Smart specialization in a centralized state: strengthening the regional contribution in North East Romania

References

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU regional competitiveness index JRC scientific and policy reports report number EUR26060. Luxembourg: European Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher institutions: A literature review. OECD Working Papers No. 9. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). Regional innovation systems and the geographical foundations of innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. An independent report prepared at the Request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2015, September 6). Romania corruption: Bucharest Mayor arrested. BBC News, Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., & Csank, P. (2015). Can emerging regional innovation strategies in less developed European regions bridge the main gaps in the innovation process. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1–20. doi:10.1177/0263774X15601680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, M., Marinelli, E., Haegerman, K., & Dos Santos, P. (2015). Bridging thinkers and doers: First lessons from the entrepreneurial discovery process in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace. JRC Science and Policy Report. Smart Specialisation Policy Brief No. 14/2015, Seville.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (2016). Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1145575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, A. (2015, July 27). Romania elite feels heat of corruption purge. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation and economic growth in European regions. Growth and Change, 44, 195–227. doi:10.1111/grow.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2015). Mapping the regional divide in Europe: A measure for assessing quality of government in 206 European regions. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 315–346. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Dijkstra, L. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European member states. Regional Studies, 48, 68–90. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 945–974. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.945
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012). Complex adaptive innovation systems: Relatedness and transversality in the evolving region. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doroftei, M., & Dimulescu, V. (2015). Romanian Public Procurement in the construction sector: Corruption risks and particularistic links. FP7 ANTICORRP Project WP8. Retrieved from http://anticorrp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/D8.1.5-Romania.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation. Brussels: DG Regio.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013, December 17). Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L 347/320.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a, March). National/regional innovation strategies for smart specialisation. Cohesion Policy Fact Sheet. Brussels: DG Regio.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014b). Regional innovation scoreboard 2014. Brussels: DG Enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014c). ERAWATCH annual country report: Romania. ERAWATCH. Brussels: DG Enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015a). Country profile Key indicators: România. Brussels: DG Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015b, May 11). Seventh FP7 monitoring report. Brussels: DG RTD.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016). Total intramural R&D expenditure (GERD) by NUTS 2 regions. Downloaded from Eurostat database on 22 February 2016. Statistical Table: rd_e_gerdreg.
   Google Scholar
• Florentina, C. (2013). Regional development and innovation in Romania: Challenges and perspectives. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1(1), 234–242.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart Specialisation: From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. METI Working Paper 2011–001. Ecole Poytechnique Federal de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Gheorghiu, R. (2016, February 18). How to convey the S3 analysis: Building the evidence base for the S3. Presentation to Smart Specialisation Platform Workshop, Chisinau.
   Google Scholar
• Gheorghiu, R., Gheorghe, D., & Roman, I. (2014, June). Romania: Towards an RDI strategy with a strong Smart Specialisation component. Presentation to peer review event. Smart Specialisation Platform, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• GTZ. (2010). Clusters and potential clusters in Romania: A mapping exercise. Retrieved from http://www.minind.ro/presa_2010/iulie/MappingReport_230710.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603–633. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. Von. (1978). Competition as a discovery procedure. In F. A. Von Hayek (Ed.), New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas (pp. 179–190). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at a regional level. Scienze Regionali, 13(1), 107–126. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015a). Efforts to implement smart specialisation in practice – Leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015b). Weaknesses and opportunities of RIS3-type policies: Seven theses. Kahlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs private sector myths. London: Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2011). Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy. Economic Geography Working Paper 2011. Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Statistics. (2014, July 28). The innovation in industry and services during the period 2010–2012. Final Results. Press Release No. 178, Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 97–110. doi:10.1023/A:1013104805703
   Google Scholar
• Rodríquez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47, 1034–1047. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríquez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 673–706. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science-Metrix. (2015). Analysis of bibliometric indicators for European policies. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20, 1843–1866. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Wallet, F. (2013). Innovation and the governance of rural territories. In E. Coudel, H. Devautour, C. T. Soulard, G. Faure, & B. Hubert, (Eds.), Regional innovation systems in agriculture and food: How to go towards more sustainability (pp. 147–164). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimising research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspectives in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037–1047. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar