A practice theoretical perspective on the Europeanization of spatial planning

References

• Adams, N. (2008). Convergence and policy transfer: An examination of the extent to which approaches to spatial planning have converged within the context of an enlarged EU. International Planning Studies, 13, 31–49. doi:10.1080/13563470801969608
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N., Cotella, G., & Nunes, R. (Eds.). (2010). Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning. Knowledge and policy development in an enlarged EU. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–633. doi:10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I. (2003). Europeanization: A governance approach. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/1722/
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., Bulmer, S., & Gunay, D. (2012). Europeanization: A critical realist perspective. In T. Exadaktylos & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), Research design in European studies: Establishing causality in Europeanization (pp. 64–84). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, V. (2016). Spaces of interaction: Enactments of sociospatial relations and an emerging EU diplomacy in Kenya. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 75–96. doi:10.1080/21622671.2015.1005124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blekinge Institute of Technology. (2015). Joint Masters Programme in European spatial planning, environmental policies and regional development. Retrieved from http://edu.bth.se/utbildning/utb_program.asp?PtKod=FMAJP15h
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., & Waterhout, B. (2008). The Europeanisation of planning. In A. Faludi (Ed.), European spatial research and planning (pp. 225–248). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C. (2014). Pathways to practice: Praxiography and international politics. European Political Science Review, 6, 383–406. doi:10.1017/S1755773913000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Jones, A. (2008). The spatialities of Europeanisation: Territory, government and power in ‘EUrope’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 300–318. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. R. A., & Jones, A. R. (2009). Europeanisation and its discontents. Space and Polity, 13, 193–212. doi:10.1080/13562570903454291
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G., & Janin Rivolin, U. (2011). Europeanization of spatial planning through discourse and practice in Italy. disP – The Planning Review, 47, 42–53. doi:10.1080/02513625.2011.10557143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2003). Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11, 979–999. doi:10.1080/0965431032000146169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2005). Understanding territorial cohesion. Planning Practice and Research, 20, 433–441. doi:10.1080/02697450600767926
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). An insider’s look into policy transfer in transnational expert networks. European Planning Studies, 15, 687–706. doi:10.1080/09654310701213996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., & Rumford, C. (2005). Rethinking Europe. Social theory and the implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Stead, D., & Zonneveld, W. (2007). The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation. Planning Practice and Research, 22, 291–307. doi:10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, K. (2009). The evolving timescapes of European economic governance: Contesting and using time. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(2), 286–306. doi:10.1080/13501760802589313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eser, T. W., & Konstadakopulos, D. (2000). Power shifts in the European Union? The case of spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 8, 783–798. doi:10.1080/713666438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2015). Guidance for stakeholder proposals for ESPON targeted analysis. Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/HowToApply/CallsAndProcurements/InvitationStakeholders/Stakeholder_guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Contributions to the consultation. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/contrib_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. (2008). Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 99, 303–315. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everts, J. (2016). Connecting sites: Practice theory and large phenomena. Geographische Zeitschrift, 104, 50–67.
   Google Scholar
• Everts, J., Lahr-Kurten, M., & Watson, M. (2011). Practice matters! Geographical inquiry and theories of practice. Erdkunde, 65, 232–334. doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2011.04.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (Eds.). (2012). Research design in European studies: Establishing causality in Europeanization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2008). The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1470–1484. doi:10.1068/a39225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009a). Territorial cohesion under the looking glass: Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/pdf/lookingglass.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009b). A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’. Progress in Planning, 71, 1–42. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2014). EUropeanisation or Europeanisation of spatial planning? Planning Theory & Practice, 15, 155–169. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.902095
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. (2008). The Europeanization of Europe: The transfer of norms to Europe, in Europe and from Europe (DIIS Working Paper 2008/7). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T. (2010). Europeanization or EU-ization? The transfer of European Norms across time and space. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48, 787–810. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02074.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, G. (2012). The Europeanization of national planning: Explaining the causes and the potentials of change. Planning Practice and Research, 27, 117–135. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.661195
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796. doi:10.1080/13501760500161357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A., & Richardson, T. (2007). New region, new story: Imagining mobile subjects in transnational space. Space and Polity, 11, 137–150. doi:10.1080/13562570701722014
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O., & Richardson, T. (2004). Making European space: Mobility, power and territorial identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jerneck, M. (2000). Europeanization, territoriality and political time. Yearbook of European Studies, 14, 27–49. doi:10.1163/9789004333369_004
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanization of national administrations: Patterns of institutional change and persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R. (2008). Futures for European Space 2020. Journal of Nordregio, 8, 12–15, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2011). Whose regional expertise? Political geographies of knowledge in the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18, 275–288. doi:10.1177/0969776411406034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladi, S. (2011). Policy change and soft Europeanization: The transfer of the Ombudsman Institution to Greece, Cyprus and Malta. Public Administration, 89(4), 1643–1663. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01929.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2003). The ‘usefulness’ of learning: The struggle over governance, meaning and the European education space. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24, 325–336. doi:10.1080/0159630032000172515
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2015). Planning in Europe for ‘EU’rope: Spatial planning as a political technology of territory. Planning Theory, 14, 174–194. doi:10.1177/1473095213519355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S., Jones, J. P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 416–432. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A., & Nuttall, S. (2004). Writing the world from an African metropolis. Public Culture, 16, 347–372. doi:10.1215/08992363-16-3-347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44, 42–51. doi:10.1068/a44178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., & Goetz, K. H. (2009). The EU timescape: From notion to research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(2), 325–336. doi:10.1080/13501760802589404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., & Luukkonen, J. (2015). European spatial planning as governmentality: An inquiry into rationalities, techniques, and manifestations. Environment and Planning C, 33, 828–845. doi:10.1068/c13158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2008). If geography is anything, maybe it’s planning’s alter ego? Reflections on policy relevance in two disciplines concerned with place and space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 566–584. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2016). The spaces in between: Mobile policy and the topographies and topologies of the technocracy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 420–437. doi:10.1177/0263775815618401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. (2003). The Europeanization of public policy. In K. Featherstone & C. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., Green Cowles, M., & Caporaso, J. (2001). Europeanization and domestic change: Introduction. In M. Green Cowles, J. Caporaso, & T. Risse (Eds.), Europeanization and domestic change: Transforming Europe (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2015). ‘Arriving at’ urban policies: The topological spaces of urban policy mobility. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 831–834. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1991). Spatial ontology and explanation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 650–670. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1991.tb01713.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2006). The time of activity. Continental Philosophy Review, 39, 155–182. doi:10.1007/s11007-006-9026-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2015). Spaces of practices and of large social phenomena. Retrieved from http://www.espacestemps.net
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy change and discourse in Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics, 27, 183–210. doi:10.1080/0140238042000214874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. (2010). Territorial cohesion discourses: Hegemonic strategic concepts in European spatial planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 11, 397–416. doi:10.1080/14649357.2010.500135
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2012). Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27, 103–116. doi:10.1080/02697459.2011.644084
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W., & Haahr, J. H. (2005). Governing Europe: Discourse, governmentality and European integration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2007). Episodes of Europeanization of Dutch national spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 22, 309–327. doi:10.1080/02697450701666696
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. H. (1996). European Union spatial policy and planning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wishlade, F., Yuill, D., & Mendez, C. (2004). Regional policy in the EU: A passing phase of Europeanisation or a complex case of policy transfer? (European Policy Research Papers; No. 50). Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar