Romanian Spatial Planning System: Post-Communist Dynamics of Change and Europeanization Processes

References

• Adams, N., Cotella, G. & Nunes, R. (Eds.) (2011) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Altrock, U., Guentner, S., Huning, S. & Peters, D. (2006) Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States: From Adjustment to Reinvention (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. & Waterhout, B. (2008) The Europeanization of planning, in: A. Faludi (Ed) European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 227–250 (Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Bubulete (2010) In the debate: Theme of the day. Two decades of urban and territorial planning, 1990–2010, Urbanismul Serie Noua, 7–8(2), pp. 142–157.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (1997) The European Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2001) White Paper on European Governance, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• CEMAT (2007) The Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a more Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, W. (2010) Introduction: Contemporary Romanian politics, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(1), pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CULTPLAN (2008) Cultural Differences in European Co-operation. Learning from INTERREG Practice. Available at www.cultplan.org (accessed 28 January 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Dan, N. (2008) Bucuresti: reusite si nereusite ale ONGistilor urbanisti. Available at http://urbanblogg.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/reusite-si-nereusite-ale-ongistilor-urbanisti/ (accessed 5 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. W. E., Edwards, D., Hooper, A. J. & Punter, J. V. (1989) Comparative study, in: H. W. E. Davies (Ed) Planning control in western Europe, pp. 409–442 (London: HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Derer, P. (2010) In the debate: Theme of the Day. Two Decades of Urban and Territorial Planning, 1990–2010. Urbanismul Serie Noua 7–8, pp. 142–157.
   Google Scholar
• Dobre, A. M. (2010) Europeanization and new patterns of multi-level governance in Romania, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(1), pp. 59–70. doi: 10.1080/14683851003606838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragoman, D. (2011) Regional inequalities, decentralisation and the performance of local governments in post-Communist Romania, Local Government Studies, 37(6), pp. 647–669. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.623010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Stead, D. & Zonneveld, W. (2007) The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation, Planning, Practice & Research, 22(3), pp. 291–307. doi: 10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C. & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2008) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion (Brussels: Turning territorial diversity into strength).
   Google Scholar
• Elisei, P. (2009) The use of ERDF (European Regional Development Fund) through integrated plans in Romania: real needs of urban renewal and the distant strategies of EU policy/politics makers. Proceedings to the International Scientific Conference “Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance”, Belgrade, Serbia, December 2009.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON (2007a) Project 2.3.1. Application and Effects of the ESDP in the Member States. Final Report. ESPON, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON (2007b) Project 2.3.2. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. Final Report. ESPON, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009) A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The “Territorial Agenda of the European Union” and the “First Action Programme”, Progress in Planning, 71(1), pp. 1–42. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2005) Globalization and the emerging culture of planning, Progress in Planning, 64(3), pp. 183–234. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrea, S. (2010) In the debate: Theme of the day. Two decades of urban and territorial planning, 1990–2010, Urbanismul Serie Noua, 7–8(2), pp. 142–157.
   Google Scholar
• German Presidency (2007) Territorial Agenda of the European union: Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions (Leipzig: Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion).
   Google Scholar
• Getimis, P. (2012) Comparing spatial planning systems and planning cultures in Europe. The need for a multi-scalar approach, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 25–40. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
   Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, G. (2012) The Europeanization of national planning: Explaining the causes and the potentials of change, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 117–135. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661195
   Google Scholar
• GoR—Government of Romania (1999) National Sustainable Development Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• GoR (2000) National Programme for the Accession to the EU.
   Google Scholar
• GoR (2001) National Programme for the Accession to the EU.
   Google Scholar
• GoR (2005) The National Development Plan 2007–2013, Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• GoR (2007) The National Strategic Reference Framework 2007–2013.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2001) How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity, Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), pp. 1013–31. doi: 10.1080/13501760110098323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianos, I. & Pascariu, G. (2012) Inceputurile politicii regionale in Romania, Urbanismul Serie Noua, 11(1), pp. 74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J. & Othengrafen, F. (2009) Spatial planning and culture—symbiosis for a better understanding of cultural differences in planning systems, traditions and practices, in: J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds) Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 283–299 (Farnham: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A. (2006) Europeanisation of public policy, in: J. Richardson (Ed) European Union—Power and Policy Making, 3rd ed., pp. 55–71 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Maier, K. (2012) Europeanization and changing planning in East-Central Europe: An Easterner's view, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 137–154. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661596
   Google Scholar
• MDPWH—Ministry for Development Public Works and Housing (2008) Strategic Concept of Territorial Development 2030.
   Google Scholar
• MPWSP—Ministry for Public Works and Spatial Planning (2000) Reforma si Lucrarile publice in Romania ultimilor ani 1997–2000. Universalia, Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2006) Europeanisation without decommunization: a case of elite conversion, in: David Phinnemore (Ed) The EU & Romania. Accession and Beyond, pp. 17–28 (London: Federal Trust for Education and Research).
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi (2009) Romania. Outsmarting The EU's smart power, in: M. Emerson & R. Youngs (Eds) Democracy's Plight in the European Neighbourhood: Struggling transitions and proliferating dynasties, pp. 41–49. CEPS Paperbacks. October 2009 (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Muresan, R. (2011) RABO sau cum se face lobby in Romania. Available at http://www.businessmagazin.ro/analize/imobiliare/rabo-sau-cum-se-face-lobby-in-romania-8179531 (accessed 4 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, Social models and learning, disP, 172(1), pp. 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. & Thornley, A. (1996) Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, C. (2006) Reforming regional governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or domestic politics as usual? East European Politics and Societies, 20(2), pp. 219–253. doi: 10.1177/0888325404271286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parau, C. (2009) Impaling Dracula: How EU Accession empowered civil society in Romania, West European Politics, 32(1), pp. 119–141. doi: 10.1080/01402380802509917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parau, C. & Bains, J. (2008) Europeanization as empowerment of civil society: All smoke and mirrors? From national to international linkages, in: W. A. Maloney & J. W. van Deth (Eds) Civil Society and Governance in Europe, pp. 109–126 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Pascariu, G. (2010a) Structura si Dinamica Sistemelor De Asezari Umane in Procesul De Planificare Teritoriala (Bucharest: Bucharest University).
   Google Scholar
• Pascariu, G. (2010b) In the debate: Theme of the day. Two decades of Urban and territorial planning, 1990–2010, Urbanismul Serie Noua, 7–8(2), pp. 142–157.
   Google Scholar
• Pascariu, G. (2012a) 15 Years of Urban Education in Romania, in: Proceedings to the 1st International Conference on Architecture & Urban Design, Tirana,  pnEPOKA.
   Google Scholar
• Pascariu, G. (2012b) Overview of Romanian planning evolution, in: Proceedings of AESOP 26t h Annual Congress, Ankara, METU.
   Google Scholar
• Petrisor, A.-I. (2010) The theory and practice of urban and spatial planning in Romania, In Serbian Architectural Journal, 711(2), pp. 139–154.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2003) The Europeanization of public policy, in: K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds) The Politics of Europeanization, pp. 27–56 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Radoslav, R. (2010) In the debate: Theme of the Day. Two decades of urban and territorial planning, 1990–2010, Urbanismul Serie Noua, 7–8(2), pp. 142–157.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. (2010) Territorial cohesion discourses: Hegemonic strategic concepts in European spatial planning, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3), pp. 397–416. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2010.500135
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. & Van den Broeck, P. (2012) The social construction of planning systems. A strategic-relational institutionalist approach, Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), pp. 41–61. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661179
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2006) The Romanian economy since 1989, in: David Phinnemore (Ed) The EU & Romania. Accession and Beyond, pp. 29–37 (London: Federal Trust for Education and Research).
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. & Nadin, V. (2009) Planning cultures between models of society and planning systems, in: J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds) Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 283–299 (Farnham: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Turnock, D. (1987) Romania, in: Andrew H. Dawson (Ed) Planning in Eastern Europe, pp. 229–274 (New York: St. Martin's Press).
   Google Scholar
• Turnock, D. (2007) Aspects of Independent Romania's Economic History with Particular Reference to Transition for EU Accession (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Vrabete, M. (2008) The Romania 2030 spatial development strategic concept—a trigger for the reform in spatial planning, Romanian Review of Regional Studies, IV(2), pp. 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2008) Reshaping Planning with Culture (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar