Social enterprises in regional innovation systems: a review of Finnish regional strategies

References

• Alvord, S. H., Brown, D. L., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282. doi:10.1177/0021886304266847
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86. doi:10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 131–140. doi:10.1080/09654319808720451
   Google Scholar
• Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5/6), 373–403. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.577242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2003). Toward a relational economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 117–144. doi:10.1093/jeg/3.2.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (Eds.). (2001). The emergence of social enterprise. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (Eds.). (1998). Regional innovation systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brouard, F., & Larivet, S. (2011, June 1–3). Social enterprises: Definitions and boundaries. Paper presented at ANSER-ARES Conference, Alberta, Canada. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.anser-ares.ca/files/conf11/papers/Brouard-Larivet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campi, S., Defourny, J., & Grégoire, O. (2006). Multiple goals and multiple stakeholder structure: The governance of social enterprises. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprises at the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp. 29–49). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chell, E., Nicolopoulou, K., & Karataş-Özkan, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: International and innovation perspectives. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(6), 485–493. doi:10.1080/08985626.2010.488396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382. doi:10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: Origins of the concept. In H.-J. Braczyk, P. N. Cooke, & M. Heindreich (Eds.), Regional innovation systems (pp. 2–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2001a). Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.945
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2001b). From technopoles to regional innovation systems: The evolution of localized technology development policy. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 21–40. Retrieved from http://cjrs-rcsr.org/archives/24-1/COOKE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2007). To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms. European Planning Studies, 15(2), 179–194. doi:10.1080/09654310601078671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2008). Regional innovation systems, clean technology & Jacobian cluster-platform policies. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1(1), 23–45. doi:10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012a). The increasing use of dramaturgy in regional innovation practice. In H. Melkas & V. Harmaakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications (pp. 277–301). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012b). From clusters to platform policies in regional development. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1415–1424. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.680741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2014). Systems of innovation and the learning region. In M. M. Fischer & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional science (pp. 457–474). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 475–491. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. doi:10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defourny, J. (2004). Introduction. From third sector to social enterprise. In C. Borzaga & J. Defourny (Eds.), The emergence of social enterprises (pp. 1–28). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining social enterprise. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp. 3–26). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). Conceptions of social enterprise in Europe: A comparative perspective with the United States. In B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective (pp. 71–90). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• DeSimone, L. D., & Popoff, F. (2000). Eco-efficiency: The business link to sustainable development. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and undersolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997). Introduction. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations (pp. 1–35). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., Luukkonen, T., & Sotarauta, M. (2009). Broad-based innovation policy. In K. Aiginger, D. Breznitz, C. Edquist, G. Murray, G. Ottaviano, R. Veugelers, … M. Maula (Eds.), Evaluation of the Finnish national innovation system – full report (pp. 11–69). Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy. Retrieved from www.evaluation.fi
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from the Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011, October). Research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation. Cohesion policy 2014–2020. Factsheet. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/smart_specialisation_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2012). Work programme 2013. Cooperation: Theme 8, socio-economic sciences and humanities. European Commission C 4536 of 09 July 2012. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portalplus/static/docs/calls/fp7/common/32764-annex_11_to_the_decision_ssh_for_cap_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Employment and the Economy. (2011). Yhteiskunnallisen yrityksen toimintamallin kehittäminen, Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja 4/2011. Helsinki: Author ( in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, P. (2010). People, planet, profit: How to embrace sustainability for innovation and business growth. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2011). The complexity of innovation: A relational turn. Progress in Human Geography, 35(3), 328–344. doi:10.1177/0309132510376257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2009). Understanding ‘smart specialisation’. In D. Pontikakis, D. Kyriakou, & R. van Bavel (Eds.), The question of R&D specialisation: Perspectives and policy implications (pp. 14–26). Seville: JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialization. From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation (MTEI Working Paper 2011–001). Lausanne: EPFL – MTEI.
   Google Scholar
• Foxon, T., & Pearson, P. (2008). Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: Some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), S148–S161. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V. (2006). Regional development platform method as a tool for regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 1085–1104. doi:10.1080/09654310600852399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., Tura, T., & Melkas, H. (2011). Regional innovation platforms. In P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), The handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 400–410). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., & Uotila, T. (2006). Building regional visionary capability. Futures research in resource based regional development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 778–792. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., & Uotila, T. (2012). Innovaatiopolitiikan meta-analyysi: Innovaatioympäristön uudet toimintatavat ja alustat kasvun kehittämisessä. Helsinki: Tekes ( in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, G., & Pace, C. (2006). Value-creating ecologies: Understanding next generation business systems. Foresight, 8(1), 55–65. doi:10.1108/14636680610647147
   Google Scholar
• Heckl, E., Pecher, I., Aaltonen, S., & Stenholm, P. (2007). Study on practices and policies in the social enterprise sector in Europe (Final report). Vienna: KMU Forschung Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, B., & Nicholls, A. (2013). The role of legitimacy in social enterprise-corporate collaboration. Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), 130–146. doi:10.1108/SEJ-01-2013-0002
   Google Scholar
• Kautonen, M. (2006). The regional innovation system bottom-up: A Finnish perspective. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(3), 247–263. doi:10.1007/s11266–006–9016–2
   Google Scholar
• Khan, R., Pekkarinen, S., Konsti-Laakso, S., & Melkas, H. (2015). How the social enterprises support social sustainability. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 6(4), 33–51. doi:10.4018/IJISSC.2015100103
   Google Scholar
• Littig, B., & Grießler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), 65–79. doi:10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Magis, K., & Shinn, C. (2009). Emergent principles of social sustainability. In J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King, et al. (Eds.), Understanding the social dimension of sustainability (pp. 15–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216. doi:10.1093/cjres/rst007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121. doi:10.1177/104973239300300107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harward Business Review, 71(1), 75–86. Retrieved from http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jim/files/2010/04/Predators-and-Prey.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Land Survey of Finland. (2014). Yleiskarttarasteri 1:4 500 000 aineistoa. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/aineistot-palvelut/latauspalvelut/avoimien-aineistojen-tiedostopalvelu
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nill, J., & Kemp, R. (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Research Policy, 38(4), 668–680. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelkonen, A. (2009). Developing a broad-based innovation policy in Finland: Societal opportunities confronting administrative and political challenges. Hallinnon Tutkimus, 28, 3–15. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:ELE-1492330
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship. Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434. doi:10.1108/14626000710773529
   Google Scholar
• Sjögrén, H., Puumalainen, K., Syrjä, P., & Barraket, J. (2015, February 2–6). Future of social enterprise in Europe – evidence from an expert survey. ACERE conference, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1/2), 4–32. doi:10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/viewArticle/1169
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, G. K., & King, M. C. (2009). Emergent principles of social sustainability. In J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King (Eds.), Understanding the social dimension of sustainability (pp. 199–210). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tueth, M. (2010). Fundamentals of sustainable business: A guide to the next 100 years. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Hermans, R. (2012). Finnish mosaic of regional innovation system – assessment of thematic regional innovation platforms based on related variety. European Planning Studies, 20(10), 1583–1602. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.713331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Melkas, H. (2006). A method for assessing absorptive capacity of a regional innovation system. Fennia, 184(1), 49–58. Retrieved from http://www.oaj.tsv.fi/index.php/fennia/article/view/3731
   Google Scholar
• Vavik, T., & Keitsch, M. (2010). Exploring relationships between universal design and social sustainable development: Some methodological aspects to the debate on the sciences of sustainability. Sustainable Development, 18, 295–305. doi:10.1002/sd.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin, J. (2012). Innovaatiotutkimuksen meta-analyysi: Entrepreneurship, innovations and value creation. Helsinki: Tekes ( in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, J., & Laxell, P. (2013). Alueet globaaleissa ekosysteemeissä. The final evaluation of the Centre of Expertise Programme. Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy (Innovation Department, 19/2013) (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Weybrecht, G. (2010). The sustainable MBA: The manager's guide to green business. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. (2008). Alternative perspectives on social enterprise. In J. J. Cordes & E. C. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits business (pp. 21–46). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar