The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy

References

• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. In Independent report prepared at the request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy, Danuta Hübner. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2014). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization: Comparisons of two European policy concepts. Italian Journal of Regional Science (Scienze Regionali), 13(1), 51–68. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001004
   Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government in European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2015). Mapping the regional divide in Europe: A measure for assessing quality of government in 206 European regions. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 315–346. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (Eds.) (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation: An inquiry on the knowledge economy in European regions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON (2012). KIT Territorial Dimension of Innovation and Knowledge Economy. Luxembourg. https://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_AppliedResearch/kit.html.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2007, January). Cohesion policy 2007–13. Commentaries and official texts. Luxembourg: Directorate-General for Regional Policy, Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2014). Investment for jobs and growth – promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities: Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels: Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialization: Opportunities and challenges regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., Goddard, J., Morgan, K., Goenaga Beldarrain, X., Landabaso, M., Neuwelaars, C., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS 3), S3 Smart Specialisation Platform. Seville: IPTS Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=e50397e3-f2b1-4086-8608-7b86e69e8553&groupId=10157
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization and European regional development policy. In D. B. Audretsch, A. Link, & M. Walshok (Eds.), Oxford handbook of local competitiveness, (458–480). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraunhofer ISI. (2013). Smart specialisation approaches: A new policy paradigm on its way from concept to practice. Karlsruhe. See: http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/docs/p/de/vortragsfolien/regionen_cluster/S3_Projekt_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garcilazo, E., & Rodriguez Pose, A. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274–1290. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (2012). Choosing races and placing bets: UK national innovation policy and the globalisation of innovation systems. In D. Greenaway (Ed.), The UK in a global world. How can the UK focus on steps in global value chains that really add value? BIS e-book, CEPR and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. http://www.cepr.org/pubs/books/cepr/BIS_eBook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2013). Smart specialisation in practice – one year onwards – a follow up to our 2013 survey. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI. http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/docs/p/de/vortragsfolien/regionen_cluster/S3_Projekt_2014_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015a). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – leading unlike horses to water. European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015b). First results of the Fraunhofer ISI – RIS3 survey 2015. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015c, September). Weaknesses and opportunities of RIS3-type policies: Seven theses. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H., Zenker, A., Müller, E., & Schnabl, E. (2014). Smart specialisation in practice: One year onwards. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI. http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/docs/p/de/vortragsfolien/regionen_cluster/S3_Stavanger_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H., Müller, E., Schnabl, E., & Zenker, A. (2014). From smart concept to challenging practice – how European regions deal with the commission’s request for novel innovation strategies. Working papers firms and region no. R2/2014. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2015). The regional and urban policy of the European Union: Cohesion, results-orientation and smart specialisation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013a). Redesigning and reforming European regional policy: The reasons, the logic and the outcomes. International Regional Science Review, 36(3), 424–445. doi:10.1177/0160017612463234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013b). Transforming European regional policy: A results-driven agenda and smart specialisation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(2), 405–431. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grt021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014a). Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 409–427. doi:10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0052
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014b). The role of the smart specialisation agenda in a reformed EU cohesion policy. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 15–32. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001002
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. (2012). The New geography of jobs. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., Reid, A., & Rivera Leon, L. (2015). An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: Can smart specialization overcome the paradox in central and Eastern Europe? Journal of European Economic Policy Reform, doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1013545
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, M., Gibaja, J. J., Franco, S., Murciego, A., Gianelle, C., Hegyi, F. B., & Kleibrink, A. (2014). Regional benchmarking in the smart specialisation process: Identification of reference regions based on structural similarity. S3 working paper series no. 03/2014. Seville: IPTS Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Innovation driven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/smart-specialisation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Periáñez-Forte, I. (2015, October 1). Smart specialisation platform. Paper presented at the Seminar on Governance, Leadership and Institutional Dynamics, Orkestra-Basque Institute of Competitiveness, San Sebastian.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., & Stancova, K. C. (2015). External dimensions of smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for trans-regional and transnational collaboration in the EU-13. S3 Working paper series no. 09/2015. Luxembourg: IPTS-JRC Seville, Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Working paper, Kennedy School of Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics many recipes: Globalization, institutions and economic growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2014). When ideas trump interests: Preferences, worldviews, and policy innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 189–208. doi:10.1257/jep.28.1.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic and Social Progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Technopolis, UNU-MERIT, & Fraunhofer ISI. (2012). Regional innovation monitor: Governance, policies and perspectives in European regions. Brussels: Technopolis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, M., van Oort, F. G., Diodato, D., & Ruijs, A. (2013). Regional competitiveness and smart specialization in Europe: place-based development in international economic networks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Veugeleurs, R. (2015, August). Do we have the right kind of diversity in innovation policies among EU Member States? Working paper no. 108. WWWFOREURORE Welfare Wealth Work, Framework 7 Research Project.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2010). Innovation policy: A guide for developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2011). Igniting innovation policy: Rethinking the role of government in emerging Europe and Central Asia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar