New venture high growth in high-tech environments

References

• Acs, Z. J., Carlsson, B., & Karlsson, C. (Eds.). (1999). Entrepreneurship, small and medium-sized enterprises and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z., Parsons, W., & Tracy, S. (2008). High-impact firms gazelles revisited. In S. O. O. Advocacy (Ed.), SBa Report, SBA Office of Advocacy, Washington, DC. Retrieved April 29, 2015, from www.sba.gov/advo/research
   Google Scholar
• Anima report. (2015). La meccanica nell’Anima. Technical report.L’industria meccanica n. 695, gennaio/febbraio, p. 16. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/federazioneanima/docs/695_bassa_def
   Google Scholar
• Anyadike-Danes, M., Hart, M., & Du, J. (2015). Firm dynamics and job creation in the United Kingdom: 1998–2013. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 12–27. doi:10.1177/0266242614552334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419–451. doi:10.1093/icc/10.2.419
   Google Scholar
• Aslesen, H. W., & Freel, M. (2012). Industrial knowledge bases as drivers of open innovation? Industry and Innovation, 19(7), 563–584 . doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.726807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assirm. (2014). Italia, stivale da corsa. I KIBS e il valore Italia. Technical report. Retrieved from http://www.unicomitalia.org/convegno-confindustria-intellect-italia-stivale-da-corsa-30-settem-bre2014-milano
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441–457. doi:10.1016/0167-7187(95)00499-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (1994). New, technology-based firms as agents of research-and-development and innovation – an empirical-study. Technovation, 14(4), 259–273. doi:10.1016/0166-4972(94)90010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924. doi:10.2307/1556419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamford, C. E., Dean, T. J., & McDougall, P. P. (2000). Entry strategies and the growth of bank start-ups in the U.S.: A critical examination of the niche prescription for new ventures. Paper presented at the ICSB World Conference, Brisbane, Australia, June.
   Google Scholar
• Barkman, R. (1994). Entrepreneurial characteristics and the size of the new firm: A model and an econometric test. Small Business Economics, 6, 117–125. doi:10.1007/BF01065184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005). A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663–687. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303. doi:10.2307/3069456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchetti, L., & Trovato, G. (2002). The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms. The role of the availability of external finance. Small Business Economics, 19(4), 291–306. doi:10.1023/A:1019678429111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belussi, F., Sammarra, A., & Sedita, S. R. (2010). Learning at the boundaries in an “Open Regional Innovation System”: A focus on firms’ innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry. Research Policy, 39(6), 710–721. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, D. L. (1979). The job generation process, MIT programme on neighbourhood and regional change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Brentani, U. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 169–187. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1830169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E., Kleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. O. (1993). Employment growth and innovation at the firm level. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3(2), 153–159. doi:10.1007/BF01213832
   Google Scholar
• Buederal, J., Preisendoerfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57, 227–242. doi:10.2307/2096207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., Evangelista, R., & Savona, M. (2006). Innovation and economic performance of services. A firm level analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3), 435–458. doi:10.1093/cje/bei067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29–39. doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00051-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, G. (1983). A stochastic model of organizational mortality: Review and reanalysis. Social Science Research, 12, 303–329. doi:10.1016/0049-089x(83)90022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, G. R., Bigelow, L. S., Seidel, M. D. L., & Tsai, L. B. (1996). The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry 1885–1981. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 117–137. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171009
   Google Scholar
• Cassia, L., & Minola, T. (2012). Hyper-growth of SMEs: Towards a reconciliation of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic resources. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 18(2), 179–197. doi:10.1108/13552551211204210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “Best Practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680. doi:10.2307/1556360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S.-O., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., & Nightingale, P. (2014). High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 91–112. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1429–1443. doi:10.1177/0149206310397772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2014). High-growth firms and technological knowledge: Do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 261–291. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures based study. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 365–383. doi:10.1002/smj.4250110504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., & Folta, T. (2000). Entrepreneurship and high-technology clusters. In D. L. Sexton & H. I. Landstron (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 348–367). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L. (2007). Penguin in a new suit: A tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(5), 913–943. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P. (1991). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6), 405–429. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(91)90028-c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., Achtenhagen, L., & Naldi, L. (2010). Small firm growth. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 69–166. doi:10.1561/0300000029
   Google Scholar
• Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (1999). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 211–229. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00013-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00080-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171. doi:10.2307/2233718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchesneau, D., & Gartner, W. (1990). A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(5), 297–312. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(90)90007-g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529. doi:10.2307/2393315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fesser, H. R., & Willard, G. E. (1990). Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high-tech firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 87–98. doi:10.1002/smj.4250110202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M. S. (2000). Strategy and structure in innovative manufacturing SMEs: The case of an English region. Small Business Economics, 15(1), 27–45. doi:10.1023/a:1012087912632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00115-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan, A., Grandinetti, R., & Paggiaro, A. (2014). Unveiling the growth process: Entrepreneurial growth and the use of external resources. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 20(1), 20–41. doi:10.1108/ijebr-12-2012-0142
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950. doi:10.1177/0149206306293860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., & Wang, N. (2012). Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? Research Policy, 41(6), 1072–1083. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, B., & Zucchella, A. (2014). A born global or born to run? The long-term growth of born global firms. Management International Review, 54(4), 497–525. doi:10.1007/s11575-014-0214-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51. doi:10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13–33. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 227–244. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Business Economics, 33(1), 59–75. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9182-x
   Google Scholar
• IMS. (2016). New strategic information and technologies roles in lifescience companies. New York, NY: EgonZehnder.
   Google Scholar
• Jarillo, J. C. (1989). Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 133–147. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(89)90027-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khessina, O. M., & Carroll, G. R. (2008). Product demography of de- novo and de- alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Organization Science, 19(1), 25–38. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. doi:10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26. doi:10.1080/08985620210159220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippman, S., & Rummelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability. An analysis of inter-firm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418–438. doi:10.2307/3003464
   Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Girma, S. (2010). Organic and acquisitive growth: Re-examining, testing and extending Penrose’s growth theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 48–74. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00879.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, C., & Vickers-Koch, M. (1995). Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 24(1), 7–22. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(95)90032-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Garcia, P., & Puente, S. (2012). What makes a high-growth firm? A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 1029–1041. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9321-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. G. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of organizations (Vol. 20). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, J. E. (1991). Patterns of growth, competitive technology, and financial strategies in young ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 189–208. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(91)90009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, S. K., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Prescott, J. E. (2004). The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 713–722. doi:10.1002/smj.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. G., Tsai, M. H., Venkataraman, S., & MacMillan, I. C. (1996). Innovation, competitive advantage and rent: A model and test. Management Science, 42(3), 389–403. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.3.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvie, A., & Davidsson, P. (2009). From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms. British Journal of Management, 20(s1), S63–S80. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261–288. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, A. M., & Casillas, J. C. (2007). High-growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: A discriminant analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(1), 69–88. doi:10.1080/08985620601002162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navaretti, G. B., Castellani, D., & Pieri, F. (2014). Age and firm growth: Evidence from three European countries. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 823–837. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9564-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/EUROSTAT. (2007). Eurostat Manual on Business Demography Statistics, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P. D., & Bokor, D. W. (1995). Strategy process-content interaction: Effects on growth performance in small, start-up firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(1), 34–36. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2009.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2006). In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 26(1), 30–41. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostgaard, T. A., & Birley, S. (1995). New venture competitive strategies and their relation to growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7, 119–141. doi:10.1080/08985629500000008
   Google Scholar
• Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40, 228–240. doi:10.2307/41165952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators (pp. 56–85). New York, NY: The Oxford Handbook Of Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (2003). Saving capitalism from the capitalists. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. C. (2014). Intangible resources as drivers of high growth. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 145–165. doi:10.1142/s1363919614500212
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. W. (1999). Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 655–670. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199907)20:7<655::aid-smj44>3.0.co;2-p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management (pp. 556–570). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, M., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 229–255. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9093-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapienza, H., & Grimm, C. (1997). Founder characteristics, start-up process and strategy/structure variables as predictors of short-line railroad performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Creative destruction. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High-growth firms and innovation: An empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, 43, 805–821. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9563-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387–394. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkie, R. (2003). Knowledge creation and its place in the development of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 20–31. doi:10.1108/13673270310463590
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, R., Siegel, E., & MacMillan, I. C. (1993). Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 169–180. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(93)90018-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556. doi:10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S., & Massini, S. (1998). Employment creation in small technological and design innovators in the UK during 1980s. Small Business Economics, 11(4), 353–370. doi:10.1023/a:1008065115819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1741–1758. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28(1), 63–80. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00106-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemon, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29, 423–437. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, T. F. L. (2001). Toward a capabilities perspective of the small firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 185–197. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 319–340. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar