A connectivity model as a potential tool for smart specialization strategies

References

• AMCER report. (2012). Advanced monitoring and coordination of EU R&D policies at regional level (Report). Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/AMCER/DFR/AMCER_Draft_Final_Report_v1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2013). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. 64–81). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2016). Four minutes to four years: The advantage of recombinant over specialized innovation – RIS3 versus ‘smartspec’. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1494–1510. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1151482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., … Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). Europe: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Goenaga, X. (2013). The goals of smart specialization (S3 Policy Brief Series, 1). Europe: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Rinoldi, A. (2013). Smart specialisation programmes and implementation (S3 Policy Brief Series, 2). Europe: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (2013). Universities and smart specialisation: Challenges, tensions, and opportunities for the innovation strategies of European regions. Ekonomiaz, 83.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. Retrieved from https://sociology.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/the_strength_of_weak_ties_and_exch_w-gans.pdf doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V. (2006). Regional development platform method (RDPM) as a tool for regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 1085–1104. doi:10.1080/09654310600852399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603–633. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialisation in practice – leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23, 2079–2098. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science & Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203. doi:10.1093/spp/25.3.195
   Google Scholar
• Mariussen, Å, Gjertsen, A., Løvland, J., & Lindeløv, B. (2013). Smart 4H: Forslag til smart spesialisering for Nordland (NF Rapport 4/2013). Bodø: Nordlandsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Mariussen, Å, & Virkkala, S. (2013). Methodologies and methods of transnational learning. In Å. Mariussen, & S. Virkkala (Eds.), Learning transnational learning (pp. 155–195). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, D., & Richardson, K. (2016). How smart is England’s approach to smart specialization? A policy paper. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1478–1493. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1179267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäenpää, A. (2014). Methodology and research design. In S. Virkkala, A. Mäenpää, & Å. Mariussen (Eds.), The Ostrobothnian model of smart specialization (pp. 49–65). Proceedings of the University of Vaasa, Reports 196. Vaasa: Vaasan yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6, 187–216. doi:10.1093/cjres/rst007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1407–1427. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1166177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers, C., Magro, E., Aranguren, M., Navarro, M., Wilson, J., Trippl, M., … Healy, A. (2014). Underpinning effective strategy design: Smart specialisation for regional innovation (Work package 4) [Reflection paper]. Retrieved from http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/cplan/sites/default/files/Underpinning%20Effective%20Strategy%20Design.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry & Higher Education, 27(3), 237–262. doi:10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
   Google Scholar
• Ranta, J.-M., & Takala, J. (2007). A holistic method for finding out critical features of industry maintenance services. International Journal Services and Standards, 3(3), 312–325. doi:10.1504/IJSS.2007.013752
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. (1992). Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development (Working paper No.102). New York, NY: Colombia University School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkala, S., Johnson, J., & Mariussen, Å. (2014). Summary and conclusion. In S. Virkkala, A. Mäenpää, & Å. Mariussen (Eds.), The Ostrobothnian model of smart specialisation (pp. 118–132). Proceedings of the University of Vaasa, Reports 196. Vaasa: Vaasan yliopisto.
   Google Scholar