policy experience in Southern Italy, in: B. Funck & L. Pizzati (Eds) European Integration, Regional Policy, and Growth, pp. 129–134 (Washington: The World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Bateira, J. & Ferreira, L. (2002) Questioning EU cohesion policy in Portugal, European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(4), pp. 297–314. doi: 10.1177/096977640200900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S. (2006) Principles and purposes of European Union cohesion policy evaluation, Regional Studies, 40(2), pp. 179–188. doi: 10.1080/00343400600600504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. & Vanclay, F. (2003) The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment. Conceptual and Methodological Advances (Cheltenham: Edward Elgars).
   Google Scholar
• Bizer, K., Lechner, S. & Für, M. (Eds) (2010) The European Impact Assessment and the Environment (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, C. (2010) A política ambiental de Portugal no espaço europeu: atitudes e desafios, Europa Novas Fronteiras. Portugal—25 anos de Integração Europeia, 26/27, pp. 177–182.
   Google Scholar
• Boura, I. & Jacinto, R. (1992) Evolução da política regional e a sua incidência nas regiões portuguesas, Actas do VI Colóquio ibérico de Geografia, pp. 409–420 (Oporto).
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2006) Territorial impact assessment—TIA: A methodological proposal, Italian Journal of Regional Science (Scienze Regionali), 5(2), pp. 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, A. & Espasa, M. (2003) Do structural actions contribute to reduced disparities in the European Union, in: B. Funck & L. Pizzati (Eds) European Integration, Regional Policy, and Growth, pp. 167–178 (Washington: The World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Ries, R. & Wangb, Y. (2011) The quantification of the embodied impacts of construction projects on energy, environment, and society based on I–OLCA, Energy Policy, 39(10), pp. 6321–6330. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiabrando, R., Fabrizio, E. & Garnero, G. (2009) The territorial and landscape impacts of photovoltaic systems: Definition of impacts and assessment of the glare risk, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), pp. 2441–2451. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, C. (2006) Transportes e Infraestruturas de transportes, in: Edições Almedina, SA (Ed.) A economia portuguesa 20 anos após a adesão, II série, N°1, Colecção Económicas, pp. 235–281 (Coimbra: Almedina).
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R. (2009) Undermining the principle of concentration? European Union regional policy and the socio-economic disadvantage of European regions, Regional Studies, 43(1), pp. 111–133. doi: 10.1080/00343400801932276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. & Marques, R. (2012) O Estado e as Parcerias Público-Privadas (Lisbon: Edições Sílabo).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. & Polverari, L. (2011) Financial accountability and European Union cohesion policy, Regional Studies, 45(5), pp. 695–706. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.529118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Fuente, A. (2003) Does cohesion policy work? Some general considerations and evidence from Spain, in: B. Funck & L. Pizzati (Eds) European Integration, Regional Policy, and Growth, pp. 153–166 (Washington: The World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• DGOTDU (1997) Sistema Urbano nacional—Cidades Médias e Dinâmicas Territoriais, Volume 1, Direcção Geral do Ordenamento do Território e Desenvolvimento Urbano, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• DGOTDU (2002) Sistema Urbano nacional—Síntese, Direcção Geral do Ordenamento do Território e Desenvolvimento Urbano, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• DPP (2002) QCA II Relatório da Verificação EX-POST do Princípio da Adicionalidade, Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento, Ministério do Planeamento, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Ebel, A. & Davitashvili, T. (2005) Air, Water and Soil Quality Modeling for Risk and Impact Assessment, NATO Security Through Science Series, Series C: Environmental Security (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• EC (1996) Methodologies for Transport Impact Assessment, Transport Research APAS, Strategic Transport, European Commission, Directorate-General Transport, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EC (1999a) MEANS—Evaluation Socio-Economic Programmes—Evaluating Design and Management, Vol. 1 (Luxemburg: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• EC (1999b) European Spatial Development Perspective—ESDP. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union (Luxembourg: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2007) Growing Regions, Growing Europe. Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2008) EVALSED—The Resource for the Evaluation for Socio-Economic Development (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2009) Impact Assessment Guidelines (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2010a) Lisbon Treaty, Official Journal of the European Union, C83(1), pp. 13–388. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:FULL:EN:PDF (accessed 29 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2010b) Investing in Europe's Future: Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, November 2010, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (2010c) Evaluating Regional Policy Insights and Results, Panorama 33, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (2010d) Impact Assessment of the SME-Specific Measures FP5 and FP6 (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2011) Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Investing in Growth and Jobs (Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Policy).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2012) Connecting Smart and Sustainable Growth through Smart Specialization, Practical Guide for ERDF Managing Authorities, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ECA (2010) Impact Assessments in the EU Institutions: Do they Support Decision-Making? European Court of Auditors, Special Report No 3, 2010, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON (2006) Territory Matters for Competitiveness and Cohesion, Facets of Regional Diversity and Potentials in Europe, Synthesis report III, results by Autumn 2006, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 1.1.4 (2006) The Spatial Effects of Demographic Trends and Migration, Final Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 1.3.1 (2006) The Spatial Effects and Management of Natural and Technological Hazards in Europe, Final Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 1.3.3 (2006) The Role and Spatial Effects of Cultural Heritage and Identity, Final Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.1.1 (2005) Territorial Impact of EU Transport and TEN Policies, Final Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.1.3 (2006) The Territorial Impact of CAP and Rural Development Policy, Project Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.1.4 (2005) Territorial Trends of Energy Services and Networks and Territorial Impact of EU Energy Policy, A Draft Final Report to the ESPON Coordination, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.1.5 (2006) Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy, Final Report, ESPON Coordination, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.2.1 (2005) The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds, Project Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.2.2 (2005) Pre-Accession Aid Impact Analysis, Final Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.2.3 (2005) Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds in Urban Areas, A Draft Final Report to the ESPON Coordination, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.3.1 (2006) Application on Effects of the ESDP in the Member States, Project Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.3.2 (2006) Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level, Final Report. May 2006, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 2.4.1 (2006) Territorial Trends and Policy Impacts in the Field of EU Environmental Policy, Final Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 3.1 (2005) Integrated Tools for European Spatial Development, Final Report, Part A, Scientific and policy oriented conclusions of ESPON results until September 2004, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 3.2 (2006) Spatial Scenarios and Orientations in Relation to the ESDP and Cohesion Policy, Volume 5—Territorial Impact Assessment, Final Report, October 2006, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON ARTS (2012) Assessment of Regional and Territorial Sensitivity, Applied Research 2013/1/17, Final Report, Version 30/07/2012, Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON ATLAS (2006) ESPON Atlas. Mapping the Structure of the European Territory, October 2006, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON CLIMATE (2011) Climate Change and Territorial Effects on Regions and Local Economies, Applied Research 2013/1/4, Draft Final report, Version 25/2/2011, Summary Report, Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON EATIA (2012) ESPON and Territorial Impact Assessment, Targeted Analysis 2013/2/9, Final Report, Version 29/06/2012, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON TIGER (2011) Territorial Impact of Globalization for Europe and its Regions, Applied Research Project 2013/1/1, Interim Report, Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON TIPTAP (2010) Territorial Impact Package for Transport and Agricultural Policies, Applied Research Project 2013/1/6 Final Report—Part A and B, The ESPON 2013 Programme, Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2006) From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy, Regional Studies, 40(6), pp. 667–678. doi: 10.1080/00343400600868937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. & Peyrony, J. (2011) Cohesion policy contributing to territorial cohesion—future scenarios, European Journal of Spatial Development, Referred article 43, September, 2011. Available at http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed43.pdf (accessed 9 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ferrão, J. (2003) A Emergência de Estratégias Transnacionais de Ordenamento do Território na União Europeia: Reimaginar o Espaço Europeu para Criar Novas Formas de Governança Territorial, GeoINOVA, 7, pp. 11–37.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2005) Cities and the Creative Class (London: Routlege).
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J. (2010) As infra-estruturas do território como factor de desenvolvimento económico e social, in: Princípia (Ed.) Europa Novas Fronteiras. Portugal—25 anos de Integração Europeia, 26/27, pp. 85–91 (Parede, Portugal: Princípia). Available at http://infoeuropa.eurocid.pt/opac/?func=service&doc_library=CIE01&doc_number=000044015&line_number=0001&func_code=WEB-FULL&service_type=MEDIA.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J. & Simões, J. M. (2005) Planeamento de Âmbito Regional, in: Círculo de Leitores & C. A. Medeiros (Eds) Geografia de Portugal, vol. 4, Planeamento e Ordenamento do Território, pp. 207–242 (Lisboa: Circulo de Leitores).
   Google Scholar
• George, C. (2010) Proportionate impact assessment: Discretion, formalism, and the undefined responsibilities of European decision-making, in: K. Bizer, S. Lechner & M. Führ (Eds) The European Impact Assessment and the Environment, pp. 103–117 (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• George, C. & Kirkpatrick, C. (Eds) (2007) Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development European Practice and Experience (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited).
   Google Scholar
• Golobič, M. & Marot, N. (2011) Territorial impact assessment: Integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies, Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(3), pp. 163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosse, T. (2006) An evaluation of the regional policy system in Poland: Challenges and threats emerging from participation in the EU's cohesion policy euro-commentary: An evaluation of the regional policy system in Poland: Challenges, European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(2), pp. 151–165. doi: 10.1177/0969776406058965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helming, K., Pérez-Soba, M. & Tabbush, P. (2007) Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes (New York: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W. (2006) Evaluation of European Union cohesion policy: Window-dressing, formal exercise or coordinated learning process? Regional Studies, 40(2), pp. 277–280. doi: 10.1080/00343400600600751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelbrunner, R. (2005) Process monitoring of impacts—proposal for a new approach to monitor the implementation of structural fund programmes, Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, no 10, pp. 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• IGFSE (2009a) Contributo do Fundo Social Europeu para a Formação dos Activos Empregados, Estudo de Avaliação integrado na colecção de estudos: temas fundo social europeu, Instituto de Gestão do Fundo Social Europeu, I.P., Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• IGFSE (2009b) Intervenção do FSE e Desenvolvimento do Potencial Humano em Portugal, Estudo de Avaliação integrado na colecção de estudos: temas fundo social europeu, Instituto de Gestão do Fundo Social Europeu, I.P., Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• IGFSE (2011) Síntese da intervenção do FSE no QREN, Informação reportada a 31 de Dezembro de 2011, Instituto de Gestão do Fundo Social Europeu, I.P., Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Loiseau, E., Junqua, G., Roux, P. & Bellon-Maurel, V. (2012) Environmental assessment of a territory: An overview of existing tools and methods, Journal of Environmental Management, 112, pp. 213–225. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030147971200388X (accessed 9 April 2013) doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, M. (2006) O desenvolvimento dos recursos humanos em Portugal nos últimos 20 anos, in A economia portuguesa 20 anos após a adesão, II série, N°1, Colecção Económicas, Almedina, Coimbra, pp. 327–357.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe, S. (2003) The Economic and Social Impacts of E-Commerce (London: Idea Group Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Mairate, A. (2006) The “added value” of European Union Cohesion policy, Regional Studies, 40(2), pp. 167–177. doi: 10.1080/00343400600600496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAOTDR (2007) Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional—Portugal 2007–2013, Observatório do QCA III, Ministério do Ambiente, do Ordenamento do Território e do Desenvolvimento Rural, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, W. (2009) Importações e Exportações Portuguesas de Produtos Energéticos, BMEP (4)—2009, GEE, GPEARI, Ministério da Economia, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Tyler, P. (2006) Evaluating the impact of the structural funds on objective 1 regions: An exploratory discussion, Regional Studies, 40(2), pp. 201–210. doi: 10.1080/00343400600600546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2010) (Re)defining the Euroregion concept, European Planning Studies, 19(1), pp. 141–158. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.531920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2011a) Euro-meso-macro: The new regions in Iberian and European space, Regional Studies. Available at http://rsa.informaworld.com/srsa/content~db=all~content=a941630679~frm=abslink (accessed 3 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2011b) Efeito Barreira e Cooperação Transfronteiriça na Raia Ibérica, Colecção Iberografias, n° 18, Centro de Estudos Ibéricos (Lisbon: Âncora Editora).
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2012) A coesão territorial. O conceito e o seu significado na Política de Coesão da UE, NEST online N1-2012 (Lisbon: CEG–IGOT, Lisbon University).
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2013) Efeitos e Impactos territoriais da Política de Coesão da UE, Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning—IGOT, First Part, Lisbon University, Lisbon. Available at http://ww3.fl.ul.pt//pessoais/Eduardo_Medeiros/docs/PDTEM.pdf (accessed 11 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Molle, W. (2007) European Cohesion Policy (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, Á. (2006) A Política Energética Portuguesa—Passado, Presente e Futuro, A economia portuguesa 20 anos após a adesão, II série, N°1, Colecção Económicas, pp. 215–234 (Coimbra: Almedina).
   Google Scholar
• MPAT (1995) Fundos Estruturais, 10 anos, Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território, Secretaria de Estado do Planeamento e Desenvolvimento Regional, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, H. (2011) Uma estratégia para Portugal (Alfragide: Lua de Papel).
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P. & Van Pelt, M. (1989) Spatial impact analysis in developing countries: Method and application, International Regional Science Review, 12(2), pp. 211–228. doi: 10.1177/016001768901200206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2010) Guidance on Sustainability Impact Assessment (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).
   Google Scholar
• Potluka, O. (2010) Impact of EU Cohesion Policy in Central Europe (Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag).
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, C. (2005) Produção e consumo de energia, in: Círculo de Leitores & C. A. Medeiros (Eds) Geografia de Portugal, vol. 3, Actividades Económicas e Espaço Geográfico, pp. 174–183 (Lisbon: Circulo de Leitores).
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, C. & Ventura, J. (1999) A energia solar em Portugal: potencialidades e diferenciação regional, in: Edições Colibri & Associação Portuguesa de Geógrafos (APG) (Eds) Actas do III Congresso de geografia Portuguesa, Porto, Setembro de 1997, pp. 453–461 (Lisbon: Edições Colibri e Associação Portuguesa de Geógrafos).
   Google Scholar
• Ranci, C. (2010) Competitiveness and social cohesion in Western European cities, Urban Studies, 48(13), pp. 2789–2804. doi: 10.1177/0042098010394688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, O. (2012) O ensino da Geografia (Oporto: Porto Editora).
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Tselios, V. (2011) Mapping the European regional educational distribution, European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4), pp. 358–374. doi: 10.1177/0969776411399345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romão, A. (2006) A economia portuguesa 20 anos após a adesão, II série, N°1, Colecção Económicas (Coimbra: Almedina).
   Google Scholar
• Romero, A. (2011) Entrepreneurship and Cohesion Policy: Smart Specialization (Madrid: Cómaras, Fundación INCYDE).
   Google Scholar
• Schlumpf, C., Pahl-Wostl, C., Schönborn, A., Jaeger, C. & Imbodem, D. (2001) IMPACTS—An information tool for citizens to assess impacts of climate change from a regional perspective, Climatic Change, 51(2), pp. 199–241. doi: 10.1023/A:1012228218492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. & Storper, M. (2003) Regions, globalization, development, Regional Studies, 37(6–7), pp. 579–593. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000108697a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, D. & Diez, J. R. (2011) The impact of academic mobility on the creation of localized intangible assets, Regional Studies, 46(10), pp. 1319–1332. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.571241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. & Martens, H. (2005) The Nordic Model: The Nordic Model: A Recipe for European Success? EPC working paper no 20, European Policy Centre, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Séchet, R. (1996) Espaces et Pauvreté. La géographie interrogée (Montréal: L'Harmattan).
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg, R., Vanclay, F. & Van Schooten, M. (2003) Integrating Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment. Conceptual and Methodological Advances (Cheltenham: Edward Elgars).
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, B. (2004) Renewable Energy. Its Physics, Engineering, Use, Environmental Impacts, Economy and Planning Aspects, 3rd ed. (London: Elsevier Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tscherning, K., König, H., Birthe, S., Helming, K. & Sieber, S. (2007) Ex-ante impact assessments (IA) in the European Commission—an overview, in: K. Helming, M. Pérez-Soba & P. Tabbush (Eds) Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes, pp. 17–33 (New York: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Vale, M. (2005) Especificidades da industrialização portuguesa, in: Círculo de Leitores & C. A. Medeiros (Eds) Geografia de Portugal, vol. 3, Actividades Económicas e Espaço Geográfico, pp. 187–193 (Lisbon: Circulo de Leitores).
   Google Scholar
• Wathern, P. (Ed.) (1988) Environmental Impact Assessment. Theory and Practice (London: Routlege).
   Google Scholar