Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: missing links in S3 design and implementation

References

• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45, 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2014). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Sciences, 13, 51–68. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001004
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011a). Technolgical relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Todtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 187–197). Cheltenam: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011b). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation (pp. 64–81). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Gianelle, C. (2014). Regional branching and smart specialisation policy. S3 Policy Brief Series, n. 6, doi:10.2791/65062.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 289–311. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32, 69–87. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2012). Agglomeration, related variety, and vertical integration. Economic Geography, 88, 255–277. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (2009). Spatial spillovers and regional growth: A cognitive approach. European Planning Studies, 17, 639–658. doi:10.1080/09654310902778045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (2013). Knowledge, innovation, and regional performance: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44, 185–194. doi:10.1111/grow.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49, 767–781. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffano, M., & Foray, D. (2014). The centrality of entrepreneurial discovery in building and implementing a smart specialisation strategy. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 33–50. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001003
   Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2014). The emergence of new technology-based sectors in european regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology. Research Policy, 43, 1681–1696. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. (2015). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49, 752–766. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.806793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X. G., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., … Mulatero, F. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS 3). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Goenega, X. (2013). The goals of smart specialisation. S3 Policy Brief Series, n. 1. doi:10.2791/20158
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. H., & St. John, C. H. (1994). A methodological note on diversity measurement. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 153–168. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2005). How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 15, 521–535. doi:10.1080/09654310500107134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317, 482–487. doi:10.1126/science.1144581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level: Some open questions. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 107–126. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., & Guzzini, E. (in press). La ‘Smart Specialization Strategy’ delle regioni italiane e le relazioni fra ambiti tecnologici. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23, 2079–2098. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Some practical elements associated with the design of an integrated and territorial place-based approach to EU cohesion policy. In R. Crescenzi & M. Percoco (Eds.), Geography, institutions and regional economic performance (pp. 95–118). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). The role of the smart specialisation agenda in a reformed EU cohesion policy. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 15–32. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001002
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49, 1291–1302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., & Henning, M. (2013). Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 297–316. doi:10.1002/smj.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How Do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87, 237–265. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26, 141–156. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 423–443. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatraro, F. (2010). Knowledge coherence, variety and economic growth: Manufacturing evidence from Italian regions. Research Policy, 39, 1289–1302. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., di Cataldo, M., & Rainoldi, A. (2014). The role of government institutions for smart specialisation and regional development. S3 Policy Brief Series, n. 4. doi:10.2791/71842
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Sörvik, J., & Midtkandal, I. (2014). Inter-regional collaboration in research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3 ). S3 Working Paper Series, n. 6. doi:10.2791/13682
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1, 185. doi:10.1504/IJTG.2005.007050
   Google Scholar