Economic challenges for the EU Water Framework Directive reform and implementation

References

• Arle, J., Mohaupt, V., & Kirst, I. (2016). Monitoring of surface waters in Germany under the Water Framework Directive – a review of approaches, methods and results. Water, 8(6), 217. doi: 10.3390/w8060217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin, D., & Varone, F. (2002). European water policy. A path towards an integrated resource management. EUWARENESS. AURAP-UCL, Louvain-La-Neuve.
   Google Scholar
• Balana, B. B., Vinten, A., & Slee, R. W. (2011). A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: Key issues, methods, and applications. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1021–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, O., Grunewald, K., & Syrbe, R. (2012). Space and time aspects of ecosystem services, using the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1–2), 5–16. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2011.631941
   Google Scholar
• Berbel, J., Martin-Ortega, J., & Mesa, P. (2011). A cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving measures for the Water Framework Directive: The case of the Guadalquivir river basin in southern Spain. Water Resources Management, 25(2), 623–640. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9717-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbel, J., & Mateos, L. (2014). Does investment in irrigation technology necessarily generate rebound effects? A simulation analysis based on an agro-economic model. Agricultural Systems, 128, 25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birol, E., Karousakis, K., & Koundouri, P. (2006). Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Science of the Total Environment, 365(1–3), 105–122. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeuf, B., & Fritsch, O. (2016). Studying the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Europe: A meta-analysis of 89 journal articles. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 19. doi:10.5751/ES-084411-210219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego-Marín, M. M., Gutiérrez-Martín, C., & Berbel, J. (2016). Estimation of cost recovery ratio for water services based on the system of environmental-economic accounting for water. Water Resources Management, 30(2), 767–783. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-1189-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouleau, G. (2008). The WFD dreams: Between ecology and economics. Water and Environment Journal, 22(4), 235–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2008.00122.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouleau, G., & Pont, D. (2015). Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science and Policy, 47, 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R. (2008). The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(5), 597–614. doi: 10.1080/09640560802207860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Water Resources. (2014). Public update for drought response – update 2014. Sacramento, CA: Department of Water Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. G., & White, I. (2012). Environmental planning and management in an age of uncertainty: The case of the Water Framework Directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Ohandja, D. G., Hoare, D., & Voulvoulis, N. (2012). Implementing the Water Framework Directive: A transition from established monitoring networks in England and Wales. Environmental Science and Policy, 17, 49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paoli, G., Mattheiss, V., & Strosser, P. (2012, September). Comparative study of pressures and measures in the major River Basin Management Plans in the EU. Task 4 b – Costs & Benefits of WFD implementation: Final report.
   Google Scholar
• De Stefano, L. (2010). Facing the Water Framework Directive challenges: A baseline of stakeholder participation in the European Union. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1332–1340. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy as amended by Decision 2455/2001/EC and Directives 2008/32/EC, 2008/105/EC and 2009/31/EC.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., & Piegay, H. (2009). From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: Forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications, 25(5), 568–581. doi: 10.1002/rra.1239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, B., & Graveland, C. (2014). Experimental valuation of Dutch water resources according to SNA and SEEA. Water Resources and Economics, 7, 66–81. doi: 10.1016/j.wre.2014.10.003
   Google Scholar
• van Engelen, D., Seidelin, C., van der Veeren, R., Barton, D. N., & Queb, K. (2008). Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Water Policy, 10(3), 207–220. doi: 10.2166/wp.2008.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano Francés, G., Quevauviller, P., San Martin González, E., & Vargas Amelin, E. (2017). Climate change policy and water resources in the EU and Spain. A closer look into the Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science and Policy, 69, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrela, T., & Vargas, E. (2012). Drought management plans in the European Union. The case of Spain. Water Resources Management, 26, 1537–1553. doi: 10.1007/s11269-011-9971-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012a). Report from the Commission to the European parliament and the council on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) River Basin management plans. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012b). A blueprint to safeguard Europe’s water resources. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015a). Guidance document on the application of water balances for supporting the implementation of the WFD. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015b, December). Workshop on a study on the economic benefits of the EU water policy and the costs of non-implementation. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015c). Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the circular economy (COM/2015/0614 final). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2013). Assessment of cost recovery through water pricing (Technical Report No. 16/2013). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2003a). Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) (Guidance Document No. 1). Economics and the environment: The implementation challenge of the Water Framework Directive (WATECO). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2003b). Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) (Guidance Document No. 8). Public participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Feuillette, S., Levrel, H., Boeuf, B., Blanquart, S., Gorin, O., Monaco, G., … Robichon, S. (2016). The use of cost–benefit analysis in environmental policies: Some issues raised by the Water Framework Directive implementation in France. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawel, E. (2014). Article 9 of the EU Water Framework Directive: Do we really need to calculate environmental and resource costs? Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 11(3), 249–271. doi: 10.1163/18760104-01103004
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Limon, J. A., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2011). Nuevos enfoques de la Directiva Marco del Agua para la gestión del recurso. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 29, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, R. Q. (2017). Editorial: Water reform and planning in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Water Economics and Policy, 3, 1702001. doi: 10.1142/S2382624X17020015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham, T. E., & Viers, J. H. (2014). 100 years of California’s water rights system: Patterns, trends and uncertainty. Environmental Research Letters, 9(8), 084012. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/084012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C. (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammitt, J. K., Wiener, J. B., Swedlow, B., Kall, D., & Zhou, Z. (2005). Precautionary regulation in Europe and the United States: A quantitative comparison. Risk Analysis, 25(5), 1215–1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00662.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering, D., Borja, A., Carstensen, J., Carvahlo, L., Elliott, M., Feld, C. K., … van der Bund, W. (2010). The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment, 408(19), 4007–4019. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, W. (2005). The progression towards ecological quality standards. Journal of Environmental Law, 18(1), 3–35. doi:10.1093/jel/eqi049
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, W. (2009). Aspirations and realities under the Water Framework Directive: Proceduralisation, participation and practicalities. Journal of Environmental Law, 21(3), 391–417. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqp019
   Google Scholar
• Josefsson, H. (2012). Achieving ecological objectives. Laws, 1(1), 39–63. doi: 10.3390/laws1010039
   Google Scholar
• Kaika, M. (2003). The Water Framework Directive: A new directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. European Planning Studies, 11(3), 299–316. doi: 10.1080/09654310303640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., & Butler, D. (2001). The EU Water Framework Directive: Measures and implications. Water Policy, 3(3), 125–142. doi: 10.1016/S1366-7017(01)00007-1
   Google Scholar
• Kanakoudis, V., & Tsitsifli, S. (2010). On-going evaluation of the WFD 2000/60/EC implementation process in the European Union, seven years after its launch: Are we behind schedule? Water Policy, 12(1), 70–91. doi:10.2166/wp.2009.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, B., Sigel, K., & Schiller, J. (2016). Disproportionate costs in the EU Water Framework Directive – how to justify less stringent environmental objectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 59, 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Notte, A., Maes, J., Dalmazzone, S., Crossman, N. D., Grizzetti, B., & Bidoglio, G. (2017). Physical and monetary ecosystem service accounts for Europe: A case study for in-stream nitrogen retention. Ecosystem Services, 23, 18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, J., Liquete, C., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Paracchini, M. L., Barredo, J. I., … Lavalle, C. (2016). An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services, 17, 14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, R. (2017). The WFD implementation in the European member states. Water Resources Management, 31, 3043–3060. doi: 10.1007/s11269-017-1723-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Ortega, J. (2012). Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science and Policy, 24, 83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Ortega, J., Perni, A., Jackson-Blake, L., Balana, B. B., Mckee, A., Dunn, S., … Slee, B. (2015). A transdisciplinary approach to the economic analysis of the European Water Framework Directive. Ecological Economics, 116, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, D., & Dann, S. (2008). The economic value of water use: Implications for implementing the Water Framework Directive in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(3), 484–496. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, B. (2007). Shallow lakes, the Water Framework Directive and life. What should it all be about? Hydrobiologia, 584, 381–394. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-0601-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, B. (2008). The Water Framework Directive: Total environment or political compromise? Science of the Total Environment, 400(1–3), 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouratiadou, I., Russell, G., Topp, C., Louhichi, K., & Moran, D. (2010). Modelling common agricultural policy-Water Framework Directive interactions and cost-effectiveness of measures to reduce nitrogen pollution. Water Science and Technology, 61(10), 2689–2697. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Meeting the water reform challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Water resources allocation: Sharing risks and opportunities. OECD Studies on Water. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Quevauviller, P. (2014). European water policy and research on water-related topics – an overview. Journal of Hydrology, 518, 180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quevauviller, P., Balabanis, P., Fragakis, C., Weydert, M., Oliver, M., Kaschl, A., … Bidoglio, G. (2005). Science-policy integration needs in support of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(3), 203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective water governance (Vol. 7). Stockholm: Global Water Partnership/Swedish International Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Strosser, P., & de Paoli, G. (2013, October 1–2). Background document for the Workshop ‘Supporting a better economic analysis for the 2nd RBMP and beyond’. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). System of environmental-economic accounting for water. New York, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division.
   Google Scholar
• Voulvoulis, N., Arpon, K. D., & Giakoumis, T. (2017). The EU Water Framework Directive: From great expectations to problems with implementation. Science of the Total Environment, 575, 358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, B., Murray, S. N., & O’Sullivan, D. T. J. (2015). The water energy nexus, an ISO50001 water case study and the need for a water value system. Water Resources and Industry, 10, 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, F. A. (2009). Economics in integrated water management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 24(8), 948–958. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilby, R. L., Orr, H. G., Hedger, M., Forrow, D., & Blackmore, M. (2006). Risks posed by climate change to the delivery of Water Framework Directive objectives in the UK. Environment International, 32(8), 1043–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite, D. (2011). Breaking the hydro-illogical cycle: Progress or status quo for drought management in the United States. European Water, 34, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. A. L., & Fritsch, O. (2011). Operationalising active involvement in the EU Water Framework Directive: Why, when and how? Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2268–2274. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar