Governing system innovation: assisted living experiments in the UK and Norway

References

• Benner, M. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart experimentation. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 58(1), 33–49. doi: 10.1515/zfw.2014.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Broto, V. C., & Edwards, G. (2012). Bringing climate change to the city: Towards low carbon urbanism? Local Environment, 17, 545–551. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.681464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Raven, R., & Verbong, G. (2010). Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: A theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages. Technology in Society, 32, 295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, A. M., McGee-Lennon, M., O’Donnell, C. A., Bouamrane, M.-M., Agbakoba, R., O’Connor, S., … Mair, F. (2016). Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: Lessons learned during the implementation of the DALLAS program in the United Kingdom. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1), 48–59. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DHACA. (2016). Digital health and care alliance. Retrieved from http://dhaca.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? (Working Paper 314). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 521–536. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 603–633. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HelseOmsorg21. (2014). Et kunnskapssystem for bedre folkehelse. Nasjonal forsknings- og innovasjonsstrategi for helse og omsorg. Research Council of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, B., Pierre, J., & Sundström, G. (2015). Governing the embedded state: The organizational dimension of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 175–198. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy, 37, 823–835. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, A. (2014). Long-term care in the UK. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. (2015, November). Twenty challenges for innovation studies (SPRU Working Paper Series SWPS 2015-30). SPRU Science Policy Research Unit/University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016). Speaking truth to power: The political dynamics of public sector innovation. In D. Kyriakou, M. Palazuelos Martínez, I. Periáñez-Forte, & A. Rainoldi (Eds.), Governing smart specialisation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). System innovation: Synthesis report. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the policy process. Theoretical lenses on public policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 169–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 537–554. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., & Raven, R. (2014). Metering motorbike mobility: Informal transport in transition? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(4), 453–468. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.870991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39, 763–770. doi: 10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41, 1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39, 435–448. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, F. (2012). Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: Sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24, 331–343. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, A., Kellaher, L., Ginn, J., & Ribe, E. (2013). Assisted living platform – The long term care revolution. TSB, Swindon.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. A. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25, 609–619. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar