Polycentricity – one concept or many?

References

• Bachtler, J., & Polverari, L. (2007). Delivering territorial cohesion: European cohesion policy and the European model of society. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 105–128). Cambridge, MA: The Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Borbély, L. (2011). Regional development from the perspective of polycentrism. Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 7(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Borges, L., & Johansson, M. (2012, August 21–25). SGI and territorial structures: European experiences. A paper presented at the ERSA conference, Bratislava.
   Google Scholar
• Brezzi, M., & Veneri, P. (2015). Assessing polycentric urban systems in the OECD: Country, regional and metropolitan perspectives. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1128–1145. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.905005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, M., & Meijers, E. (2012). Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1127–1149. doi:10.1177/0042098011407095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2007). Territorial development policies in the European model of society. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 129–144). Cambridge, MA: The Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (1999). European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2011). Cities of tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2014a). Sixth progress report on economic and social cohesion. Brussels: Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2014b). The urban dimension of EU policies – key features of an EU Urban Agenda. COM(2014) 490 final.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, P. (1995). A new phase of urban development in Western Europe? The evidence for the 1980s. Urban Studies, 32(7), 1045–1063. doi:10.1080/00420989550012564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copus, A. K. (2001). From core-periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies, 9(4), 539–552. doi:10.1080/09654310120049899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2002, April 18–20). Polycentricity: What does it mean and how is it interpreted in the ESDP? A paper presented at the EURA conference urban and spatial European policies: Levels of territorial government in Turin.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2003). European briefing: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8), 979–999. doi:10.1080/0965431032000146169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Goei, B., Burger, M. J., & Van Oort, F. G. (2010). Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the greater South East, United Kingdom: Evidence from commuting patterns, 1981–2001. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1149–1170. doi:10.1080/00343400903365102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskilinen, H., & Fritsch, M. (2009). Polycentricity in the North-eastern periphery of the EU territory. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 605–619. doi:10.1080/09654310802682206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2005). Potentials for polycentric development in Europe ( Project 1.1.1). Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2007). Functional urban regions ( Project 1.4.3). Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2004). The European spatial development perspective and North-west Europe: Application and the future. European Planning Studies, 12(3), 391–408. doi:10.1080/0965431042000195010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2005). Polycentric territorial cohesion policy. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 107–118. doi:10.3828/tpr.76.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2007). The European model of society. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, MA: The Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2015). The “Blue Banana” revisited (Refereed article no. 56). European Journal of Spatial Development, 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereedarticles/Refereed_56.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., Stead, D., & Humer, A. (2015). Conclusions: Services of general interest, territorial cohesion and competitiveness in Europe. In H. Fassmann, D. Rauhut, E. Marques da Costa, & A. Humer (Eds.), Services of general interest and territorial cohesion. European perspectives and national insights (pp. 259–267). Göttingen: V&R unipress.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, C. B. (1932). Distribution of the urban population in Great Britain, 1931. The Geographical Journal, 79, 100–113. doi:10.2307/1785089
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in evolution. London: Williams and Margate.
   Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. (2009). Polycentricity: Can we make it happen? From a concept to its implementation. Urban Research and Practice, 2(3), 251–268. doi:10.1080/17535060903319145
   Google Scholar
• Giffinger, R., & Suitner, J. (2015). Polycentric metropolitan development: From structural assessment to processual dimensions. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1169–1186. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.905007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gløersen, E., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., & Dubois, A. (2007). Polycentricity in transnational planning initiatives: ESDP applied or ESDP reinvented? Planning, Practice & Research, 22(3), 417–437. doi:10.1080/02697450701666761
   Google Scholar
• Governa, F., & Salone, C. (2005). Italy and European spatial policies: Polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices. European Planning Studies, 13(2), 265–283. doi:10.1080/0965431042000321820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, N. (2007). Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, 44(11), 2077–2103. doi:10.1080/00420980701518941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2008). Territorial cohesion as a category of agency: The missing dimension in the EU spatial policy debate ( refereed article no. 28). European Journal of Spatial Development, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereedarticles/refereed28.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Pain, K. (2006). The polycentric metropolis. Learning from mega-city regions in Europe. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C., & Ullman, E. (1945). The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 242, 7–17. doi: 10.1177/000271624524200103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (1898). Tomorrow: A path to real reform. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M. (2002). Polycentric urban structures in Sweden – conditions and prospects. In C. Bengs (Ed.), Facing ESPON (pp. 99–117). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, R. C., & Musterd, S. (2001). The polycentric urban region: Towards a research agenda. Urban Studies, 38(4), 623–633. doi:10.1080/00420980120035259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1961). The pattern of metropolis. Daedalus, 90(Winter), 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., & Rodwin, L. (1958). A theory of urban form. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 24(Fall), 201–214. doi: 10.1080/01944365808978281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2013). Assessing territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese case. European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1960–1988. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.813910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. (2008). Measuring polycentricity and its promises. European Planning Studies, 16(9), 1313–1323. doi:10.1080/09654310802401805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E., & Sandberg, K. (2006). Polycentric development to combat regional disparities? The relation between polycentricity and regional disparities in European countries, ERSA conference papers, European Regional Science Association. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa06p287.html
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, E., & Sandberg, K. (2008). Reducing regional disparities by means of polycentric development: Panacea or placebo? Scienze Regionali, 7(2), 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, E., Waterhout, B., & Zonneveld, W. (2007). Closing the gap: Territorial cohesion through polycentric development. European Journal of Spatial Development, 1–24. Retrieved from www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereedarticles/refereed24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. (1938). The culture of cities. New York, NY: Secker & Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, P., Rauhut, D., & Humer, A. (2015, August 25–29). Polycentricity and social services of general interest: A multivariate analysis. A paper prepared for the 55th European Congress of Regional Science International, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. B. (2008). Cities and regions: Problems and potentials. Environment and Planning A, 40, 3009–3026. doi:10.1068/a40217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, D. (2003). Cohesion, polycentricity, missing links and bottlenecks: Conflicting spatial storylines for pan-European transport investments. European Planning Studies, 11(3), 317–339. doi:10.1080/0965431032000070811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riguelle, F., Thomas, I., & Verhetsel, A. (2007). Measuring urban polycentrism: A European case study and its implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(2), 193–215. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, K. P. (2009). Territorial cohesion – current views of the commission and the member states of the European union. In H. Kilper (Ed.), New disparities in spatial development in Europe (pp. 7–17). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (1988). Metropolis: From the division of labour to urban form. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Morais Mourato, J. (2005). Territorial cohesion, economic growth and the desire for European “balanced competitiveness”. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 69–80. doi:10.3828/tpr.76.1.6
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. (1973). The separation of home and workplace. In P. Hall, H. Gracey, R. Drewett, & R. Thomas (Eds.), The planning systems, objectives, operations, impacts. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Van Criekingen, M., Bachmann, M., Guisset, C., & Lennert, M. (2007). Towards polycentric cities. An investigation into the restructuring of intra-metropolitan spatial configurations in Europe. Belgeo, 2007(1), 2–19. Retrieved from http://belgeo.revues.org/11629
   Google Scholar
• Vandermotten, C., Halbert, L., Roelandts, M., & Cornut, P. (2008). European planning and the polycentric consensus: Wishful thinking? Regional Studies, 42(8), 1205–1217. doi:10.1080/00343400701874206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M., Poorthuis, A., Derudder, B., & Witlox, F. (2015). Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1278–1298. doi:10.1177/0042098015573455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneri, P., & Burgalassi, D. (2012). Questioning polycentric development and its effects. Issues of definition and measurement for the Italian NUTS-2 regions. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 1017–1037. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.673566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2002). Polycentric development. What is behind it? In A. Faludi (Ed.), European spatial planning (pp. 83–104). Cambridge, MA: The Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Zonneveld, W., & Meijers, E. (2005). Polycentric development policies in Europe: Overview and debate. Built Environment, 31(2), 163–173. doi:10.2148/benv.31.2.163.66250
   Google Scholar
• Wurster, C. B. (1963). The form and structure of the future urban complex. In L. Wingo (Ed.), Cities and space. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Swiatek, D., & Zuber, P. (2014). Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246–267. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar