Regional paths towards Europe 2020 targets: a spatial approach

References

• Amable, B. (2009). Structural reforms in Europe and the (in)coherence of institutions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), 17–39. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grp001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–115. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 77–104. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasoglou, S., & Dijkstra, L. (2014). The Europe 2020 regional index. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report: prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/regi/dv/barca_report_/barca_report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2011). Alternative Approaches to Development policy: Intersections and Divergences. In OECD (Ed.), OECD Regional outlook 2011: Building Resilient Regions for Stronger Economies (pp. 215–225). OECD. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264120983-17-en.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. J., & Gómez-Rubio, V. (2008). Applied spatial data analysis with R. Secaucus, NJ: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2011, July 18–19). Local knowledge, national vision: Challenges and prospects for the EU regional policy. Post-seminar publication, Polish Ministry of Regional Development, Ostróda.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU Regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389. doi:10.1111/grow.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camaioni, B., Esposti, R., Lobianco, A., Pagliacci, F., & Sotte, F. (2013). How rural the EU RDP is? An analysis through spatial funds allocation. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 2(3), 277–300. doi:10.13128/BAE-13092
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, A., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: Models and applications. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Coderoni S., & Pagliacci, F. (2016, September 20–22). The Territorial dimension of environmental sustainability in Italy. The role of rural regions. Paper presented at the XXXVII Conferenza Italiana di Scienze Regionali, Ancona.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions. (2014). An indicator for measuring regional progress towards the Europe 2020 targets. European Union. Retrieved from http://cor.europa.eu/en/documentation/studies/Documents/RPI-Final-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P. (2012). Conclusions: The Lisbon strategy – Evaluating success and understanding failure. In P. Copeland & D. Papadimitriou (Eds.), The EU’s Lisbon strategy: Evaluating success, understanding failure (pp. 229–237). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Copus, A. K., Psaltopoulos, D., Skuras, D., Terluin, I., & Weingarten, P. (2008). Approaches to rural typology in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). Infrastructure and regional growth in the European Union. Papers in Regional Science, 91(3), 487–513. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00439.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroose, S., Hodson, D., & Kulhmann, J. (2008). The broad economic policy guidelines: Before and after the re-launch of the Lisbon strategy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(4), 827–848. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Rural areas and the Europe 2020 strategy: education. Agricultural Economics Briefs. No. 4, 1–9. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/04_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2000, March 23–24). Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2001, June 15–16). Presidency Conclusions. Goteborg European Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2010, March 25–26) Presidency Conclusions. Brussels European Council.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2010). A revised urban-rural typology. In Eurostat (Ed.), Eurostat regional yearbook 2010 (pp. 239–253). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2014). Place is a no-man’s land. Geographia Polonica, 88(1), 5–20. doi:10.7163/GPol.2015.1
   Google Scholar
• Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2011). Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1089–1111. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, G., & White, S. (2000). Alternative to census-based indicators of social disadvantage in rural communities. Progress in Planning, 53(1), 1–81. doi:10.1016/S0305-9006(99)00021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopner, M., & Schafer, A. (2007). A new phase of European Integration: Organized capitalism in post-Ricardian Europe. Max Planck Discussion Paper Series, 07/04, 1–27. Retrieved from http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp07-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417–441. doi:10.1037/h0071325
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, W. (2004). Report from the high level group: Facing the challenge – The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Brussels: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499. doi:10.1086/261763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maione, M., Fowler, D., Monks, P., Reis, S., Rudich, Y., Williams, M., & Fuzzi, S. (2016). Air quality and climate change: Designing new win-win policies for Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 65, 48–57. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2016). Territorial Cohesion: An EU concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, 60. Retrieved April 2016 from: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/Refereed_60.pdf. Online publication date.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17–23. doi:10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natali, D. (2010). The Lisbon strategy, Europe 2020 and the crisis in between. European social observatory deliverable. Brussels: OSE.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1994). Creating rural indicators for shaping territorial policy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). The New Rural Paradigm. Policies and Governance. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliacci, F. (2016). Measuring EU urban-rural continuum through fuzzy logic. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/tesg.12201
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine Series 6, 2, 559–572. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princenton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M. J. (2002). The new knowledge economy in Europe – A strategy for international competitiveness and social cohesion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (1999). Convergence or divergence? Types of regional responses to socioeconomic change. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 90, 365–78. doi:10.1111/1467-9663.00079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2004). Is there a global link between regional disparities and devolution? Environment and Planning A, 36, 2097–2117. doi:10.1068/a362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir, A., (Ed.). (2004). An agenda for growing Europe. The Sapir Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, A. (2006). Globalization and the reform of European social model. Journal of Common Market Studied, 44(2), 369–390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir, A. (2014). Still the right agenda for Europe? The Sapir Report ten years on. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(S1), 57–73. doi:10.1111/jcms.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smismans, S. (2008). New modes of governance and the participatory myth. West European Politics, 31(5), 874–895. doi:10.1080/01402380802234540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, W. C., Anderson, O. M., & Taylor Lovell, S. (2004). Agricultural buffers at the rural-urban fringe: An examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the midwestern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2–3), 299–313. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TA. (2011). Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011, Gödöllő, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• TA. (2007). Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the Occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion on 24–25 May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, D. M. (2001). Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban-fringe. Geographical Review, 91(3), 544–564. doi:10.2307/3594740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46, 234–240. doi:10.2307/143141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. (2003, August 28–31). The Lisbon strategy and the open method of coordination: A new vision and the revolutionary potential of soft governance in the European Union. Paper presented at American Political Science Association Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, C., Eiden, G., & Hay, K. (2005). Agriculture as a key issue for rural development in the European Union (Working Paper No. 3). UN Economic Commission for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330–336. doi:10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1968). Fuzzy algorithms. Information and Control, 12, 94–102. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(68)90211-8
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2014). Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246–267. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. (2007). Reinforcement de la dimension sociale de la Strategie de Lisbonne. Revue belge de sécurité sociale, 2, 459–473. Retrieved from http://socialsecurity.belgium.be/fr/publications/rbss/edition-2-2007
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. (2008). The open method of co-ordination and the governance of the Lisbon strategy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 436–450. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00785.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar