Beyond the divide: evaluation in co-evolutionary spatial planning

References

• Abbott, J. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), 237–251. doi:10.1177/0739456X04267710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2006). Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects. European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1487–1500. doi:10.1080/09654310600852464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2010). More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R., & Faludi, A. (1989). Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16(2), 127–140. doi:10.1068/b160127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P., Backhurst, M., Day, M., Ericksen, N., Laurian, L., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2006). What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(4), 581–600. doi:10.1068/b31166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukers, E., Bertolini, L., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2014). Using cost benefit analysis as a learning process: Identifying interventions for improving communication and trust. Transport Policy, 31, 61–72. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., Van Assche, K., & Duineveld, M. (2015). The search for evolutionary approaches to governance. In R. Beunen, K. Van Assche, & M. Duineveld (Eds.), Evolutionary governance theory (pp. 3–17). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. (2009). The urban connection: An actor-relational approach to urban planning. Rotterdam: 010-Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L., & de Roo, G. (2014). Planning of undefined becoming: First encounters of planners beyond the plan. Planning Theory. doi:10.1177/1473095214542631
   Google Scholar
• Boussauw, K., & Boelens, L. (2015). Fuzzy tales for hard blueprints: The selective coproduction of the spatial policy plan for Flanders, Belgium. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy. doi:10.1068/c12327
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2008). Emergent strategic management and planning mechanisms in complex adaptive systems. Public Management Review, 10(3), 319–340. doi:10.1080/14719030802002741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., & Highfield, W. E. (2005). Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 159–175. doi:10.1080/01944360508976690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins, H. W. (1979). The planning monitor: An accountability theory of plan evaluation. Environment and Planning A, 11(7), 745–758. doi:10.1068/a110745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2008). Performance measurement in planning – towards a holistic view. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(2), 428–454. doi:10.1068/c62m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. S. (1985). Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 51(1), 63–73. doi:10.1080/01944368508976801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commissie Van Veen. (1971). Rapport van de Commissie Interdepartementale taakverdeling en coördinatie. Den Haag: SDU.
   Google Scholar
• De Peuter, B. (2008). Towards a mature evaluation culture in Belgium and Flanders? A search of drivers, recent developments and challenges. Paper presented at the symposium: Policy and programme evaluation in Europe: Cultures and prospects, Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34–42. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.660356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemish Government. (2013). Planning in Uitvoering: strategische projecten in het Vlaams Ruimtelijk Beleid [Planning in progress: Strategic projects in the Flemish Spatial policy]. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Furubo, J., Rist, R., & Sandahl, R. (2002). International Atlas of evaluation. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2007). Problematising responsibility in planning theory and practice: On seeing the middle of the string? Progress in Planning, 68(2), 57–96. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. (1968). A goals-achievement matrix for evaluating alternative plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34 (1), 19–29. doi: 10.1080/01944366808977215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2008). Plan(e) speaking: A multiplanar theory of spatial planning. Planning Theory, 7(1), 24–50. doi:10.1177/1473095207085664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakee, A. (1998). Evaluation and planning: Inseparable concepts. Town Planning Rewiew, 69(4), 359–374. doi:10.3828/tpr.69.4.3803q86489619xm7
   Google Scholar
• Khakee, A. (2003). The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice. Evaluation, 9(3), 340–352. doi:10.1177/13563890030093007
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., Crawford, J., Day, M., Kouwenhoven, P., Mason, G., Ericksen, N., & Beattie, L. (2010). Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 740–757. doi:10.1068/b35051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2004). Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 471–480. doi:10.1080/01944360408976395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichfield, N. (1956). Economics of planned development. London: Estates Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1981). Unverständliche Wissenschaft. In L. Niklas (Ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung: 3. Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation (pp. 170–177). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1990). Political theory in the welfare state. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010). Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), 343–361. doi:10.1177/0885412210364589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, J., & Teubner, G. (2005). Changing maps: Empirical legal autopoiesis. In R. Banakar & M. Travers (Eds.), Theory and method in socio-legal research (pp. 215–237). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pattyn, V. (2014). Why organizations (do not) evaluate? Explaining evaluation activity through the lens of configurational comparative methods. Evaluation, 20(3), 348–367. doi:10.1177/1356389014540564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. (2000). Self-organization and the city. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. (2006). A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance and its ironies. In J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 82–100). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• de Roo, G., Hillier, J., & Van Wezemael, J. (Eds.). (2012). Complexity and planning. Systems, assemblages and simulations. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P., Lipsey, M., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rouge, M. (1947). La Géonomie: Ou l'Organisation de l'Espace. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steigenga, W. (1964). Moderne planologie. Utrecht: Het spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996). After the Plans: Methods to Evaluate the Implementation Success of Plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2), 79–91. doi:10.1177/0739456X9601600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1997). Success, Failure, and Conformance: An Alternative Approach to Planning Evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(4), 573–587. doi:10.1068/b240573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., van Buuren, A., & Gerrits, L. (Eds.). (2009). Managing Complex Governance Systems: Dynamics, self-organization and coevolution in public investments. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Terryn, E., & Boelens, L. (2013). Adaptive management and planning: The emergence of a new role for policy evaluation. Paper presented at the AESOP/ACSP 5th joint congress 2013: Planning for resilient cities and regions, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Terryn, E., & Pisman, A. (2013). Evaluatie ruimtelijk beleid in Vlaanderen [Evaluation of the spatial policy in Flanders]. Heverlee: Steunpunt Ruimte.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (1996). New urban eras and old technological fears: Reconfiguring the goodwill of electronic things. Urban Studies, 33(8), 1463–1493. doi:10.1080/0042098966754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., & Verschraegen, G. (2008). The limits of planning: Niklas Luhmann's systems theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Planning Theory, 7(3), 263–283. doi:10.1177/1473095208094824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ongevalle, J., Huyse, H., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Dealing with complexity through actor-focused planning, monitoring and evaluation (PME). Evaluation, 20(4), 447–466. doi:10.1177/1356389014551487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeersch, E., & Houthaeve, R. (1994). Structuurplanning. Instrument voor het denken over en de vormgeving van de ruimtelijke structuur. Brugge: Die Keure.
   Google Scholar
• Voets, J., De Peuter, B., Vandekerckhove, B., Broeckaert, D., Le Roy, M., Maes, P., … Blummel, P. (2010). Evaluerend onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van de uitvoering van het ruimtelijk beleid in Vlaanderen [Evaluative research on the effectiveness of the implementation of spatial policy in Flanders]. Brussels: Flemish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. E., Rahman, S. A., & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), 282–289. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00071-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltjer, J., Alexander, E., Hull, A., & Ruth, M. (Eds.). (2015). Place-based evaluation for integrated land use management. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar