The co-creation (of) culture? The case of Umeå, European Capital of Culture 2014

References

• Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Baeker, G. (2002). Sharpening the lens: Recent research on cultural policy, cultural diversity, and social cohesion. Canadian Journal of Communication, 27(2-3), 179–196. doi: 10.22230/cjc.2002v27n2a1293
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. (2002). Art as a means towards alleviating social exclusion: Does it really work? – a critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1080/102866302900324658
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burström, E. (2013, February 8). Upproriskt i DIY-kulturen [Insubordination in the do-it-yourself culture]. Västerbottens Kuriren.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N. (2012). The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate? Revista Fronteiras – estudos midiáticos, 14(2), 164–177. doi: 10.4013/fem.2012.142.10
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N., & Dahlgren, P. (2011). Introduction: Interrogating audiences – Theoretical horizons of participation. CM, Communication Management Quarterly, 21, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N., & Jenkins, H. (2013). Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 265–286. doi: 10.1177/1354856513486529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2004). Culture at the heart of regeneration. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport/ Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dietachmair, P. (2007). Introduction. In J. Pascual i Ruiz & S. Dragojević (Eds.), Guide to citizen participation in local cultural policy development for European cities (pp. 5–9). Amsterdam: European Cultural Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dinardi, C. (2015). Unsettling the role of culture as panacea: The politics of culture-led urban regeneration in Buenos Aires. City, Culture and Society, 6(25), 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2015.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2010). (Re)producing a periphery: Popular representations of the Swedish North. Kulturgeografiska Institutionen, Umeå: Umeå Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Cities of tomorrow – challenges, visions, ways forward, Directorate General for Regional Policy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). European capitals of culture 2020-2033 guide for cities preparing to bid. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/creative-europe/actions/documents/ecoc-candidates-guide_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2015). Ex-post evaluation of the European capitals of culture (Final Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/creative-europe/actions/documents/ecoc-2014-report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2009). Planning and the just city. In P. Marcuse, J. Connolly, J. Novy, I. Olivo, & C. Potter (Eds.), Searching for the just city: Debates in urban theory and practice (pp. 19–39). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interuptus, critical reflections of the ‘postsocialist’ condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, B. & Cox, T. (2013). European capitals of culture: Success strategies and long-term effects. Brussels: The European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R. (2006). City/culture discourses: Evidence from the competition to select the European capital of culture 2008. European Planning Studies, 14(4), 415–430. doi: 10.1080/09654310500421048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2000). Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies, 37(4), 639–649. doi: 10.1080/00420980050003946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdgaard, N., & Klastrup, L. (2014). Between control and creativity: Challenging co-creation and social media use in a museum context. Digital Creativity, 25(3), 190–202. doi: 10.1080/14626268.2014.904364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, B. (1992). Eating the other. In B. Hooks (Ed.), Black looks: Race and representation (pp. 21–39). Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ind, N., & Coates, N. (2013). The meanings of co-creation. European Business Review, 25(1), 86–95. doi: 10.1108/09555341311287754
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2014). Rethinking ‘rethinking convergence/culture’. Cultural Studies, 28(2), 267–297. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2013.801579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefsson, E. (2014, December 23). Stort intresse för Umeås medskapande [Considerable interest in Umeå’s co-creation]. Göteborgs Posten. Retrieved from http://www.gp.se/kulturnoje/1.2583358-stort-intresse-for-umeas-medskapande#sthash.QjC7Pozf.dpuf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminer, T., & Krivy, M. (Eds.). (2013). The participatory turn in urbanism. Footprint, 7(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Laaksonen, A. (2010). Making culture accessible: Access, participation in cultural life and cultural provision in the context of cultural rights in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meidell, S. (2014, December 12). Towards the new life beyond the logo. Västerbottenskuriren.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, A. (2016). Telling tales of participation: Exploring the interplay of time and territory in cultural boundary work using participation narratives. Cultural Trends, 25(3), 182–193. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2016.1204046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, A., & Sullivan, A. (2012). Understanding participation in culture and sport: Mixing methods, reordering knowledges. Cultural Trends, 21(4), 311–324. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2012.726795
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual i Ruiz, J. (2007). On citizen participation in local cultural policy development for European cities. In J. Pascual i Ruiz & S. Dragojević (Eds.), Guide to citizen participation in local cultural policy development for European cities (pp. 11–39). Amsterdam: European Cultural Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnblom, M., & Sandberg, L. (2015). Den nödvändiga jämställdheten. Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, 36(1–2), 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• SALAR. (2009). Culture in the sustainable society. Stockholm: SALAR.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II Mongrel cities of the 21st century. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Schmauch, U., & Giritli Nygren, K. (2014). The hidden boundaries of everyday places: Migrant women, homeplace and the spatial practices of a small Swedish town. ACME, 13(2), 372–393.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Swanström, E. (2014, April 10). Growth is the aim, culture is the means. Västerbottenskuriren.
   Google Scholar
• Umeå Municipality. (2008). Curiosity and passion – the art of co-creation. A bid from Umeå to become the EU’s Northernmost European Capital of Culture ever. Umeå: Umeå Kommun.
   Google Scholar
• Umeå Municipality. (2009). Curiosity and passion – the art of co-creation. Part 2, clarifying and deepening Umeå’s bid to become the European Union’s Northernmost European Capital of Culture Ever. Umeå: Umeå Kommun.
   Google Scholar
• Umeå Municipality. (2014a). Umeå - Open and tolerant. Retrieved from http://umea2014.se/en/visit-umea/.
   Google Scholar
• Umeå Municipality. (2014b). Growth through culture. Retrieved from http://umea2014.se/en/about-umea2014/growth-through-culture/.
   Google Scholar
• Umeå Municipality. (2014c). The grand finale. Retrieved from http://umea2014.se/sv/om-umea2014/press/?nd_ukey=a26f44fd3227ee18598ba0833a3cd5e1&nd_view=view_pressrelease&nd_nr_of_items=8&nd_id=1098742.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2013, May). Culture: A driver and enabler of social cohesion. Background note. Culture: Key to sustainable development, Hangzhou International Congress, China.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, B. (2013). Co-creating theatre: Authentic engagement or inter-legitimation? Cultural Trends, 22(2), 108–118. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2013.783176
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and the politics of difference (new in paper). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davies, N. (2012). Dialogical epistemology – an intersectional resistance to the ‘Oppression Olympics’. Gender and Society, 26(1), 46–54. doi: 10.1177/0891243211427701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar