Vicarious habitation – reinterpreting the role of peripheral living in a Nordic context

References

• Aarsæther, N. (2004). Innovations in the Nordic periphery (Nordregio Rep. 2004, No. 3). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, H. (2015). Place attachment as a driver for adaptation in coastal communities in northern Norway. Local Environment, 20(3), 257–276. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2013.838751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angyal, A. (1965). Neurosis and treatment. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Aure, M., Berg, N. G., Cruikshank, J., & Dale, B. (Eds.). (2015). Med sans for steder. Nyere teorier. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bærenholdt, J. O., & Granås, B. (Eds.). (2008). Mobility and place. Enacting Northern European peripheries. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Baldersheim, H., & Ståhlberg, K. (2002). From guided democracy to multi-level governance: Trends in central-local relations in the Nordic countries. Local Government Studies, 28(3), 74–90. doi: 10.1080/714004149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylina, M., & Berg, N. G. (2010). Selling the countryside: Representations of rurality in Norway and Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(3), 277–292. doi: 10.1177/0969776409356215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2012). Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU’s regional policy. European Economic Review, 56(4), 648–668. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2008). Religious America, secular Europe? A theme and variations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brasier, K. J., Sachs, C. E., Kiernan, N. E., Trauger, A., & Barbercheck, M. E. (2014). Capturing the multiple and shifting identities of farm women in the northeastern United States. Rural Sociology, 79(3), 283–309. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, S., & Voas, D. (2010). Vicarious religion: An examination and critique. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 25(2), 243–259. doi: 10.1080/13537901003750936
   Google Scholar
• Collados, C., & Duane, T. P. (1999). Natural capital and quality of life: A model for evaluating the sustainability of alternative regional development paths. Ecological Economics, 30(2), 441–460. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F., & Lützeler, R. (Eds.). (2011). Imploding populations in Japan and Germany: A comparison. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J. (2006). Protest against centralization in Norway: The evolvement of the goal for maintaining a dispersed settlement pattern. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 60(3), 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J. (2009). A play for rurality – Modernization versus local autonomy. Journal of Rural Studies, 25(1), 98–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J., Lysgård, H.-K., & Magnussen, M.-L. (2009). The logic of construction of rural politics: Political discourses on rurality in Norway. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 91(1), 73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00307.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugstad, K. (2008). Negotiating landscape in rural tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(2), 402–426. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugstad, K., Rønningen, K., & Skaar, B. (2006). Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage? Conceptualizations and value judgements – A Norwegian perspective in international context. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), 67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davie, G. (2007). Vicarious religion: A methodological challenge. In N. T. Ammermann (Ed.), Everyday religion (pp. 21–35). Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Davie, G. (2010). Vicarious religion: A response. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 25(2), 261–266. doi: 10.1080/13537901003750944
   Google Scholar
• Davie, G. (2013[2001]). The persistence of institutional religion in modern Europe. In L. Woodhead, P. Heelas, & D. Martin (Eds.), Peter Berger and the study of religion (pp. 101–111). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eifert, B., Gelb, A., & Tallroth, B. (2002, October). The political economy of fiscal economy and economic management in oil exporting countries (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2899). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, W. (2016). Rural second homes: A narrative of de-centralization. Sociologica Ruralis. doi: 10.1111/soru.12130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, W., & Hidle, K. (2013). Performing homes in mobility: Second homes in Norway. Tourism Geographies, 15(2), 250–267. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2011.647330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2010). (Re)producing a periphery. Popular representations of the Swedish North. Umeå: GERUM Kulturgeografi.
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, H., & Snickars, F. (Eds.). (1995). Competitive European peripheries. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2011). Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1089–1111. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furre, H., Knudsen, J. P., Brastad, B., & Vestergaard, M. (2014). Evaluering av kompetansesenter for distriktsutvikling. Kristiansand: Oxford Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gjertsen, T., & Halseth, G. (Eds.). (2015). Sustainable development in the circumpolar north – from Tana, Norway to Oktemtsy, Russia. Prince George, BC: UNBC Community Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gløersen, E., Dubois, A., Copus, A., & Schürmann, C. (2006). Northern peripheral, sparsely populated regions in the European Union and in Norway (Nordregio Rep. 2006, no. 2). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Gløersen, E. (2012). La Finlande, la Norvge, la Sude face au projet d’une Europe polycentrique. La centralité à la marge de l’Europe. Espace et territoires. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsrud, G. M. (2011). How well does the ‘counter-urbanisation story’ travel to other countries? The case of Norway. Population, Space and Place, 17(5), 642–655. doi: 10.1002/psp.655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. C. (1972). Regional disparities in Norway with reference to marginality. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 57, 15–30. doi: 10.2307/621551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. C. (1983). Regional policy in an oil economy: The case of Norway. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and regional geosciences, 14(4), 353–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. (1989). The British rural community: An overview of perspectives. Journal of Rural Studies, 5(2), 161–184. doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(89)90044-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugen, M. S., & Lysgård, H. K. (2006). Discourses of rurality in a Norwegian context. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 60(3), 174–178.
   Google Scholar
• Hayter, R., Barnes, T. J., & Bradshaw, M. J. (2003). Relocating resource peripheries to the core of economic geography’s theorizing: Rationale and agenda. Area, 35(1), 15–23. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström, M., & Littke, H. (2011). Perspectives on rural development in the Nordic countries (Nordregio Electronic Working Paper No. 2011:3). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Hemstad, R., & Sørensen, Ø. (1998). Jakten på det norske: perspektiver på utviklingen av en norsk nasjonal identitet på 1800-tallet. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Holmer-Hoven, E. (2013, February 15). Ågerøya og taksering. Lillesands-Posten, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, S. (1990). Counter-urbanization revisited: The new map of population distribution in central and north-Western Europe. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 44(1), 39–52. doi: 10.1080/00291959008552243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jennings, B. M., & Krannich, R. S. (2013). A multidimensional exploration of the foundation of community attachment among seasonal and year-round residents. Rural Sociology, 78(4), 498–527. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (Ed.). (2009). Sentraliseringens pris. Er sentralisering et problem? NIBR-rapport 2009(5). Oslo: NIBR.
   Google Scholar
• Jonasson, M. (2016). Horizontally organised and innovative spaces of dialogue for dealing with ‘wicked problems’ related to housing in rural Sweden. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16, 458–472. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2016.1150011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KMD. (2011). Utlysing bolyst 2011. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/kommuner-og-regioner/regional--og-distriktspolitikk/bulyst/bulyst-2011-2/utlysning-bolyst-2011/id731808/
   Google Scholar
• KMD. (2014a). Aktivitetsrapport 2014. Rapporteringsåret 2013 – Programkategori 13.50. Oslo: Ministry of Local Affairs and Modernization.
   Google Scholar
• KMD. (2014b). Orientering om statsbudsjettet for 2015 – programkategori 13.50 Distrikts- og regionalpolitikk – foreløpige rammer. Oslo: Ministry of Local Affairs and Modernization.
   Google Scholar
• KMD. (2015). Statsbudsjettet 2016. Orientering om framlegg til statsbudsjettet for 2016 – programkategori 13.50 Distrikts- og regionalpolitikk – førebels rammer. Oslo: Ministry of Local Affairs and Modernization.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, J. P. (Forthcoming). Towards a new spatial paradigm. Norwegian politics at the cross-roads.
   Google Scholar
• Kotilainen, J., Eisto, I., & Vatanen, E. (2015). Uncovering mechanisms for resilience: Strategies to counter shrinkage in a peripheral city in Finland. European Planning Studies, 23(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.820086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T. (2012). How do cities and regions adapt to socio-economic crisis? Towards an institutionalist approach to urban and regional resilience. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 70(4), 285–291. doi: 10.1007/s13147-012-0170-2
   Google Scholar
• Leick, B. (2015). Wie demographische Schrumpfung Unternehmen herausfordert. Geographische Rundschau, 2015(9), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, D., & Dench, B. (2011). The holistic theory of Andras Angyal: Measuring the system principle. Psychological Reports, 108(1), 213–216. doi: 10.2466/02.07.21.PR0.108.1.213-216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, M. (Ed.). (2010). Regional development in the Nordic countries 2010 (Nordregio Rep. 2010, No. 2). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Longlands, S. L. J. (2013). Growing nowhere: Privileging economic growth in planning policy. Local Economy, 28(7–8), 894–905. doi: 10.1177/0269094213505162
   Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, A. B. (2013). The experience turn of the Danish periphery: The downscaling of new spatial strategies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(4), 460–472. doi: 10.1177/0969776412441192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, C., & Parkins, J. R. (2013). Toward a social theory of resilience: Social systems, cultural systems, and collective action in transitioning forest-based communities. Rural Sociology, 78(4), 528–549. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., & Shrock, G. (2009). Consumption-driven urban development. Urban Geography, 30(4), 344–367. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.30.4.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2005). Rural geography: Multifunctional rural geographies – reactionary or radical? Progress in Human Geography, 29(6), 773–782. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph584pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, C., Wishlade, F., & Yuill, D. (2006). Conditioning and fine-tuning Europeanization: Negotiating regional policy maps under the EU’s competition and cohesion policies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 581–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mønnesland, J. (1997). Regional policy in the Nordic countries: Background and tendencies 1997. Copenhagen: NordREFO.
   Google Scholar
• Myklebost, H. (1984). The evidence for urban turnaround in Norway. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and regional geosciences, 15(2), 167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myklebost, H. (1989). Migration of elderly Norwegians. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 43(4), 191–213. doi: 10.1080/00291958908552236
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Strand, A. (2011). Oslo’s farewell to urban sprawl. European Planning Studies, 19(1), 113–139. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.530395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyseth, T., & Viken, A. (Eds.). (2009). Place reinvention. Northern perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Overvåg, K., & Berg, N. G. (2011). Second homes, rurality and contested space in eastern Norway. Tourism Geographies, 13(3), 417–442. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2011.570778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (1997). Geographical perspectives on Finnish national identity. GeoJournal, 43(1), 41–50. doi: 10.1023/A:1006885503314
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2010). Regions are social constructs, but ‘who’ or ‘what’ constructs them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A, 42(12), 2296–2301. doi: 10.1068/a42232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, C., & Tilzey, M. (2005). Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: Neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 581–600. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph569oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, K., & Johnson, T. G. (2010). Modelling policies for multifunctional agriculture and rural development – a Norwegian case study. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 239–257. doi: 10.1002/eet.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repstad, P. (2008). Christmas concerts – maintaining vicarious religion. In L. Kanckos & R. Kauranen (Eds.), Sosial samhörighet och religion, Festschrift for Susan Sundback (pp. 101–112). Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J. F., & Berg, N. G. (2011). The second home phenomenon and Norwegian rurality. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 65(3), 126–136. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2011.597873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sireni, M. (2015). Reinventing rural femininities in the post-productivist Finnish countryside. European Countryside, 7(1), 42–56. doi: 10.1515/euco-2015-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sømme, A. (Ed.). (1968). A geography of Norden: Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Soubbotina, T. P. (2004). Beyond economic growth. An introduction to sustainable development (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. Census data, 1900, 1946, 1970. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Steinführer, A. (2015). «Landflucht» und «sterbende Städte». Diskurse über räumliche Schrumpfung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Geographische Rundschau, 2015(9), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• St.meld. nr. 21. (2005–2006). Hjarte for heile landet. Om distrikts- og regionalpolitikken. Oslo: Akademika.
   Google Scholar
• St.meld. nr. 25. (2008–2009). Lokal vekstkraft og framtidstru. Om distrikts- og regionalpolitikken. Oslo: Akademika.
   Google Scholar
• Teigen, H. (2012). Distriktspolitikk gjennom 50 år – Strategane og avviklinga. Nytt norsk tidsskrift, 11(2), 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Van Auken, P. M. (2010). Seeing, not participating. Viewscape fetishism in American and Norwegian rural amenity areas. Human Ecology, 38(4), 521–537. doi: 10.1007/s10745-010-9323-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Auken, P. M., & & Rye, J. F. (2011). Amenities, affluence, and ideology: Comparing rural restructuring processes in the US and Norway. Landscape Research, 36(1), 63–84. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2010.536203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vareide, K., Kobro, L., & Storm, H. (2013). Programteori for attraktivitet. Sammendragsrapport. TF-notat nr. 13/2013. Bø: Telemarksforsking.
   Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, P. (1989). The end of drastic depopulation in rural Finland: Evidence of counterurbanisation? Journal of Rural Studies, 5(2), 123–136. doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(89)90041-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, P. A. (2008). Managing without growth: Slower by design. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vinge, H., & Flø, B. E. (2015). Landscapes lost? Tourist understanding of changing Norwegian rural landscapes. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 15(1), 29–47. doi: 10.1080/15022250.2015.1010283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voas, D. (2008). The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 155–168. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weck, S., & Beisswenger, S. (2014). Coping with peripheralization: Governance response in two German small cities. European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2156–2171. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.819839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlund, H. (2002). An unplanned green wave: Settlement patterns in Sweden during the 1990s. Environment and Planning A, 34(8), 1395–1410. doi: 10.1068/a3358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, T., & Bontje, M. (2015). Responding to tough times: Policy and planning strategies in shrinking cities. European Planning Studies, 23(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.820077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witoszek, N. (1998). Norske naturmytologier: fra Edda til økofilosofi. Pax: Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Wæraas, A. (2015). Making a difference: Strategic positioning in municipal reputation building. Local Government Studies, 41(2), 280–300. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2014.930025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar