Alienated and politicized? Young planners’ confrontation with entrepreneurial and authoritarian state intervention in urban development in Turkey

References

• Adler, P. (2013). Dispute resolution meets policy analysis: Native gathering rights on private lands. In J. Forester (Ed.), Planning in the face of power (pp. 41–57). Washington, DC: American Planning Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bademli, R. (2005). Kentsel Planlama İşliği Notları, TMMOB SPO Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, O. (2012). The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey: Unraveling the role of the public sector. Habitat International, 36(1), 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blechman, F. (2013). From conflict generation to consensus building: Using many of the same skills. In J. Forester (Ed.), Planning in the face of power (pp. 23–36). Washington, DC: American Planning Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Candan, T. K. (2015). Cumhuriyetle Hesaplaşmanın Zirve Mekanı: Atatürk Orman Çiftliği ve Kaçak Saray, Dosya, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi.
   Google Scholar
• Eraydın, A. (2012). Contradictions in the neoliberal policy instruments: What is the stance of the state? In T. Tasan-Kok, & G. Beaten (Eds.), Contradictions of neoliberal planning: Cities, policies and politics (pp. 61–79). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eraydın, A., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2013). State response to contemporary urban movements in Turkey: A critical overview of state entrepreneurialism and authoritarian interventions. Antipode, 46(1), 110–129. doi:10.1111/anti.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, K. (1986). On work and alienation. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 1–8. doi:10.2307/2095474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. (2012). Fifty theses on urban planning and urban planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(1), 107–114. doi:10.1177/0739456X11420441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2013). Planning in the face of conflict: The surprising possibilities of facilitative leadership. Chicago, IL: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Gorz, A. (1989). The critique of economic reason. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Günay, B. (2012). Planlama Kuramı ve Kentsel Planlama Eğitimi. (Melih Ersoy, der.). Kentsel Planlama Kuramları. Ankara: İmge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2015). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), 217–234. doi:10.1068/b230217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinok, Ç. (2006). Kentleşme Siyasaları. Ankara: Kaynak Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T., & Ünsal, Ö. (2010). Urban transformation as state-led property transfer: An analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1479–1499. doi:10.1177/0042098009353629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penpecioglu, M. (2011). Kapitalist Kentleşme Dinamiklerinin Türkiye'deki Son 10 Yılı: Yapılı Çevre Üretimi, Devlet ve Büyük Ölçekli Kentsel Projeler [Last ten years of capitalist urbanization dynamics in Turkey: Production of the built environment, state and large-scale urban projects] Birikim, no: 270.
   Google Scholar
• Penpecioglu, M. (2012). Political construction of urban development projects: The case of Turkey (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2005). Communicative planners as Naїve Mandarins of the neo-liberal state? European Journal of Spatial Development. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Debate/debate051208.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2009). Planners’ role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neoliberal realities. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 65–84. doi:10.1080/09654310802513948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783–791. doi:10.2307/2088565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şengül, H. T. (2009). Kentsel Çelişki ve Siyaset: Kapitalist kentleşme süreçlerinin eleştirisi. Ankara: İmge.
   Google Scholar
• Şengül, H. T. (2015). Gezi Başkaldırısı Ertesinde Kent Mekanı ve Siyasal Alanın Yeni Dinamikleri. METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 32(1), 1–20. doi:10.4305/METU.JFA.2015.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. (2013). Mediation and collaboration in architecture and community planning. In J. Forester (Ed.), Planning in the face of power. (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Planning Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• ŞPO. (2010). 3. Köprü Projesi Değerlendirme Raporu [Evaluation Report on Third Bridge Project]. Retrieved from http://www.spoist.org/dokuman/Raporlarimiz/spoist_3.koprurapor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ŞPO. (2014). Mesleki Etik ve İlkeler [Ethical rules and principles prepared for the planning profession]. Retrieved from http://www.spo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=4143#.Ur8CLvRdWSo
   Google Scholar
• ŞPO. (2015). Quantitative data received from chamber of city planners in Turkey (The number of city planners and their years of graduation). Retrieved from http://www.spo.org.tr/hakkimizda/istatistikler/rapor1.php
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. (2004). Budapest, Istanbul, and Warsaw: Institutional and spatial change. Eburon: Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. (2007). Global urban forms and local strategies of property market actors. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(1), 69–90. doi:10.1007/s10901-006-9067-0
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. (2012). Introduction: Contradictions of neoliberal urban planning. In T. Tasan-Kok, & G. Baeten (Eds.), Contradictions of neoliberal planning: Cities, policies, politics (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tekeli, İ. (2007). Akılcı Planlamadan Bir Demokrasi Projesi Olarak Planlamaya (İlhan Tekeli Toplu Eserler 7), Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Tümerdem, N. (2014). A case study of the third bridge: An exploration of the impacts of the transportation infrastructure on the city's geography. Paper presented at EURAU 2014, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar