Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea

References

• Abernathy, W. J., & Chakravarthy, B. S. (1978). Government intervention and innovation in industry: A policy framework. Sloan Management Review, 20(3), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Zoubi, M. O. (2016). The entrepreneurial process networks as a new theoretical framework for understanding and analyzing the practice of creating a new business venture. Journal of Management Research, 8(3), 60–75. doi:10.5296/jmr.v8i3.9449
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. P. (2014). Not just neoliberalism: Economization in US science and technology policy. Science Technology Human Values, 39(3), 397–431. doi:10.1177/0162243913509123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, F. (2008). Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics & Society, 36(2), 169–206. doi:10.1177/0032329208318731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøllingtoft, A. (2012). The bottom-up business incubator: Leverage to networking and cooperation practices in a self-generated, entrepreneurial-enabled environment. Technovation, 32(5), 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breznitz, D. (2007). Innovation and the state: Political choice and strategies for growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, D., & Cowhey, P. (2012). America's two systems of innovation: Innovation for production in fostering US growth. Innovations, 7(3), 127–154. doi:10.1162/INOV_a_00143
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Application of Q-methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q-methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91–138. doi:10.15133/j.os.1993.002
   Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, A. (2006). Institutions, entrepreneurship and the rationale of government: An outline of the Schumpeterian theory of the state. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 59(4), 497–515. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, A. (2007). Public policy, governance, and innovation: Entrepreneurial states in East Asian economic development. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 3(1), 103–124. doi:10.1504/IJTG.2007.012363
   Google Scholar
• Engel, J. S., & del-Palacio, I. (2011). Global clusters of innovation: The case of Israel and Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 53(2), 27–49. doi:10.1525/cmr.2011.53.2.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42, 293–337. doi:10.1177/05390184030423002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel, A., & Maital, S. (2014). Mapping national innovation ecosystems: Foundations for policy consensus. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D. (2013). Worthless, impossible and stupid: How contrarian entrepreneurs create and capture extraordinary value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janeway, W. (2013). Doing capitalism in the innovation economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. S., & Kim, M. (2014). Promoting the financing of SMEs and start-ups in Korea. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1162, OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. (2015). Issues and Challenges of Center of Creative Economy Innovation. Seoul: NARS (National Assembly Research Service) Report. The National Assembly of South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. (2000). Technology, learning, and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. (2010). The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics, 35(3), 255–264. doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9298-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2014). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. Private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKweon, B. F., & Thomas, B. D. (1988). Q-methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Reviews of innovation policy. Industry and technology policies in Korea. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Okimoto, D. I. (1989). Between MITI and the market: Japanese industrial policy for high technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senor, D., & Singer, S. (2009). Start-up nation: The story of Israel's economic miracle. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Leaders and followers: Perspectives on the Nordic model and the economics of innovation. Journal of Public Economics, 127, 3–16. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, M. A. (2014). South Korea: Plutocratic state-led capitalism reconfiguring. In A. Michael (Ed.), Witt and Gordon redding. The Oxford handbook of Asian business systems (pp. 216–237). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. (2005). Re-making the developmental state in Taiwan: The challenges of biotechnology. International Political Science Review, 26(2), 169–191. doi:10.1177/0192512105050380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar