Planning strategies and practices in non-core regions: a critical response

References

• Ahlqvist, T., & Moisio, S. (2014). Neoliberalisation in a Nordic state: From cartel polity towards a corporate polity in Finland. New Political Economy, 19(1), 21–55. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2013.768608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Smart specialisation: Sources for new path development in a peripheral manufacturing region. (Paper No. 2015/11). Lund: Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE). Retrieved from http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201511_Asheim_Grillitsch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Berkowitz, P., Hardy, S., & Muravska, T. (Eds.). (2017). EU cohesion policy: Reassessing performance and direction. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bontje, M., Musterd, S., & Pelzer, P. (2011). Inventive city-regions: Path dependence and creative knowledge strategies. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bürcher, S., & Mayer, H. (2017). Regional engagement of entrepreneurs in non-core regions. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S., Martin, R., Sunley, P., & Tyler, P. (2014). Reindustrialising regions: Rebuilding the manufacturing economy? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(3), 351–358. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (Ed.). (2013). Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation and transition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dax, T., & Fischer, M. (2017). Overcoming conventional stereotypes in rural regions: New perspectives of social innovation for depopulation in Austria. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Kyriakou, D., Cohen, C., & Przeor, M. (Eds.). (2016). Implementing smart specialisation: A handbook. Brussels: European Commission, EUR 28053 EN. doi: 10.2791/53569
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. (2011). The triumph of the city. London: Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gløersen, E. (2009). Strong, specific and promising: Towards a vision for the Northern sparsely populated areas in 2020. Stockholm: Nordregio. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.se/en/Publications/Publications-2009/Strong-Specific-and-Promising/
   Google Scholar
• Hadjimichalis, C., & Hudson, R. (2014). Contemporary crisis across Europe and the crisis of regional development theories. Regional Studies, 48(1), 208–218. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.834044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2014). Good cities, better lives: How Europe discovered the lost art of urbanism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2010). Making better places: The planning project in the twenty-first century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A. (2016). Smart specialization in a centralized state: Strengthening the regional contribution in North East Romania. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1527–1543. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1184233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 9, 1–22 . doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B., & Bradley, J. (2015). The metropolitan revolution: How cities and metros are fixing our broken politics and fragile economy. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M., & Loughlin, J. (Eds.). (1997). The political economy of regionalism (pp. 17–40). London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, J. P. (2017). Vicarious living: Reinterpreting the role of peripheral living in the Nordic context. European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361589
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, M. (2015). Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 367–378. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.862518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpper, P., Kundolf, S., Mettenberger, T., & Tuitjer, G. (2017). Planning approaches for non-core regions: Trapped between innovativeness and practicability? European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, T. (2012). Shrinkage, metropolization and peripherization in East Germany. European Planning Studies, 20(10), 1747–1754. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.713336
   Google Scholar
• Lang, T. (2015). Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: A research agenda. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64(3), 171–185. doi: 10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2
   Google Scholar
• Lang, T., Henn, S., Sgibnev, W., & Ehrlich, K. (Eds.). (2015). Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2015). Rebalancing the spatial economy: The challenge for regional theory. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3(3), 235–272. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1064825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Pike, A., Tyler, P., & Gardiner, B. (2016). Spatially rebalancing the UK economy: Towards a new policy model? Regional Studies, 50(2), 342–357. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1118450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., & Paasi, A. (2013). From geopolitical to geoeconomic? The changing political rationalities of state space. Geopolitics, 18(2), 267–283. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2012.723287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. (2013). The new geography of jobs. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2004). Sustainable regions: Governance, innovation and scale. European Planning Studies, 12(6), 871–889. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000251909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2013). Path dependence and the state: The politics of novelty in old industrial regions. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation and transition (pp. 318–340). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016a). Collective entrepreneurship: The Basque model of innovation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1544–1560. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1151483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016b). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16645106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuur, C., & Laestadius, S. (2010). Development in peripheral regions: Case studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(3), 293–307. doi: 10.1177/0969776409352156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). How’s life? 2013: Measuring well-being. Paris: Author. doi: 10.1787/9789264201392-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2016). OECD regional outlook 2016: Productive regions for inclusive societies. Paris: Author. doi: 10.1787/9789264260245-en
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2017). Local and regional development (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A., Ploger, J., & Winkler, A. (2010). Phoenix cities: The fall and rise of great industrial cities. CASE studies on poverty, place and policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Wilkie, C. (2015). Conceptualising equitable economic growth in cities. Cities Alliance. (Discussion Paper No. 2). Retrieved from http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/publications/1816%20UNOPS_lowres200815.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2013). The future of planning: Beyond growth dependence. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smętkowski, M. (2017). The role of exo- and endogenous factors in growth of regions in Central and Eastern Europe: Metropolitan/non-metropolitan divide in pre- and post-crisis era. European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361585
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N. P., & Osman, T. (2015). The rise and fall of urban economies. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Storrank, B. (2017). Unlocking regional potentials: Nordic experiences of natural and cultural heritage as a resource in sustainable regional development. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Stryjakiewicz, T., Kudłak, R., Ciesiółka, P., Kołsut, B., & Motek, P. (2017). Urban renewal in Poland’s non-core regions. European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361603
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2012). Spatial planning and governance: Understanding UK planning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J. (2017). Region and place III: Well-being. Progress in Human Geography, 41(1), 99–107. doi: 10.1177/0309132515601775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Agtmael, A., & Bakker, F. (2016). The smartest places on earth: Why rustbelts are the emerging hotspots of global innovation. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Vey, J. (2007). Restoring prosperity: The state role in revitalizing America’s older industrial cities. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2007/05/metropolitanpolicy-vey
   Google Scholar
• Watcher, S. M., & Zeuli, K. A. (2014). Revitalizing American cities. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar