The challenge of breaking the academia–business firewall in Czechia: comparing the role of differentiated knowledge bases in collaborative R&D projects

References

• Asheim, B. (2007). Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation, 20(3), 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., Moodysson, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2011). Knowledge bases, modes of innovation and regional innovation policy. In H. Bathelt (Ed.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of innovation and knowledge creation (pp. 227–249). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). Regional innovation systems and the geography of innovation. In J. Fagerberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Žížalová, P., Rumpel, P., & Skokan, K. (2011). Where does the knowledge for knowledge-intensive industries come from? The case of biotech in Prague and ICT in Ostrava. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1277–1303. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.573136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Žížalová, P., Rumpel, P., Skokan, K., & Chládek, P. (2013). Emerging regional innovation strategies in Central Europe: Institutions and regional leadership in generating strategic outcomes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 275–294. doi:10.1177/0969776411428651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., & Uhlíř, D. (2011). Teorie regionálního rozvoje: nástin, kritika, implikace. Prague: Karolinum.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2013). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization: Comparison of Two European policy concepts. 1322. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Ter Wal, A. (2007). Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of; footwear district in the South of Italy. Industry and Innovation, 14(2), 177–199. doi:10.1080/13662710701253441
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (1991) Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Bellhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, P., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H.J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crevoisier, O., & Jeannerat, H. (2009). Territorial knowledge dynamics: from the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1223–1241. doi:10.1080/09654310902978231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CZSO. (2014). Statistics on research and development 2013. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
   Google Scholar
• CZSO. (2015). Statistics on national accounts 2014. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
   Google Scholar
• De Fuentes, C., & Dutrenit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1682. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2001) Benchmarking industry-science relations – The role of framework conditions. Vienna: European Commission and Federal Ministry of Economy and Labour.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2006). Constructing regional advantage: Principles, perspectives, policies. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2010). Europe 2020 flagship initiative innovation union. COM(2010) 546 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2013). Co-development of science and technology at national level. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2014a). Innovation union scoreboard 2014. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2014b). Regional innovation scoreboard 2014. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., & Frenken, K. (2007). The evolution of inventor networks in the silicon valley and Boston regions. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(1), 53–71. doi:10.1142/S0219525907000921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M. (2006). Patterns of technological innovation in knowledge-intensive business services. Industry and Innovation, 13(3), 335–358. doi:10.1080/13662710600859157
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2007). Universities and innovation in space. Industry and Innovation, 14(2), 201–218. doi:10.1080/13662710701253466
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2011). Determinants of the efficiency of regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 45(7), 905–918. doi:10.1080/00343400802251494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. (2007). The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(2), 139–168. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. (2011a). Networks of innovation. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 155–166). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. (2011b). Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters: Evidence from Chile. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1329–1348. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.619973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E., & Arza, V. (2009). What drives the formation of valuable university-industry linkages? Insights from the wine industry. Research Policy, 38(6), 906–921. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1), 47–68. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E., & Pietrobelli, C. (2014). Social network analysis methodologies for the evaluation of cluster development programs. 2014/11. CIRCLE. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993) The embedded firm: On the socioeconomic of industrial networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, H., James, L., Dahlström, M., & Manniche, J. (2012). Knowledge dynamics, regions and public policy. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1759–1766. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Winther, L. (2011). Innovation, regional development and relations between high- and low-tech industries. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(3), 321–339. doi:10.1177/0969776411403990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S. J., Aslesen, H. W., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Research Policy, 43(3), 495–504. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, R., Meyer, S., Berger, M., & Reiner, C. (2011). Science-industry linkages. Prague: Joanneum Research.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2014). Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. 2014/17. CIRCLE. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. A. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy, 40(10), 1354–1368. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677–693. doi:10.1080/00343401003614274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levén, P., Holmström, J., & Mathiassen, L. (2014). Managing research and innovation networks: Evidence from a government-sponsored cross-industry program. Research Policy, 43(1), 156–168. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992) National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National innovation systems – Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi:10.1080/13662710601130863
   Google Scholar
• Manniche, J. (2012). Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: On the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge bases model. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1823–1841. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(78), 773–776. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00043-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek, D., Meislová, K., & Žížalová, P. (2013). Emerging R&D centres supported by EU structural funds in the Czech Republic and their sustainability. Ergo, 8(1), 17–24. doi:10.2478/ergo-2013-0003
   Google Scholar
• Marek, D. (2014). Competence centres: Case study of strategic P/PPs in STI. Prague: Technology Centre ASCR.
   Google Scholar
• Marek, D. (2015). Industry-science collaboration in joint projects: Harvesting potential of the RDI information system for targeted innovation policy. Ergo, 10(1), 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. doi:10.1177/0969776411427326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Coenen, L., & Asheim, B. (2008). Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon valley life-science cluster. Environment and Planning A, 40(5), 1040–1056. doi:10.1068/a39110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Government. (2014). Analysis of the existing state of research, development and innovation in the Czech Republic. Prague: Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, Research, Development and Innovation Council.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. (2011). Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40(4), 539–552. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'Este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plum, O., & Hassink, R. (2014). Knowledge bases, innovativeness and competitiveness in creative industries: The case of Hamburg's video game developers. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 248–268. doi:10.1080/21681376.2014.967803
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, A., & Martin, B. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: Critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509–532. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedita, S.R., Noni, I., & de, Pilotti, L. (2015). Social network analysis methodologies for the evaluation of cluster development programs. 2015/4. CIRCLE. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Skokan, K. (2012). The assessment of knowledge bases in the regions. In Advances in economics, risk management, political and Law science (pp. 159–164). Zlin: Tomas Bata University.
   Google Scholar
• Srholec, M. (2014). ERAWATCH country report: Czech Republic. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Srholec, M., & Žížalová, P. (2013). Mapping the geography of RandD: What can we learn for regional innovation policy in the Czech Republic and beyond? European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1862–1878. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.806435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, M. (2011). Regional knowledge networks. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 222–233). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, M., & Ploder, M. (2008). Structure and strategy within heterogeneity: Multiple dimensions of regional networking. Regional Studies, 42(6), 793–815. doi:10.1080/00343400701861310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1843–1866. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassey, G. (2005). The disaggregated technology production function: A new model of university and corporate research. Research Policy, 34(3), 287–303. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A., & Boschma, R. (2009). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 739–756. doi:10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Asheim, B., & Boschma, R. (2013). Knowledge sourcing, innovation and constructing advantage in regions of Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 161–169. doi:10.1177/0969776412457173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59–71. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Asheim, B., & Miorner, J. (2015). Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems. 2015/1. Lund: Lund University, CIRCLE.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W.-C. (2009). Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective. Regional Studies, 43(3), 325–351. doi:10.1080/00343400902777059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokura, Y., Matsubara, H., & Sternberg, R. (2013). R&D networks and regional innovation: Social network analysis of joint research projects in Japan. Area, 45(4), 493–503. doi:10.1111/area.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825. doi:10.1002/smj.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žížalová, P. (2010). Geography of knowledge-based collaboration in a post-communist country: Specific experience or generalized pattern? European Planning Studies, 18(5), 791–814. doi:10.1080/09654311003744134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar