Entrepreneurial firms in STI and DUI mode clusters: do they need differentiated cluster facilitation?

References

• Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. (2004). Architecture of knowledge. Firms, capabilities, and communities (2004). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Cooke, P., & Martin, R. (2006). The rise of the cluster concept in regional analysis and policy: A critical assessment. In B. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.), Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations (pp. 1–29). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aslesen, H. W., & Freel, M. (2012). Industrial knowledge bases as drivers of open innovation? Industry and Innovation, 19(7), 563–584. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.726807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslesen, H. W., & Sardo, S. (2016). Dynamic knowledge linkages and extended innovation. AAN annual Meeting 2016. San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924. doi:10.2307/1556419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnstad, S. (2009). Shipshaped. Kongsberg industry and innovations in deepwater technology, 1975–2007 (PhD dissertation, submitted). BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735–747. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00144-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., Li, P. C., & Evans, K. R. (2012). Effects of interaction and entrepreneurial orientation on organizational performance: Insights into market driven and market driving. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 1019–1034. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Asheim, B. T. (2004). Nodes, networks and proximities: On the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon valley biotech cluster. European Planning Studies, 12(7), 1003–1018. doi:10.1080/0965431042000267876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletti, M. (2010). Technology and industrial clusters: How different are they to manage? Science & Public Policy (SPP), 37(9), 679–688. doi: 10.3152/030234210X12778118264413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: regional perspectives and global competitiveness. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Crevoisier, O., & Jeannerat, H. (2009). Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1223–1241. doi:10.1080/09654310902978231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebersberger, B., Herstad, S., & Koller, C. (2014). Does the composition of regional knowledge bases influence extra-regional collaboration for innovation? Applied Economics Letters, 21(3), 201–204. doi:10.1080/13504851.2013.848019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist C. (2001). Innovation policy – a systematic approach. In D. Archibugi, & B. Å. Lundvall (Ed.), The globalizing learning economy (pp. 219–238). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giest, S. (2015). Network capacity-building in high-tech sectors: Opening the black box of cluster facilitation policy. Public Administration, 93(2), 471–489. doi:10.1111/padm.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The embedded firm. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher G., & Ibert, O. (2014). Distance as asset? Knowledge collaboration in hybrid virtual communities. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 97–123. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbt014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2014). Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2305–2325. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.835793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672–1684. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.873120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). Urban agglomerations, knowledge intensive services and innovation activity: Establishing the core connections. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(3/4), 211–233. doi:10.1080/08985626.2014.888098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S. J., Aslesen, H. W., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Research Policy, 43(3), 495–504. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W.S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 275–286. doi:10.1002/smj.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingstrup, M. B., & Damgaard, T. (2013). Cluster facilitation from a cluster life cycle perspective. European Planning Studies, 21(4), 556–574. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INTSOK, Norwegian Oil and Gas Partners, Annual Report 2012
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2011). Organisational learning, supportive innovation systems and implications for policy formulation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(4), 453–462. doi:10.1007/s13132-011-0063-6
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Karlsen J. (2013). Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20, 243–257. doi:10.1177/0969776412439200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Nilsson, M. (2013). Combined innovation policy: Linking scientific and practical knowledge in innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 21(12), 1919–1936. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194. doi:10.2307/3069433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, 14, 640.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–306). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: The case of Brescia mechanical cluster. Research Policy, 30(9), 1479–1500. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00163-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Chaminade, C., & Asheim, B. (2013). The geography and structure of global innovation networks: A knowledge base perspective. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1456–1473. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.755842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manniche, J. (2012). Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: On the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge bases model. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1823–1841. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manniche, J., Moodysson, J., & Testa, S. (2014). Combinatorial knowledge bases: Integrating cognitive, organizational and spatial dimensions in innovation studies and economic geography (No. 2014/28). CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. 0969776411427326. doi:10.1177/0969776411427326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., Bathelt, H., & Malmberg, A. (2006). Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 997–1013. doi:10.1080/09654310600852332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, J. (2012). Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1085–1099. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.552493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A method sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Morales, F. X. (2005). The territorial agglomerations of firms: A social capital perspective from the Spanish tile industry. Growth and Change, 36(1), 74–99. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2005.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J. (2008). Principles and practices of knowledge creation: On the organisation of “buzz” and “pipelines” in life science communities. Economic Geography, 84(4), 449–469. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.00004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Coenen, L., & Asheim, B. (2008). Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster. Environment and Planning A, 40(5), 1040–1056. doi:10.1068/a39110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., Jakobsen, S.-T., Aslesen, H. W., & Fløysand, A. (2016). Encounters between cluster theory, policy and practice in Norway: Hubbing, blending and conceptual stretching. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–16. doi:10.1177/0969776416655860.
   Google Scholar
• Noke, H., Perrons, R. K., & Hughes, M. (2008). Strategic dalliances as an enabler for discontinuous innovation in slow clockspeed industries: Evidence from the oil and gas industry. R&D Management, 38, 129–139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technological change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433–452. doi:10.1093/icc/7.3.433
   Google Scholar
• Pettersen, I. B., Njærheim, K. S., Yemlahi, A. C., & Tobiassen, A. E. (2012). Norwegian subsea firms are going international. Experiences with the market entry process in Houston. SNF-Report 13/12. Bergen, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Pettersen, I. B., & Tobiassen, A. E. (2014, 19–21 May). Exploring the relationship between global industry, psychic distance and market learning: A study of Norwegian high-tech firms’ market entry in Houston. Paper for Atlas/AFMI, Aix-Marseille.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., Packalen, K. A., & Whittington, K. (2012). Organizational and institutional genesis: The emergence of high-tech clusters in the life sciences. In J. Padgett, & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The emergence of organizations and markets (pp. 434–465). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1843–1866. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1741–1758. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Trippl, M. (2006). Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 1035–1058. doi:10.1080/09654310600852365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Lengauer, L., & Höglinger, C. (2011). Knowledge sourcing and innovation in “thick” and “thin” regional innovation systems – comparing ICT Firms in two Austrian regions. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1245–1276. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.573135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2016). How do firms acquire knowledge in different sectoral and regional contexts? In R. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of innovation (pp. 142–154). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Torre A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42, 869–889. doi:10.1080/00343400801922814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Tödtling, F., & Lengauer, L. (2009). Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna software sector. Economic Geography, 85(4), 443–462. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2012). The effects of cluster policy on innovation. A report in the compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention project, led by the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research. Manchester Business School, University of Manchester. Retrieved from http://research.mbs.ac.uk/innovation/March 2012
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods (4th ed.). Applied social research methods series, Vol. 5. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zagorsek, H., Svetina, A. C., & Jaklič, M. (2008). Leadership in clusters: Attributes of effective cluster leader in Slovenia. Transformation in Business & Economics, 7(2), 98–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 917–955. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar