Policy governance from an autopoietic perspective: revisiting Hungary’s regionalization experience

References

• Ágh, A. (2001). A régiók magyarországa [The Hungary of regions]. Comitatus, 11, 102–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A. (2004). Europeanization and regionalization: The Hungarian accession. Budapest: Hungarian Centre for Democracy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A. (2010). Post-accession crisis in the new member states: Progressing or backsliding in the EU? Studies of Transition States and Societies, 2(1), 74–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A., Rózsás, Á., & Zongor, G. (2004). Európaizálás és regionalizálás Magyarországon [Europeanisation and regionalisation in Hungary]. Budapest: ÖnKorPress Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007). Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1161–1175. doi:10.1080/00343400701543348 doi: 10.1080/00343400701543348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2010). Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antipode, 42(5), 1071–1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2004). Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 86, 33–44. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x
   Google Scholar
• Andor, L. (2000). Hungary on the road to the European Union. Transition in blue. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M., & Holland, M. C. (2014). Territorial attachment in the age of globalization: The case of Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(2), 206–221. doi:10.1177/0969776412445830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barta, G. (1999). Industrial restructuring in the Budapest agglomeration. Discussion papers of the Centre for Regional Studies, No. 30. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from www.rkk.hu
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, A. (2000). Térségi identitás [Spatial identity]. In Gy. Horváth & I. Kovács Pálné (Eds.), Területfejlesztés és közigazgatás-szervezés (Spatial development and administrative organisation) (pp. 111–127). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11, 447–488. doi: 10.1080/0969229042000282864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). After neoliberalisation? Globalizations, 7(3), 327–345. doi:10.1080/14747731003669669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusis, M. (2005). The instrumental use of European Union conditionality: Regionalisation in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. East European Politics & Societies, 19, 291–316. doi:10.1177/0888325404272063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A., & Korkut, U. (2013). Administrative reform and regional development discourses in Hungary. Europeanisation going NUTS? Europe Asia Studies, 65(8), 1555–1577. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.833015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. (Eds.). (2009). Conceptions of space and place in strategic spatial planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dezséri, K., Meisel, S., & Rácz, M. (2000). Hungary. In H. Tang (Ed.), Winners and losers of EU integration: Policy issues for Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 144–161). Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Elander, I. (1997). Between centralism and localism: On the development of local self-government in postsocialist Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(2), 143–159. doi:10.1068/c150143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, D. (2008). Subnational regionalism in a supranational context: The case of Hungary. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 8(1), 60–87.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, G. (1998). Transformation in Central European postsocialist cities. Discussion papers of the Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, no. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Faragó, L. (2005). The driving forces of regionalism in Hungary. In Gy. Barta, É. G. Fekete, I. Szörényiné Kukorelli, & J. Timár (Eds.), Hungarian spaces and places: Patterns of transition (pp. 73–91). Pécs: Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, K., & Ozstvald, E. (2010). The geography of the 2009–2010 crisis – The case of Hungary. In G. Gorzelak & C. Goh (Eds.), Financial crisis in Central and Eastern Europe: From similarity to diversity (pp. 91–105). Warsaw: Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M. (2015). Cohesion policy and its components: Past, present and future. GRINCOH WP 8 Report. Retrieved February 25, 2015, from http://www.grincoh.eu/deliverables
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, B. (2002). Hungary: Patterns of political conflict over territorial-administrative reform. Regional and Federal Studies, 12(2), 15–40. doi:10.1080/714004739
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2003). Structuration theory and self-organization. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(4), 133–167. doi:10.1023/A:1022889627100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdú, Z. (2007). State development, regionalisation and decentralisation processes in Central and Eastern Europe in the time of the systemic changes (1989–2005). In I. Kovács Pálné (Eds.), HÉTFA regional decentralization in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 7–30). Pécs: University of Pécs Department of Political Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdú, Z., & Kovács, I. (Eds.). (2003). Portrait of south transdanubia: A region in transition. Pécs: Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Haslett, B. H. (2013). Communicating and organizing in context: The theory of structurational interaction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HÉTFA Centre for Analysis. (2013). Expert evaluation network delivering policy analysis on the performance of Cohesion Policy 2007–2013. Year 3–2013. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/eval2007/2013_een_task2_hu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, G. (1999). Changing Hungarian regional policy and accession to the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(2), 166–177. doi:10.1177/096977649900600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, G. (2010). Regionalism in a unitary state. The case of Hungary. In R. Scully, & R. Wyn Jones (Eds.), Europe, regions and European regionalism (pp. 184–202). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Sasse, G., & Gordon, C. E. (2004). Europeanization and regionalization in the EU’s enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The myth of conditionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., & Varró, K. (2014). Rethinking cross-border Euregionalism as self-organising system. Space and Polity, 18(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/13562576.2013.880009
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00107
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2001a). Regulationist and autopoieticist reflections on Polanyi’s account of market economies and the market society. New Political Economy, 6(2), 213–232. doi:10.1080/13563460120060616
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2001b). State theory, regulation and autopoiesis: Debates and controversies. Capital & Class Autumn 2001, 25(3), 83–92. doi:10.1177/030981680107500107
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2006). Spatial fixes, temporal fixes, and spatio-temporal fixes. In N. Castree, & D. Gregory (Eds.), David Harvey: A critical reader (pp. 142–166). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. (2012). Region and place: Regionalism in question. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 263–272. doi:10.1177/0309132510394118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kákai, L. (2004). Önkormányzunk értetek, de nélkületek. Budapest: Századvég.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1997). The invention of regions political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(4), 383–398. doi:10.1068/c150383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2013). Rescaling the European State, The making of territory and the rise of the meso. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. (2006). Systems in context. On the outcome of the habermas/luhmann debate. Ancilla Iuris, 2006, 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, I. (2001). Regional development and governance in Hungary. Discussion papers of the Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Number 35. Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from www.rkk.hu
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, I. (2009). Regionalization in Hungary: Options and scenarios on the ‘road to Europe’. In J. W. Scott (Ed.), De-coding new regionalism. Shifting socio-political contexts in central Europe and Latin America (pp. 199–214). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, I., Paraskevopoulos, C., & Horváth, G. (2004). Institutional ‘legacies’ and the shaping of regional governance in Hungary. Regional and Federal Studies, 14(3), 430–460. doi:10.1080/1359756042000261388
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, K., Sik, E., & Cartwright, A. (2007). Social network analysis or regional policy in South Transdanubia. Policy research report. Budapest: Hungary Centre for Policy Studies of Central European University.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2009). Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution, The 2009 Roepke lecture in economic geography. Papers in evolutionary economic geography, No. 09.10. Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht. Retrieved May 12, 2016, from http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg.html
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (2004). Can social systems be autopoietic? Bhaskar’s and Giddens’ social theories. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(4), 403–427. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (2011). The contribution of systemic thought to critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 10(3), 303–330. doi:10.1558/jcr.v10i3.303
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370. doi:10.1177/1354066106067346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, E. (2001). Winners and losers in the transformation of city centre retailing in East Central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(4), 340–348. doi:10.1177/096977640100800406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, E., & Nagy, G. (2013, August 29–31). The layers of dependence and the changing role of the state – Conceptualising urban change in the East of Europe. ISA research committee on urban and regional development, Berlin. Retrieved October 15, 2014, from http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Papers-3/03_2_enagy_gnagy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, E., Nagy, G., & Timár, J. (2012). The changing meaning of core–periphery relations in a non-metropolitan ‘urban region’ at the Hungarian–Romanian border. DisP the Planning Review, 48(2), 93–105. doi:10.1080/02513625.2012.721613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nárai, M. (2009). Gondolatok a regionális identitásról – identitáselemek a nyugat-dunantúli régióban. Tér és Tarsadalom, 23(4), 137–159.
   Google Scholar
• National Research, Development and Innovation Office. (2014). National smart specialisation strategy. Budapest: Prime Minister’s Office, Ministry of National Economy, Ministry of National Development, Ministry of Human Capacities. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://nkfih.gov.hu/policy-and-strategy/national-strategies/s3/national-smart-specialisation
   Google Scholar
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2001). Territorial reviews: Hungary. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (1991). Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of human life. Environment and Planning A, 23(2), 239–256. doi:10.1068/a230239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2009). The resurgence of the ‘region’ and ‘regional identity’: Theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies, 35, 121–146. doi:10.1017/S0260210509008456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2013). Regional planning and the mobilization of ‘regional identity’: From bounded spaces to relational complexity. Regional Studies, 47(8), 1206–1219. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.661410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palkó, K. (2011). Az identitás területi dimenzió a politikai tükrében (The spatial dimension of identity from a political perspective) (PhD thesis). Department of Economics, University of Pécs, Pécs.
   Google Scholar
• Pálmai, Z. (2013). 2007–2013 Hungarian multilevel governance. With or without regions? In I. Pálné Kovács, J. W. Scott, & Z. Gál (Eds.), Territorial cohesion in Europe (pp. 455–466). Budapest: Institute for Regional Studies Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593–617. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, P. (2004). Regional development implications of foreign direct investment in central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(1), 47–70. doi:10.1177/0969776404039142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2013). Explaining (with) neoliberalism. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(2), 132–115. doi:10.1080/21622671.2013.785365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perger, É. (2009). Az EU kohéziós támogatások felhasználásának intézményrendszere és a forrásfelhasználás hatékonysága, eredményessége (The institutional system of Cohesion Policy implementation and the effectiveness and results of its use of resources). Budapest: ECOSTAT — Kormányzati Gazdaság- és Társadalom-stratégiai Kutató Intézet, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Perger, É. (2010). Az EU Kohéziós politika kormányzati irányitásának magyar sajatosságai (Characteristics of the management system for EU Cohesion Policy in Hungary). Tér és Társadalom, 24(1), 119–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeil, E. (2010). Hungarian public service reform. In P. Swianiewicz (Ed.), Territorial consolidation reforms in Europe (pp. 255–264). Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. (2010). The spirit of post-socialism: Common spaces and the production of diversity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(2), 127–140. doi:10.1177/0969776409356492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisciotta, B. (2016). The center-periphery cleavage revisited: East and Central Europe from Postcommunism to Euroscepticism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 22(2): 193–219. doi:10.1080/13537113.2016.1169063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polányi, K. (1944/1968). The economy as instituted process. In H. LeClair & H. Schneider (Eds.), Economic anthropology. Readings in theory and analysis (pp. 127–138). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. (2006). Counties or regions? Some remarks to the question of regional development in Hungary and Poland. Pécsi Politikai Tanulmányok, III, 253–265.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2013). Territorial cohesion, cross-border cooperation and the EU’s political identity. A brief observation. In I. Pálné Kovács, J. W. Scott, & Z. Gál (Eds.), Territorial cohesion in Europe (pp. 73–84). Budapest: Institute for Regional Studies Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., & Szalai, B. (2014). Central Hungarian region and Budapest agglomeration case study report. GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Paper No. 8.03.02. Retrieved August 15, 2015, from www.grincoh.eu
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Rochovská, A. (2007). Domesticating neo-liberalism: Everyday lives and the geographies of post-socialist transformations. Geoforum, 38(6), 1163–1178. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Timár, J. (2010). Uneven transformations: Space, economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(2), 115–125. doi:10.1177/0969776409358245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Transdanubian Regional Development Agency. (2004). The regional innovation strategy of South Transdanubia. Pécs: South Transdanubian Regional Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2014). The rise of territorial governance in European policy. European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1368–1383. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.786684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenning, A., Smith, A., Rochovská, A., & Świątek, D. (Eds.). (2010). Domesticating neo-liberalism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Storm, E. (2003). Regionalism in history, 1890–1945: The cultural approach. European History Quarterly, 33(2), 251–265. doi:10.1177/02656914030332005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalavetz, A. (2014). Innovation in Hungary: The impact of EU accession and integration into global value chains. International Journal of Management and Economics (Zeszyty Naukowe KGŚ), 42, 40–59. doi:10.2478/ijme-2014-0042
   Google Scholar
• Szörényiné Kukorelli, I. (1998). A Nyugat-Dunántúl Régió –régio? [Is the West Transdanubian region a region?]. Tér és Tarsadalom, 12(3), 51–75.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Allmendinger, J. M. P. (2006). The contested strategies of local governance: Community strategies, development plans, and local government modernisation. Environment and Planning A, 38(3), 533–551. doi:10.1068/a37308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varró, K. (2008). Changing narratives on EU multi-level space in a globalizing era: Wow Hungary as a national space became part of the story. European Planning Studies, 16(7), 955–969. doi:10.1080/09654310802163751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar