Impact of planning mandates on local plans: a multi-method assessment

References

• Abis, E., & Garau, C. (2016). An assessment of the effectiveness of strategic spatial planning: A study of Sardinian municipalities. European Planning Studies, 24(1), 139–162. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1031091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, J., & Rizzo, M. (2012). R by example. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2011). Evaluating planning. What is successful planning and (how) can we measure it? In A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee, & J. Woltjer (Eds.), Evaluation for participation and sustainability in planning (pp. 32–46). Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, W. C. (1997). General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3), 329–344. doi: 10.1080/01944369708975926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P., Cooper, J., Aminto, M., Grabich, S., & Horney, J. (2014). Adaptive planning for disaster recovery and resiliency: An evaluation of 87 local recovery plans in eight states. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(4), 310–323. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2014.976585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., & Conroy, M. M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1080/01944360008976081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., & French, S. P. (1994). The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13(4), 237–250. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9401300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R., & Kaiser, E. J. (2006). Urban land use planning (5th ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., Roenigk, D. J., Kaiser, E. J., & Burby, R. (1996). Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39(1), 79–96. doi: 10.1080/09640569612688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., Carrasco, V., & Highfield, W. E. (2006). Measuring the adoption of local sprawl: Reduction planning policies in Florida. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(3), 294–310. doi: 10.1177/0739456X05280546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung (ARE). (2009). Konzept zur Siedlungsentwicklung nach innen, Arbeitshilfe zur Erarbeitung der Agglomerationsprogramme Verkehr und Siedlung [ Concept for compact urban development, tools for the development of the transportation and urban area agglomeration programmes]. Bern: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS). (2014). Regionale Porträts 2014: Gemeinden [Regional portraits: Municipalities 2014] [Statistics]. Neuchâtel: Author. Retrieved November 9, 2015, from https://www.media-stat.admin.ch/maps/profile/data/237/fr/pdf/Portraits-regionaux-2014-communes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, G., & Jepson Jr, E. J. (2011). The effect of mandated planning on plan quality: A fresh look at what makes ‘a good plan’. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(4), 338–353. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2011.619951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J., Berke, P., Dalton, L. C., DeGrove, J. M., French, S. P., Kaiser, E. J., … Roenigk, D. (1993). Is state-mandated planning effective? Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 45(10), 3–9. doi: 10.1080/00947598.1993.10395815
   Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J., & May, P. J. (1997). Making governemnts plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Universtity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, D. B., Fan, Y.-A., & Joe, H. (1993). A remark on algorithm 643: FEXACT: An algorithm for performing fisher's exact test in r x c contingency tables. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 19(4), 484–488. doi: 10.1145/168173.168412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. M., & Berke, P. R. (2004). What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development. Environment and Planning A, 36(8), 1381–1396. doi: 10.1068/a367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, L. C., & Burby, R. J. (1994). Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(4), 444–461. doi: 10.1080/01944369408975604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Montis, A. (2016). Measuring the performance of planning: The conformance of Italian landscape planning practices with the European Landscape Convention. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1727–1745. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1178215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. M., & Haines, A. (2007). Evaluating smart growth: Implications for small communities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(1), 49–64. doi: 10.1177/0739456X07305792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elinbaum, P., & Galland, D. (2016). Analysing contemporary metropolitan spatial plans in Europe through their institutional context, instrumental content and planning process. European Planning Studies, 24(1), 181–206. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1036843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), 299–318. doi: 10.1080/713691907
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-D. (2016). The managerial turn and municipal land-use planning in Switzerland – evidence from practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 192–209. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1161063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilgen, K. W. (Ed.). (2012). Kommunale Raumplanung in der Schweiz (3rd ed.). Zürich: VdF Hochschulverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire, T. G., & Valentine, H. T. (2008). Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D., & Seasons, M. (2016). Plan evaluation: Challenges and directions for future research. Planning Practice & Research, 31(2), 215–228. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. (2007). How plan mandates work: Affordable housing in Illinois. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(1), 86–99. doi: 10.1080/01944360708976138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, N., Rudolf, S., Berli, J., Hersperger, A., Kienast, F., & Schulz, T. (2016). Raumplanung in den Schweizer Gemeinden: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage [ Spatial planning in the Swiss municipalities: Results of a survey] (WSL Bericht Nr 42). Birmensdorf: Eidg. Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., Crawford, J., Day, M., Kouwenhoven, P., Mason, G., Ericksen, N., & Beattie, L. (2010). Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 740–757. doi: 10.1068/b35051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Norton, R. K. (2015). Planning consultants’ influence on local comprehensive plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 199–208. doi: 10.1177/0739456X14566868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles, W., Berke, P., & Smith, G. (2014). A comparison of local hazard mitigation plan quality in six states, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles, W., Berke, P., & Smith, G. (2016). Local plan implementation: Assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(2), 381–400. doi: 10.1177/0265813515604071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles, W., & Stevens, M. (2014). Plan quality evaluation 1994–2012: Growth and contributions, limitations, and new directions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(4), 433–450. doi: 10.1177/0739456X14549752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, C. R., & Patel, N. R. (1986). ALGORITHM 643: FEXACT: A FORTRAN subroutine for Fisher’s exact test on unordered r×c contingency tables. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 12(2), 154–161. doi: 10.1145/6497.214326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 189–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, G. P., & Hersperger, A. M. (2015). Implementing comprehensive plans: Indicators for a task-sheet based performance evaluation process. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), 2056–2081. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2014.973482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (1998). Does planning need the plan? Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 208–220. doi: 10.1080/01944369808975976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996). Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems, and planning projects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Normann, R. H., & Vasström, M. (2012). Municipalities as governance network actors in rural communities. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 941–960. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.673565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R. K. (2005a). Local commitment to state-mandated planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 149–171. doi: 10.1177/0739456X05278984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R. K. (2005b). More and better local planning: State-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(1), 55–71. doi: 10.1080/01944360508976405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R. K. (2008). Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes. Land Use Policy, 25(3), 432–454. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2009). Evaluating plans, processes and results. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(1), 35–63. doi: 10.1080/14649350802661741
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2001). Municipal plans, state mandates, and property rights: Lessons from Maine. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(2), 154–165. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0102100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.0.) [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, J. (2004). Environmental land use planning and management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., & Buehler, R. (2007). The planning process in the US and Germany: A comparative analysis. International Planning Studies, 12(1), 55–75. doi: 10.1080/13563470701346592
   Google Scholar
• Schweizerische Vereinigung für Landesplanung (VLP-ASPAN). (2012). Raumplanung in der Schweiz: Eine Kurzeinführung [ Spatial planning in Switzerland: A short introduction]. Retrieved from http://www.vlp-aspan.ch/de/information/raumplanung-der-schweiz
   Google Scholar
• Soria, J. A., & Valenzuela, L. M. (2013). A method for the evaluation of metropolitan planning: Application to the context in Spain. European Planning Studies, 21(6), 944–966. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. R. (2013). Evaluating the quality of official community plans in southern British Columbia. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(4), 471–490. doi: 10.1177/0739456X13505649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. R., Lyles, W., & Berke, P. R. (2014). Measuring and reporting intercoder reliability in plan quality evaluation research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), 77–93. doi: 10.1177/0739456X13513614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(3), 248–259. doi: 10.1177/088541229601000302
   Google Scholar