European plans for the smart city: from theories and rules to logistics test case

References

• Allmendinger, P. (2009). Planning theory (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anthopoulos, L., & Vakali, A. (2012). Urban planning and smart cities: Interrelations and reciprocities. In F. Alvarez, F. Cleary, P. Daras, J. Domingue, A. Galis, A. Garcia, … T. Zahariadis (Eds.), Future internet assembly 2012: From promises to reality, 4th FIA book LNCS 7281 (pp. 178–189). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benevolo, L. (1989). Le origini dell’urbanistica moderna. Bari: Universale Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Chilà, G., Musolino, G., Polimeni, A., Rindone, C., Russo, F., & Vitetta, A. (2016). Transport models and intelligent transportation system to support urban evacuation planning process. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 1–8. doi:10.1049/iet-its.2015.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirianni, F., Panuccio, P., & Rindone, C. (2013). A comparison of urban planning systems between the UK and Italy: Commercial development and city logistic plan. WIT Transactions On The Built Environment, 1, 785–797. doi:10.2495/UT130631
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, M. (Ed.). (2014). Smart cities governing, modelling and analysing the transition. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010a). Communication from the commission - Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved October 2014, from http://www.eur.lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010b). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Europe 2020 – flagship initiative innovation union. Retrieved May 2014, from http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/innovation-union-communication_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012a). Frequently asked questions regarding European innovation partnerships. Retrieved April 2016, From http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/eip_faq_may_2012.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012b). Communication from the commission smart cities and communities - European innovation partnership. Retrieved April, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/files/ec_communication_scc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013a). European innovation partnership on smart cities and communities, strategic implementation plan. Retrieved May, 2014, from http://www.ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/files/sip_final_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013b). Commission staff working document strategy for European technology platforms: ETP 2020. Retrieved May 2014, from http://www.ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/etp/docs/swd-2013-strategy-etp-2020_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013c). Smart cities stakeholder platform, using EU funding mechanism for smart cities. Retrieved June 2014, from http://www.eu-smartcities.eu/sites/all/files/Guideline-Using%20EU%20fundings%20mechanism%20for%20smart%20cities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a). Outriders for European competitiveness European innovation partnership as a tool for systemic change. Retrieved May 2014, from http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/outriders_for_european_competitiveness_eip.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014b). European innovation partnership for smart cities and communities. Retrieved June 2014, from http://www.ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/about-partnership/how-does-it-work/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014c). European innovation partnership on smart cities and communities, operational implementation plan: First public draft. Retrieved June 2014, from http://www.ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/files/operational-implementation-plan-oip-v2_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014d). Guidelines. Developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. Retrieved June 2014, from http://www.eltis.org/sites/eltis/files/guidelines-developing-and-implementing-a-sump_final_web_jan2014b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU. Directorate general for internal policies. Retrieved May 2014, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1973). Planning theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1985). Critical theory and public life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• French Government. (1852). Law on expropriation of 26 March 1852. Retrieved April 2016, from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1998). Planning theory revisited. European Planning Studies, 6(3), 245–253. doi:10.1080/09654319808720459
   Google Scholar
• Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Meijers, E., & Pichler-Milanović, N. (2007). Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology. Retrieved April 2016, from http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. (1970). Megalopoli, funzioni e relazioni di una pluricittà. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. G. (2002). Urban and regional planning (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., & Williams, R. (1993). European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30(4/5), 701–720. doi:10.1080/00420989320081881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320. doi:10.1080/13604810802479126
   Google Scholar
• Italian Government. (1942). Law of 17 August 1942. Retrieved May 2015, from http://www.parlamento.it/leggi/htm
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. (2013). Smart cities: Vision. Retrieved October 2014, from http://www.smartcities.media.mit.edu/frameset.html
   Google Scholar
• van Rooijen, T., & Quak, H. (2014). City logistics in the European CIVITAS initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 312–325. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1476
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F. (2013). Modelling behavioral aspects of urban freight movement. In M. Ben-Akiva, H. Meersman, & E. Voorde (Eds.), Freight transport modelling (pp. 353–375). Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Comi, A. (2010). A modelling system to simulate goods movements at an urban scale. Transportation, 37(6), 987–1009. doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9276-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Comi, A. (2011). Measures for sustainable freight transportation at urban scale: Expected goals and tested results in Europe. Urban Planning and Development, 137(2), 142–152. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samonà, G. (1959). L’urbanistica e l’avvenire della città. Bari: Universale Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffers, H. Komninos, N. Pallot, M. Trousse, B. Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks. J. Domingue, A. Galis, A. Gavras, T. Zahariadis, D. Lambert, F. Cleary, … M. Nilsson (Eds.), Future internet assembly (pp. 431–446). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom. (1844). Law of 9 August 1844 for London and around. Retrieved April 2016, www.parliament.uk
   Google Scholar