Re-categorizing innovation policy according to broad-based innovation

References

• Adler, P., & Kwon, S.-W. (2000). Social capital: The good, the bad and the ugly. In E. L. Lesser (Ed.), Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications (pp. 89–115). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 163–173. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2003). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In J. V. Henderson & J. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of urban and regional economics: Cities and geography (Vol. 4, pp. 2713–2739). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Aula, P., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2008). Innovative Milieu – a view on regional reputation building: A case study of the Lahti Urban region. Regional Studies, 42(4), 523–538. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthoin Antal, A. (2013). Art-based research for engaging not-knowing in organizations. Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 4(1), 67–76. doi: 10.1386/jaah.4.1.67_1
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005a). Role of proximity in interaction and performance: Conceptual and empirical challenges. Regional Studies, 39(1), 41–45. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005b). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E. (2010, April 1). The four ways IT is revolutionizing innovation, an interview with Erik Brynjolfsson. MIT Sloan Management Review. Retrieved December 29, 2010, from http://sloanreview.mit.edu/the-magazine/articles/2010/spring/51330/it-innovation-brynjolfsson-article/
   Google Scholar
• de Castro, E., & Jensen-Butler, C. (1993). Flexibility, routine behaviour and the neoclassical model in the analysis of regional growth. Institute of Political Science, University of Aarhus.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2007). To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms. European Planning Studies, 15(2), 179–194. doi: 10.1080/09654310601078671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2015). The virtues of variety in regional innovation systems and entrepreneunial ecosystems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1(1), 21. doi: 10.1186/s40852-015-0002-z
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2008). A theory of organizing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenge. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Norfolk: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., Luukkonen, T., & Sotarauta, M. (2009). Broad-based innovation policy, in evaluation of the Finnish national innovation system – full report, Taloustieto Oy, Helsinki, pp. 11–69. Retrieved November 5, 2009, from www.evaluation.fi
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. (2006). Putting knowledge into practice: A broad-based innovation strategy for the EU. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0502:FIN:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. G., Verburg, T., & Boschma, R. (2004). Variety and regional economic growth in the Netherlands. Final report to the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwarzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V. (2006). Regional development platform method (RDPM) as a tool for regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 1085–1104. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., & Melkas, H. (2005). Knowledge management in regional innovation networks: The case of Lahti, Finland. European Planning Studies, 13(5), 641–659. doi: 10.1080/09654310500139277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., & Melkas, H. (Eds.). (2008). Innovaatiopolitiikkaa järjestelmien välimaastossa. Kuntaliitto: ACTA-sarja.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., & Mutanen, A. (2008). Knowledge production in networked practice-based innovation processes – interrogative model as a methodological approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 3, 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., Tura, T., & Melkas, H. (2011). Regional innovation platforms. In P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), The handbook of regional innovation & growth (pp. 556–572). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V., & Uotila, T. (2006). Building regional visionary capability. Futures research in resource based regional development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 778–792. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, H. (2002). Draaman maailmat oppimisalueina: Draamakasvatuksen vakava leikillisyys. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, V. (2004). Itseoppineen paluu (Return of the self-educated, free translation). In H. Kotila, & A. Mutanen (Eds.), Tutkiva ja kehittävä ammattikorkeakoulu (Polytechnics doing research and development, free translation) (pp. 279–295). Helsinki: Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Hennala, L., Melkas, H., & Pekkarinen S. (2011). Customers as innovators in senior service markets: An examination of innovation potential and characteristics. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 2(1), 30–51. doi: 10.4018/jssmet.2011010103
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, L., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37, 740–760. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himanka, J. (2007). Oppimisen paremmuusjärjestys? Aristoteles, taito ja tieto. In H. Kotila, A. Mutanen, M. V. (toim) Volanen (Eds.), Taidon tieto, s (pp. 141–148). Helsinki: Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J. (1982). Kieli ja mieli: Katsauksia kielifilosofiaan ja merkityksen teoriaan. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J. (1988). What is the logic of experimental inquiry? Synthese, 74, 173–190. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/BF00869551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39(5–6), 871–884. doi: 10.1080/00420980220128354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L., & Halkier, H. (2016). Regional development platforms and related variety: Exploring the changing practices of food tourism in Nirth Jutland, Denmark. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), 831–847. doi: 10.1177/0969776414557293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B-Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge, modes of innovation and innovation systems. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, A., Harmaakorpi, V., & Pihkala, T. (2010). Absorptive capacity and social capital in regional innovation systems: The case of Lahti region in Finland. Urban Studies, 47(2), 303–319. doi: 10.1177/0042098009346373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könnölä, T., Brummer, V., & Salo, A. (2007). Diversity in foresight: Insights from the fostering of innovation ideas. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 608–626. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., Boekholt, P., Georghiou, L., Guy, K., Héraud, J-A., Laredo, P., Lemola, T., Loveridge, D., Luukkonen, T., Polt, W., Rip, A., Sanz-Menendez, L., & Smits, R. (1999). Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems. Final Report of the Advanced Science & Technology Policy Planning Network (ASTPP). Thematic Network of the European Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme (TSER). Contract No. SOE1-CT96-1013. Karlsruhe November 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., & Cinti, T. (2010, January). The regional development platform and ‘related variety’: Some evidence from art and food in Tuscany. European Planning Studies, 18(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1080/09654310903343518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, R. K., & Piore, M. J. (2004). Innovation: The missing dimension. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linna, P., Melkas, H., & Hennala, L. (2010). Designing and implementing regional innovation policy in the public sector: Tools for triggering organisational process. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 2(4), 281–303. doi: 10.1504/IJIRD.2010.036988
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E., & B.-Å. Lundvall (Eds.). (2006). How Europe’s economies learn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Innovation system research: Where it came from and where it might go. Globelics Working Paper Series No. 2007-01. The Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building System. Retrieved December 29, 2010, from http://dcsh.xoc.uam.mx/eii/globelicswp/wpg0701.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250130505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34, 429–449. doi: 10.1068/a3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkas, H. (2014). Information and knowledge base of innovation policy-making: An analysis of documents on innovation information and knowledge. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 10(2), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Melkas, H., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2008). Data, information and knowledge in regional innovation networks: Quality considerations and brokerage functions. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(1), 103–124. doi: 10.1108/14601060810845240
   Google Scholar
• Melkas, H., & Harmaakorpi, V. (Eds.), (2012). Practice-based innovation. Insights, applications and policy implications. Berlin: Axel Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Melkas, H., Uotila, T., & Tura, T. (2016). Policies of related variety in practice: The case innovation session method. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 489–510. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1088515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51, 31–75. doi: 10.1177/0003603X0605100103
   Google Scholar
• Nahabiet, J. (2009). Capitalizing connections: Social capital and strategic management. In V. Bartcus & J. Davis (Eds.), Social capital: Reaching out, reaching in (pp. 205–236). London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Panne, G., van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 309–338. doi: 10.1142/S1363919603000830
   Google Scholar
• Parjanen, S., Harmaakorpi, V., & Frantsi, T. (2010). Collective creativity and brokerage functions in heavily cross-disciplined innovation processes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Parjanen, S., Melkas, H., & Uotila, T. (2011). Distances, knowledge brokerage and absorptive capacity in enhancing regional innovativeness: A qualitative case study of Lahti region, Finland. European Planning Studies, 19(6), 921–948. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.568804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pässilä, A., Oikarinen, T., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2015). Collective voicing as a reflexive practice. Management Learning, 46(1), 67–86. doi: 10.1177/1350507613488310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen, S., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2006, June). Building regional innovation networks: Definition of age business core process in a regional innovation system. Regional Studies, 40(4), 401–413. doi: 10.1080/00343400600725228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen, S., Hennala, L., Harmaakorpi, V., & Tura, T. (2011). Clashes as potential for innovation in public service sector reform. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(6), 507–532. doi: 10.1108/09513551111163639
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pihkala, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Pekkarinen, S. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and social capital in breaking socio-institutional inertia in regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 836–852. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00757.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990, November–December). Cluster and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. doi: 10.1353/jod.1995.0002
   Google Scholar
• Rickne, A. (2000). New technology-based firms and industrial dynamics: Evidence from the technological system of biomaterials in Sweden, Ohio and Massachusetts. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ronde, P., & Hussler, C. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does really matter? Research Policy, 34(8), 1150–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharmer, C. O. (2001). Self-transcending knowledge: Organizing around emerging realities. In I. Nonaka & D. Teece (Eds.), Managing industrial knowledge: Creation, transfer and utilization (pp. 68–90). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, H. (2015). Shift: A leader's guide to the platform economy. Boise, ID: Tru Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhle, P., Sotarauta, M., Pöyhönen, A. (2004). Innovatiivisten ympäristöjen ja organisaatioiden johtaminen (free translation: Management of innovative environments and organizations). Tulevaisuusvaliokunta teknologian arviointeja 19. Eduskunnan kanslian julkaisu 6/2004.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Gilly, J. P. (2000). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies, 34(2), 169–180. doi: 10.1080/00343400050006087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tura, T., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2005). Social capital in building regional innovative capability. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1111–1125. doi: 10.1080/00343400500328255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tura, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Pekkola, S. (2008). Breaking inside the black box: Towards a dynamic evaluation framework of regional innovative capability. Science and Public Policy, 35(10), 701–788. doi: 10.3152/030234208X363169
   Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., & Ahlquist, T. (2008). Linking technology foresight and regional innovation activities: Network-facilitating innovation policy in Lahti Region, Finland. European Planning Studies, 16(1), 1423–1443. doi: 10.1080/09654310802420144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Hermans, R. (2012). Finnish mosaic of regional innovation system – assessment of thematic regional innovation platforms based on related variety. European Planning Studies, 20(10), 1583–1602. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Melkas, H. (2006). A method for assessing absorptive capacity of a regional innovation system. Fennia, 184(1), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., & Melkas, H. (2007). Quality of data, information and knowledge in technology foresight processes. Futures, 39, 1117–1130. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2007.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., & Melkas, H. (2008). Complex knowledge conversion processes and information quality in regional innovation networks. Knowledge and Process Management, 15(4), 224–234 doi: 10.1002/kpm.317
   Google Scholar
• Uotila, T., Melkas, H., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2005). Incorporating futures research into regional knowledge creation and management. Futures, 37, 849–866. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volanen, M. V. (2006). Filoteknia ja kysymys sivistävästä työstä. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar