2,271
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Revisiting the growth coalition concept to analyse the success of the Crossrail London megaproject

Pages 314-331 | Received 30 Jul 2015, Accepted 12 Dec 2016, Published online: 04 Jan 2017

References

  • Allport, R., Brown, R., Glaister, S., & Travers, T. (2008). Success and failure in urban transport infrastructure projects. Technical report.
  • Authority, G. L. (2010). Intention to levy a business rate supplement to finance the Greater London. London: Authority’s contribution to the Crossrail project–Final Prospectus, 136 p.
  • Cochrane, A. (1999). Redefining urban politics for the twenty first century. In Andrew E. Jonas & D. Wilson (Eds.), The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later pp. 109–124. New-York: Suny Press.
  • Davies, A., MacAulay, S., DeBarro, T., & Thurston, M. (2014). Making innovation happen in a megaproject: London’s Crossrail suburban railway system. Project Management Journal, 45(6), 25–37. doi:10.1002/pmj.21461
  • Dimitriou, H. T. (2014). What constitutes a successful mega transport project? Planning, Theory and Practice, 15(3), 389–430. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.935084
  • Dulake, C. (2011). Crossrail-design and construction/Crossrail-Entwurf. Bemessung und Ausführung, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 4(5), 592–604. doi:10.1002/geot.201100028
  • Fainstein, S. (2008a). Crossrail (B): The politics of approval. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government Case Programme (Case # 1899.0).
  • Fainstein, S. (2008b). Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 768–785. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00826.x
  • Fergusson, J. C. (2001). Crossrail: Scope, background and feasibility. Proceedings of the ICE-Transport, 147(2), 61–69. doi:10.1680/tran.2001.147.2.61
  • Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Giezen, M., Bertolini, L., & Salet, W. (2015). Adaptive capacity within a mega project: A case study on planning and decision-making in the face of complexity. European Planning Studies, 23(5), 999–1018. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.916254
  • Glaister, S., & Travers, T. (2001). Crossing London: Overcoming the obstacles to CrossRail. Public Money and Management, 21(4), 11–18. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00280
  • Gomez-Ibanez, J.-A. (2008). Crossrail (A): The business case. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government Case Programme (Case # 1898.0).
  • Great Britain. Dept. of Transport, London Regional Transport (Agency), & British Rail (Firm). (1989). Central London rail study. London: Department of Transport.
  • Harding, A. (1991). The rise of urban growth coalitions, UK-style? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 9(3), 295–317. doi:10.1068/c090295
  • Hebbert, M. (2012). Megaproject as keyhole surgery: London Crossrail. Built Environment, 38(1), 89–102. doi:10.2148/benv.38.1.89
  • Hebbert, M. (2014). Crossrail: The slow route to London’s regional express railway. Town Planning Review, 85(2), 171–190. doi:10.3828/tpr.2014.11
  • Jonas, A. E., & Wilson, D. (1999). The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later. New York: Suny Press.
  • Lamari, M., & Prévost, J. R. (2014). Ex ante evaluation of mega-project in a time of uncertainty: What counts and what is countable in the Canadian context? Retrieved May 24, 2015, from http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_35464.pdf
  • Lehrer, U., & Laidley, J. (2008). Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 786–803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x
  • London First. (2014). Funding Crossrail 2. A report from London First 's Crossrail 2 task force. London. Retrieved from http://londonfirst.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/LF_CROSSRAIL2_REPORT_2014_Single_Pages.pdf
  • Majoor, S. (2015). Urban megaprojects in crisis? Ørestad Copenhagen Revisited. European Planning Studies, 23(12), 2497–2515. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1014780
  • McConnell, A. (2010). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362. doi:10.1017/S0143814X10000152
  • McConnell, A. (2015). What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 221–242. doi:10.1177/0952076714565416
  • Meeks, R., Last, A., & Upfold, B. (2002). London’s Crossrail project appraisal framework. London: Association for European Transport. 
  • Merrow, E., & Merrow, E. W. (1988). Understanding the Outcomes of Mega-projects, published by the Rand publication series. Retrieved March 24, 2015, from http://content.lib.utah.edu/utils/getfile/collection/ir-eua/id/1213/filename/1826.pdf
  • Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332. doi:10.1086/226311
  • Molotch, H., & Logan, J. (1984). Tensions in the growth machine: Overcoming resistance to value-free development. Social Problems, 31(5), 483–499. doi:10.2307/800236
  • Molotch, H., & Logan, J. R. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996) Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems, and planning projects. London: Psychology Press.
  • Nuno, G., & Lundrigan, C. (2013). Crossrail: The Perfect Storm (A). Megaproject Leadership and Governance Case Study Series. Manchester: The University of Manchester. Retrieved May 24, 2015, from https://research.mbs.ac.uk/infrastructure/Portals/0/docs/Crossrail%20The%20Perfect%20Storm%20A.pdf
  • Orueta, F. D., & Fainstein, S. (2008). The New mega-projects: Genesis and impacts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 759–767. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00829.x
  • Priemus, H. (2010). Decision-making on mega-projects: Drifting on political discontinuity and market dynamics. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research (EJTIR), 10(1), 19–29.
  • Roukouni, A., & Medda, F. (2012). Evaluation of value capture mechanisms as a funding source for urban transport: The case of London’s Crossrail. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 2393–2404. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1210 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1210
  • Salet, W., Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2013). Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1984–2000. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01133.x
  • Salet, W. G., Thornley, A., & Kreukels, A. (2003). Metropolitan governance and spatial planning comparative case studies of European city-regions. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Schabas, M. (2005). Paying for Crossrail: The business case. Economic Affairs, 25(1), 12–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0270.2005.00537.x
  • Sfez, L. (1992). Critique de la décision. Paris: Presses de la fondation nationale des sciences politiques.
  • Strom, E. (1996). In search of the growth coalition: American urban theories and the redevelopment of berlin. Urban Affairs Review, 31(4), 455–481. doi:10.1177/107808749603100402
  • Surborg, B., VanWynsberghe, R., & Wyly, E. (2008). Mapping the Olympic growth machine: Transnational urbanism and the growth machine diaspora. City, 12(3), 341–355. doi:10.1080/13604810802478920
  • Szyliowicz, J. S., & Goetz, A. R. (1995). Getting realistic about megaproject planning: The case of the new Denver International Airport. Policy Sciences, 28(4), 347–367. doi:10.1007/BF01000249
  • Terhorst, P., & Van De Ven, J. (1995). The national urban growth coalition in the Netherlands. Political Geography, 14(4), 343–361. doi:10.1016/0962-6298(95)95718-D
  • Travers, T. (2009). Transport infrastructure in London. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3), 451–468. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grp029
  • Ward, E.-J., Wright, P.-J., & Dimitriou, H.-T. (2014). Perspective on success from the channel tunnel rail link project? Planning, Theory and Practice, 15(3), 389–430. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.935084

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.