Re-thinking non-core regions: planning strategies and practices beyond growth

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 31, 743–758. doi: 10.1068/b3065
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., Cameron, A., & Hudson, R. (2002). Placing the social economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ballas, D., Dorling, D., & Hennig, B. (2017). Analysing the regional geography of poverty, austerity and inequality in Europe: A human cartographic perspective. Regional Studies, 51, 174–185. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1262019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, J. B. (1999). Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: A retrospective view. Part 1. Origins and advocacy. Urban Studies, 36, 1195–1215. doi: 10.1080/0042098993187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2011). The relational economy: Geographies of knowing and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2011). Where do prices come from? Sociological approaches to price formation. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 757–786. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwr012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetz, S. (2008). Peripherisierung als räumliche Organisation sozialer Ungleichheit. In E. Barlösius & C. Neu (Eds.), Peripherisierung – eine neue Form sozialer Ungleichheit? [Peripheralisation – a new social inequality?] (pp. 7–16). Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Bernt, M., Haase, A., Großmann, K., Cocks, M., Couch, C., Cortese, C., & Krzysztofik, R. (2014). How does(n’t) urban shrinkage get onto the agenda? Experiences from Leipzig, Liverpool, Genoa and Bytom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 1749–1766. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürcher, S., & Mayer, H. (2017). Are there differences in social capital related to corporate regional engagement in dynamic and less dynamic non-core regions? [Special issue]. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Introduction: Regional growth and development theories in the twenty-first century – recent theoretical advances and future challenges. In R. Capello & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional growth and development theories (pp. 1–16). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B. (2011). Soziale Innovationen, Social Entrepreneurs und Raumbezüge. In P. Jaehnke, G. B. Christmann, & K. Balgar (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship. Perspektiven für die Raumentwicklung (pp. 193–210). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Combes, P. P., & Overman, H. G. (2004). The spatial distribution of economic activities in the European Union. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (pp. 2845–2909). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Copus, A. K. (2001). From core-periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies, 9, 539–552. doi: 10.1080/09654310120049899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copus, A. K., Skuras, D., & Tsegenidi, K. (2008). Innovation and peripherality: An empirical comparative study of SMEs in six European Union member countries. Economic Geography, 84, 51–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danson, M. (2009). New regions and regionalisation through clusters: City-regions and new problems for the periphery. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22, 260–271. doi: 10.1108/09513550910949235
   Google Scholar
• Danson, M., & De Souza, P. (Eds.). (2012). Regional development in Northern Europe: Peripherality, marginality and border issues. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dax, T., & Fischer, M. (2017). An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline [Special issue]. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• De Noronha Vaz, T., Morgan, E. J., & & Nijkamp, P. (2006). The new rurality: Strategies for small firms. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., Gloersen, E., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., Damsgaard, O., Grasland, C., Ysebaert, R., … Thomas, R. (2007). Regional disparities and cohesion: What strategies for the future? Report to the directorate general internal policies of the union. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, K., & Lang, T. (2012). Soziale Unternehmen und Initiativen in Deutschland – auf dem Weg zu einer neuen sozialen Ökonomie? [Social Cooperations and Initiatives in Germany - on the path to a new social economy?]. Retrieved from http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/31711/ssoar-2012-ehrlich_et_al-Soziale_Unternehmen_und_Initiativen_in.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2008). (Re)producing a ‘peripheral’ region – Northern Sweden in the news. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(4), 369–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission [EC]. (2010). Europe 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020, 3 March. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Ezcurra, R., Pascual, P., & Rapún, M. (2007). The dynamics of regional disparities in Central and Eastern Europe during transition. European Planning Studies, 15, 1397–1421. doi: 10.1080/09654310701550850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadda, S., & Tridico, P. (Eds.). (2014). Institutions and economic development after the financial crisis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faruqee, H., Scott, A., & Tamirisa, N. (2010). In search of a smoking gun: Macroeconomic policies and the crisis. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25, 553–580. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grp037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. (2015). The green economy agenda: Business as usual or transformational discourse? Environmental Politics, 24, 17–37. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.919748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freshwater, D. (2015). Vulnerability and resilience: Two dimensions of rurality. Sociologia Ruralis, 55, 497–515. doi: 10.1111/soru.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galland, D. (2012). Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 536–552. doi: 10.1068/c11150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatrell, J. D. (1999). Re-thinking economic development in peripheral regions. The Social Science Journal, 36, 623–639. doi: 10.1016/S0362-3319(99)00045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler, J. (2013). Knowledge, networks and space: Connectivity and the problem of non-interactive learning. Regional Studies, 47, 880–894. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.779659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (2003). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure. The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2014). Economic approaches to the rural. In G. Bosworth & P. Somerville (Eds.), Interpreting rurality. Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 32–53). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haapanen, L., & Tapio, P. (2016). Economic growth as phenomenon, institution and ideology: A qualitative content analysis of the 21st century growth critique. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3492–3503. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, A., Athanasopoulou, A., & Rink, D. (2016). Urban shrinkage as an emerging concern for European policymaking. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23, 103–107. doi: 10.1177/0969776413481371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjimichalis, C. (2011). Uneven geographical development and socio-spatial justice and solidarity: European regions after the 2009 financial crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18, 254–274. doi: 10.1177/0969776411404873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjimichalis, C., & Hudson, R. (2014). Contemporary crisis across Europe and the crisis of regional development. Regional Studies, 48, 208–218. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.834044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggart, K. (Ed.). (2005). The City’s Hinterland. Dynamism and divergence in Europe’s peri-urban territories. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J., & Beugelsdijk, S. (2002). Regional cluster policies: Learning by comparing? Kyklos, 55, 381–402. doi: 10.1111/1467-6435.00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. (2005). Economic geographies. Circuits, flows and spaces. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, A., & Johnston, A. (2009). Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region. Growth and Change, 40, 227–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, M. (2013). Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 367–378. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.862518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinossian, N. (2017). Planning strategies and practices in non-core regions: A critical response [Special issue]. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, J. P. (2017). Vicarious habitation – Reinterpreting the role of peripheral living in a Nordic context [Special issue]. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Küpper, P., Kundolf, S., Mettenberger, T., & Tuitjer, G. (2017). Rural regeneration strategies for declining regions: Trade-off between novelty and practicability [Special issue]. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, M., & Bernt, M. (2013). Peripheralization and power. In A. Fischer-Tahir, & M. Naumann (Eds.), Peripheralization: The making of spatial dependencies and social injustice (pp. 302–317). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Labrianidis, L. (2006). Fostering entrepreneurship as a means to overcome barriers to development of rural peripheral areas in Europe. European Planning Studies, 14, 3–8. doi: 10.1080/09654310500339067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist theory: Toward a radical and plural democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. (1999). Regional anchoring and modernization strategies in non-core regions: Evidence from the UK and Germany. European Planning Studies, 7, 775–792. doi: 10.1080/09654319908720553
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. (2000). Learning in non-core regions – towards ‘intelligent clusters’ addressing business and regional needs. In F. Boekema, K. Morgan, S. Bakkers, & R. Rutten (Eds.), Knowledge, innovation and economic growth: The theory and practice of learning regions (pp. 165–191). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A., & Lorentzen, A. (2007). Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the Intersection Between Geographical and Organizational Proximity. European Planning Studies, 15, 457–466. doi: 10.1080/09654310601133260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T. (2012). Shrinkage, metropolization and peripheralization in East Germany. European Planning Studies, 20, 1747–1754. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T. (2015). Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: A research agenda. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64, 171–185. doi: 10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2
   Google Scholar
• Lang, T., Henn, S., Ehrlich, K., & Sgibnev, W. (Eds.). (2015). Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization: Perspectives from central and Eastern Europe and beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. (1998). Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe? The World Economy, 21, 757–774. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2015). Rebalancing the spatial economy: The challenge for regional theory. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3, 235–272. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1064825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Fernandez, C., Kubo, N., Noya, A., & Weyman, T. (2012). Demographic change and local development: Shrinkage, regeneration and social dynamics. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions. ‘Ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6, 9–25. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matanle, P., & Sato, Y. (2010). Coming soon to a city near you! Learning to live ‘beyond growth’ in Japan's shrinking regions. Social Science Japan Journal, 13, 197–210. doi: 10.1093/ssjj/jyq01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuschewski, A., Leick, B., & Demuth, M. (2017). Growth-based theories for declining regions? A note on conceptualisations of demographic change for regional economic development. Comparative Population Studies, 41, 225–254. doi: 10.12765/CPoS-2017-04en
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. (2004). Urban political economy beyond the ‘Global City’. Urban Studies, 41, 2315–2333. doi: 10.1080/00420980412331297555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49, 1291–1302. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2005). Rural geography: Multifunctional rural geographies – reactionary or radical? Progress in Human Geography, 29, 773–782. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph584pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, R. (2013). Entrepreneurial innovation capability or rural regions: An underestimated phenomena? In C. Tamásy & J. Revilla Diez (Eds.), Regional resilience, economy and society. Globalising rural places (pp. 173–194). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, F., Miggelbrink, J., & Schwarzenberg, T. (2016). Reflecting on the margins: Socio-spatial stigmatisation among adolescents in a peripheralised region. Comparative Population Studies, 41, 285–320. doi: 10.12765/CPoS-2016-10en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2010). OECD regional typology. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2014). How’s life in your region? Measuring regional and local well-being for policy making. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264217416-en
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits All. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, G., & Thisse, J. F. (2004). Agglomeration and economic geography. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (pp. 2563–2608). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, O. (2016). Economic crisis and youth unemployment: Comparing Greece and Ireland. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 22, 409–426. doi: 10.1177/0959680116632326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2007). What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies, 41, 1253–1269. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2016). Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies, 51, 46–57. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1158802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2013). Le Capital au XXIe siècle [capital in the twenty-first century]. Paris: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D. (2016). Introduction: Crisis and renewal of contemporary urban planning. European Planning Studies, 24, 1237–1245. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puga, D. (2002). European regional policies in light of recent location theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 373–406. doi: 10.1093/jeg/2.4.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidolf, M. (2016). Knowledge networks and the nature of knowledge relationships of innovative rural SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19, 317–336. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-06-2015-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47, 1034–1047. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2013). The future of planning. Beyond growth dependence. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M. (2002a). Governing from below: Urban regions and the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M. (2002b). The nation-state and urban governance. Toward multilevel analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 611–641. doi: 10.1177/107808740203700501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2012). Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities (london, England), 29, S9–S18. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M., & Siemiatycki, E. (2016). The role of the scholar in times of crisis. European Planning Studies, 24, 1246–1261. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (2009). Hidden champions of the 21st century. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smętkowski, M. (2017). The role of exogenous and endogenous factors in the growth of regions in Central and Eastern Europe: the metropolitan/non-metropolitan divide in the pre- and post-crisis era [Special issue]. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, P., Halfacree, K., & Bosworth, G. (2014). Conclusion. Interrogating rural coherence. In G. Bosworth & P. Somerville (Eds.), Interpreting rurality. Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 278–296). Abingdon / Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, S., Psaltopoulos, D., & Skuras, D. (2004). Rural entrepreneurship in Europe: A research framework and agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 10, 404–425. doi: 10.1108/13552550410564725
   Google Scholar
• Steinführer, A., Küpper, P., & Tautz, A. (2014). Adapt and cope: Strategies for safeguarding the quality of life in a shrinking ageing region. Comparative Population Studies, 29, 345–370. doi: 10.12765/CPoS-2014-07en
   Google Scholar
• Stocker, M. (2013). Local heroes in Hungary. In P. Trąpczyński, Ł. Puślecki, & M. Jarosiński (Eds.), Competitiveness of CEE economies and businesses: Multidisciplinary perspectives on challenges and opportunities (pp. 211–223). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stryjakiewicz, T., Kudłak, R., Ciesiółka, P., Kołsut, B., & Motek, P. (2017). Urban regeneration in Poland’s non-core regions [Special issue]. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terluin, I. J. (2003). Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: An overview and critical analysis of theories. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 327–344. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uxó, J., & Álvarez, I. (2017). Is the end of fiscal austerity feasible in Spain? An alternative plan to the current stability programme (2015–2018). Cambridge Journal of Economics. doi: 10.1093/cje/bew069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (1999). Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/00343409950118878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkkala, S. (2006). Innovation and networking in peripheral areas: A case study of emergence and change in rural manufacturing. European Planning Studies, 15, 511–529. doi: 10.1080/09654310601133948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiest, K. (2016). Migration and everyday discourses: Peripheralisation in rural saxony-anhalt from a gender perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, B., Elis, V., Müller, B., & Yamamoto, K. (2016). Peripheralisation of small towns in Germany and Japan – Dealing with economic decline and population loss. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar