The spatiality of trust in EU external cross-border cooperation

References

• Ademmer, E. (2015). Interdependence and EU demanded policy change in a shared neighbourhood. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 671–689. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.968189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80. doi: 10.1080/09692299408434268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T., & Sielker, F. (2014). Europeanizing territoriality – towards soft spaces? Environment and Planning A, 46, 2703–2717. doi: 10.1068/a130037p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boedeltje, F., & van Houtum, H. (2011). Brussels is speaking: The adverse speech geo-politics of the European Union towards its neighbours. Geopolitics, 16(1), 130–145. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2010.493791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J., & Berg, E. (2007). Identity and institutions shaping cross-border cooperation at the margins of the European Union. Regional and Federal Studies, 17(2), 195–215. doi: 10.1080/13597560701318516
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S., & Christou, G. (2010). The constitutive power of outsiders: The European neighbourhood policy and the eastern dimension. Political Geography, 29, 109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callanan, M., & Tatham, M. (2014). Territorial interest representation in the European Union: Actors, objectives and strategies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(2), 188–210. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.829579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., Evrard, E., & Schulz, C. (2012). On the territoriality of cross-border cooperation: ‘Institutional Mapping’ in a multi-level context. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 961–980. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.673563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation. (1638/2006). EC on the general provisions establishing a European neighbourhood and partnership instrument, 2006 O.J. L310/1. Retrieved from http://filj.lawreviewnetwork.com/files/2011/10/EU_Citation_Manual_2010–2011_for_Website.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation. (232/2014). EC on establishing a European neighbourhood instrument. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2014:077:0027:0043:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation. (99/2000). EC on the provision of assistance to the partner states in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/uri=CELEX:32000R0099&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2016). Building a cross-border territorial strategy between four countries: Wishful thinking? European Planning Studies, 24(10), 1825–1843. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1195796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, V. A. (2013). The EU and Russia: Competing discourses, practices and interests in the shared neighbourhood. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 14(2), 256–271. doi: 10.1080/15705854.2013.785261
   Google Scholar
• EEAS & European Commission. (2014). Programming of the European neighbourhood instrument (ENI) – 2014–2020. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/enp/pdf/financing-the-enp/cbc_2014-2020_programming_document_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2014). Special meeting of the European council. EUCO 147/14. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143992.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., Németh, S., Piipponen, M., & Yarovoy, G. (2015). Whose partnership? Regional participatory arrangements in CBC programming on the Finnish-Russian border. European Planning Studies, 23(12), 2582–2599. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1096916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkli, J. (2009a). Geographies of trust. Ch. 1. In J. Häkli & C. Minca (Eds.), Social capital and urban networks of trust (pp. 13–36). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Häkli, J. (2009b). Boundaries of trust: Building a transnational space in Haparanda-Tornio. Ch. 8. In J. Häkli & C. Minca (Eds.), Social capital and urban networks of trust (pp. 205–232). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Haukkala, H. (2015). From cooperative to contested Europe? The conflict in Ukraine as a culmination of a long-term crisis in EU-Russia relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 23(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakola, F. (2016). Borders, planning and policy transfer: Historical transformation of development discourses in the Finnish Torne Valley. European Planning Studies, 24(10), 1806–1824. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1194808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakola, F., & Prokkola, E. K. (2017). Trust-building or vested interest? Social capital processes of cross-border cooperation in the border towns of Tornio and Haparanda. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. doi:10.1111/tesg.12279
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (2009). Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in Central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(2), 177–191. doi: 10.1177/0969776409102190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazantsev, A., & Sakwa, R. (2012). New ‘dividing lines’ in Europe: A crisis of trust in European-Russian relations. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45, 289–293. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keep.eu.. (2017). INTERACT. Retrieved from https://www.keep.eu/keep/dataprogramme
   Google Scholar
• Khasson, V. (2013). Cross-border cooperation over the Eastern EU border: Between assistance and partnership under the European neighbourhood and partnership instrument. East European Politics, 29(3), 328–343. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2013.807802
   Google Scholar
• Klein-Hitpaß, K., Leibenath, M., & Knippschild, R. (2006). Vertrauen in grenzüberschreitenden Akteursnetzwerken [Trust in cross-border actor networks]. DisP – The Planning Review, 42(116), 59–70. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2006.10556948
   Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, E., Natorski, M., & Simão, L. (2013). The eastern dimension of the European policy: Practices, instruments and social structures. East European Politics, 29(3), 257–272. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2013.807801
   Google Scholar
• Kroeger, L. (2011). Trusting organizations: The institutionalisation of trust in interorganisational relationships. Organization, 19(6), 743–763. doi:10.1177/1350508411420900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, J. (2017). European civic neighbourhood: Towards a bottom-up agenda across borders. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108(2), 220–233. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. (2009). Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 369–391. doi: 10.1080/14649350903229810
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2015). Planning in Europe for ‘EU’rope: Spatial planning as a political technology of territory. Planning Theory, 14(2), 174–194. doi: 10.1177/1473095213519355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: Why it matters? Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023–1039. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.607806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, C. (2013). European Union cross-border cooperation and conflict amelioration. Space and Polity, 17(2), 197–216. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2013.817512
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. (2009). Neighbouring area cooperation. Retrieved from http://formin.finland.fi/public/default.aspx?contentid=325104&contentlan=2&culture=en-US
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, G., & Mohan, J. (2002). Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography, 26(2), 191–210. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph364ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T. (2006). Building trust in economic space. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 427–450. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph617oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natorski, M., & Pomorska, K. (2017). Trust and decision-making in times of crisis: The EU’s response to the events in Ukraine. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 54–70. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Mattes, J. (2015). The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts. European Management Journal, 33(4), 230–244. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NordRegio. (2007, July). The European neighbourhood and partnership instrument (ENPI) cross-border cooperation programmes 2007–2013. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.se/Templates/NordRegio/Pages/MapPage.aspx?id=567&epslanguage=en
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2008). Is the world more complex than our theories of it? TPSN and the perpetual challenge of conceptualization. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 405–410. doi: 10.1068/d9107c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., & Zimmerbauer, K. (2016). Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 48(1), 75–93. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15594805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, G. (2008). The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, 27, 418–438. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S., Geuijen, K., Candel, J., Folgerts, O., & Hooijer, R. (2016). Establishing cross-border co-operation between professional organizations: Police, fire brigades and emergency health services in Dutch border regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 497–512. doi: 10.1177/0969776414522082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokkola, E. K. (2011). Cross-border regionalization, the INTERREG III a initiative, and local cooperation at the Finnish-Swedish border. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1190–1208. doi: 10.1068/a43433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, S., Mäntysalo, R., Hytönen, J., & Jarenko, K. (2016). The ‘deliberative bureaucrat’: Deliberative democracy and institutional trust in the jurisdiction of the Finnish planner. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(1), 71–88. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1245437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippl, S., Petrat, A., Kindervater, A., & Boehnke, K. (2009). Transnational social capital: Are border regions a laboratory of social integration in Europe? Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 19, 79–103. doi: 10.1007/s11609-009-0056-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, S. (2011a). Managing distrust in the wider Black Sea region. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11(3), 215–225. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2011.589149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, S. (2011b). Strategies for nurturing trust in the wider Black Sea region. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11(3), 333–343. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2011.589148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (2013). Constructing familiarity in Finnish-Russian Karelia: Shifting uses of history and the re-interpretation of regions. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 75–92. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.716240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffelen, A., Ioannides, D., & Vanneste, D. (2017). Obstacles to achieving cross-border tourism governance: A multi-scalar approach focusing on the German-Czech borderlands. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 126–138. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffelen, A., & Vanneste, D. (2017). Tourism and cross-border regional development: Insights in European contexts. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 1013–1033. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1291585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, S. (2015). The bordered world of cross-border cooperation: The determinants of local government contact networks within Euroregions. Regional & Federal Studies, 25(3), 277–295. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2015.1043995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switzer, A., Janssen-Jansen, L., & Bertolini, L. (2013). Inter-actor trust in the planning process: The case of transit-oriented development. European Planning Studies, 21(8), 1153–1175. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust. A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tennberg, M. (2007). Trust in international environmental cooperation in Northwestern Russia. Cooperation and Conflict, 42(3), 321–335. doi: 10.1177/0010836707079935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. (2010). Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101(2), 150–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varró, K. (2016). Recognising the emerging transnational spaces and subjectivities of cross-border cooperation: Towards a research agenda. Geopolitics, 21(1), 171–194. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2015.1094462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, M. R., Rivera, R. E. N., Conway, B., Yonkoski, J., Lupton, P. M., & Giancola, R. (2005). Determinants and consequences of social trust. Sociological Inquiry, 75(4), 453–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar