Regional polycentricity: an indicator framework for assessing cohesion impacts of railway infrastructures

References

• Abrahams, G. (2014). What ‘is’ territorial cohesion? What does it ‘do’?: Essentialist versus pragmatic approaches to using concepts. European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2134–2155. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.819838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., & Berechman, J. (2000). Transport investment and economic development. London: Ed. UCL Press, 387 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Brezzi, M., & Veneri, P. (2015). Assessing polycentric urban systems in the OECD: Country, regional and metropolitan perspectives. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1128–1145. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.905005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J., Korzhenevych, A., & Schürmann, C. (2010). Assessing spatial equity and efficiency impacts of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(7), 795–811. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgalassi, D. (2010). Defining and measuring polycentric regions: The case of Tuscany. Munich Personal RePEc Archive – MPRA Paper No. 25880. Retrieved March 26, 2015, from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25880/
   Google Scholar
• Burger, M., & Meijers, E. (2012). Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1127–1149. doi:10.1177/0042098011407095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2009). Territorial Impact Assessment for European regions: A methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. Evaluation and program planning, 32(4), 342–350. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Hall, P. (2011). The impacts of high-speed trains on British economic geography: A study of the UK's InterCity 125/225 and its effects. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 689–704. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & De Abreu e Silva, J. (2013). Regional impacts of high-speed rail: A review of methods and models. Transportation Letters, 5(3), 131–143. doi: 10.1179/1942786713Z.00000000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copus, A. K. (1997). A new peripherality index for European regions. Report prepared for the Highlands and Islands European Partnership. Aberdeen: Rural Policy Group, Agricultural and Rural Economics Department, Scottish Agricultural College.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2003). Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8), 979–999. doi:10.1080/0965431032000146169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2007). Territorial cohesion, the European social model, and spatial policy research. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Inst. Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• De Goie, B., Burger, M. J., Frank, G., Van Oort, F. G., & Kitson, M. (2010). Functional polycentrism and Urban network development in the greater south east, United Kingdom: Evidence from commuting patterns, 1981–2001. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1149–1170. doi:10.1080/00343400903365102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (1999). ESDP European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2004). A new partnership for cohesion convergence competitiveness cooperation-Third report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2008). Green paper on territorial cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength. Luxemburgo: European Commission. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0616&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2010). Fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index.cfm/es/information/publications/reports/2010/fifth-report-on-economic-social-and-territorial-cohesion-investing-in-europes-future
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2011). White paper – Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. COM (2011) 144 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ENJ. (2010). Flowpy software. Retrieved July 5, 2014, from http://www.enj.com/software/index.php
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 1.1.1. (2004). Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Project Report 1.1.1., Stockholm: Nordic Centre for Spatial Development-Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2011). Territorial agenda of the European union 2020-Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Hungary: Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2015). Regions in the European Union. Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics NUTS 2013/EU-28. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/EU-Bookshop-Site/en_GB/-/EUR/ViewPublication-Start?PublicationKey=KSGQ14006
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat Database. (2015). Population data. Retrieved March 5, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2007). From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 40(6), 667–678. doi:10.1080/00343400600868937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, A., Pedregal, B., Rodríguez, J. C., Pita, M. F., & Zoido, F. (2009). El concepto de cohesión territorial. Escalas de aplicación, sistemas de medición y políticas derivadas. Boletín de la AGE, 50, 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Gatti, G., & Cavuoti, E. (1988). L'impiego dei modelli tassonomici per l'analisi funzionale di reti stradali: la gerarchizzazione. Rivista Autostrade, 4, 60–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gatti, G., Cavuoti, E., & dell'Olio, L. (2002, June). Modelos taxonómicos para el estudio de las relaciones entre condiciones de red y desarrollo del territorio. Paper presented at the V Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte, Santander, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Givoni, M. (2006). Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: A review. Transport Reviews, 26(5), 593–611. doi:10.1080/01441640600589319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golobiĉ, M., & Marot, N. (2011). Territorial impact assessment: Integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies. Evaluation and program planning, 34(3), 163–173. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalo Orden, H., Rojo Arce, M., dell'Olio, L., & Ibeas Portilla, A. (2008, July). Los modelos taxonómicos y su aplicación al estudio del impacto de las nuevas infraestructuras de transporte. Paper presented at the VIII Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte, A Coruña, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Grant-Muller, S. M., Mackie, P., Nellthorp, J., & Pearman, A. (2001). Economic appraisal of European transport projects: The state-of-the-art revisited. Transport Reviews, 21(2), 237–261. doi:10.1080/01441640119423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, N. (2007). Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, 44(11), 2077–2103. doi:10.1080/00420980701518941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, J., Condeço-Melhorado, A., & Martín, J. C. (2010). Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Puebla, J. (2001). Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4), 229–242. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Puebla, J. (2004). El tren de alta velocidad y sus efectos espaciales. Investigaciones Regionales, 5, 199–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Pain, K. (2006). From metropolis to polyopolis. In P. Hall & K. Pain (Eds.), The polycentric metropolis (pp. 3–16). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• ICANE. (2011). Population and Housing Census 2011. Instituto Cántabro de Estadística. Retrieved July 10, 2014, from http://www.icane.es/population/population-figures
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo, R. (2001). Transportes: un Enfoque Integral (2nd ed.). Madrid: Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos Canales y Puertos.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, R. C., & Musterd, S. (2001). The polycentric urban region: Towards a research Agenda. Urban Studies, 38(4), 623–633. doi:10.1080/00420980120035259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leake, G. R., & Huzayyin, A. S. (1979). Accessibility measures and their suitability for use in trip generation models. Traffic Engineering and Control, 20(12), 566–572.
   Google Scholar
• López, E., Gutiérrez, J., & Gómez, G. (2008). Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: An accessibility approach. European Planning Studies, 16(2), 277–301. doi:10.1080/09654310701814629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, E., & Monzón, A. (2010). Integration of sustainability issues in strategic transport planning: A multi-criteria model for the assessment of transport infrastructure plans. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25, 440–451. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00652.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Sánchez-Mateos, H. S., & Givoni, M. (2012). The accessibility impact of a new high-speed rail line in the UK – a preliminary analysis of winners and losers. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 105–114. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Sánchez-Mateos, H. S., Mohíno Sanz, I., Ureña Francés, J. M., & Solís Trapero, E. (2014). Road accessibility and articulation of metropolitan spatial structures: The case of Madrid (Spain). Journal of Transport Geography, 37, 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2011). Territorial cohesion: A conceptual analysis. CEG-IGOT Lisbon: Lisbon University.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2013). Assessing territorial impacts of the EU cohesion policy: The portuguese case. European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1960–1988. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.813910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. (2008). Measuring polycentricity and its promises. European Planning Studies, 16(9), 1313–1323. doi:10.1080/09654310802401805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. J., Waterhout, B., & Zonneveld, W. A. M. (2007). Closing the gap: Territorial cohesion through polycentric development. European Journal of Spatial Development, 24(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• MF. (2005). PEIT: Plan Estratégico de Infraestructuras y Transporte 2005–2020. Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica Ministerio de Fomento.
   Google Scholar
• MF. (2011). Observatorio del Ferrocarril en España Informe 2011. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://www.fomento.gob.es/NR/rdonlyres/2468973B-15BA-4BCD-B92A-B520E81341B2/115936/Informe_Observatorio_Ferrocarril_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MF. (2013). PITVI: Plan de Infraestructuras, Transporte y Vivienda 2012–2024. Madrid: S. E. de Infraestructuras, Transporte y Vivienda, Ministerio de Fomento.
   Google Scholar
• Mirwaldt, K., Mcmaster, I., & Bachlter, J. (2009). Reconsidering Cohesion Policy: The Contested Debate on Territorial Cohesion, European Policy Research Paper, No. 66, Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Monzón, A., Ortega, E., & López, E. (2013). Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of high-speed rail extensions in urban areas. Cities, 30, 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogués, S., & González-González, E. (2014). Multi-criteria impacts assessment for ranking highway projects in Northwest Spain. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice, 65, 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odgaard, T., Keely, C., & Laird, J. (2005). Current practice in project appraisal in Europe: Analysis of country reports. FP6-HETACO Contract No. FP6–2002-SSP-1/502482 deliverable 1. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://heatco.ier.uni-stuttgart.de/hd1final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. L., Fliedner, G., & Currie, K. (1995). Comparison of the REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), 522–539. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0340-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, E., López, E., & Monzón, A. (2012). Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadaskalopoulos, A., Karaganis, A., & Christofakis, M. (2005). The spatial impact of EU Pan-European transport axes: City clusters formation in the Balkan area and developmental perspectives. Transport Policy, 12(6), 488–499. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (2004). The polycentric urban region: A closer inspection. Regional Studies, 38(3), 231–240. doi:10.1080/003434042000211114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez López, C. (2004). Técnicas de análisis multivariante de datos: aplicaciones con SPSS. Madrid: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W. (1973). Theory of the distribution of city sizes: Review and prospects. Regional Studies, 7(3), 239–251. doi:10.1080/09595237300185241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schürmann, C., & Talaat, A. (2002, August). The European Peripherality Index. Paper presented at the 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Dortmund, Deutschland.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oort, F. G., Burger, M. J., & Raspe, O. (2010). On the economic foundation of the urban network paradigm: Spatial integration, functional integration and economic complementarities within the Dutch Randstad. Urban Studies, 47, 725–748. doi:10.1177/0042098009352362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasanen, A. (2012). Functional polycentricity: Examining metropolitan spatial structure through the connectivity of urban sub-centres. Urban Studies, 49(16), 3627–3644. doi:10.1177/0042098012447000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneri, P., & Burgalassi, D. (2012). Questioning polycentric development and its effects. Issues of definition and measurement for the Italian NUTS-2 regions. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 1017–1037. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.673566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R. (1997). High-speed rail in Europe: Experience and issues for future development. Annals of Regional Science, 31(1), 21–38. doi 10.1007/s001680050037 doi: 10.1007/s001680050037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R. (2014). High-speed rail and regional development: The case of intermediate stations. Journal of Transport Geography, 42, 157–165. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (1999). Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/00343409950118878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar