The ‘natures’ of planning: evolving conceptualizations of nature as expressed in urban planning theory and practice

References

• Abercrombie, P. (1945). Greater London plan 1944. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D., Scott, A., & Hardman, M. (2013). Guerrilla warfare in the planning system: Revolutionary progress towards sustainability? Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95, 375–387. doi: 10.1111/geob.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agyeman, J., & Evans, T. (2003). Toward just sustainability in urban communities: Building equity rights with sustainable solutions. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 590, 35–53. doi: 10.1177/0002716203256565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amati, M. (2008). Green belts: A twentieth-century planning experiment. In M. Amati (Ed.), Urban green belts in the twenty-first century (pp. 1–17). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Amati, M., & Taylor, L. (2010). From green belts to green infrastructure. Planning Practice & Research, 25(2), 143–155. doi: 10.1080/02697451003740122
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., Colding, J., Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., & Gren, A. (2014). Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. AMBIO, 43(4), 445–453. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguelovski, I. (2016). From toxic sites to parks as (green) LULUs? New challenges of inequity, privilege, gentrification, and exclusion for urban environmental justice. Journal of Planning Literature, 31(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1177/0885412215610491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, G. (2014). Green infrastructure for landscape planning: Integrating human and natural systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. (2006). Sustainable development. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. (2003). Ecological modernisation. In J. Proops, & E. Page (Eds.), Environmental Thought (pp. 191–214). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. (2007). Environment and social theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baycan-Levent, T., Vreeker, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). A multi-criteria evaluation of green spaces in European cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(2), 193–213. doi: 10.1177/0969776408101683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatley, T., & Manning, K. (1997). The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy, and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. (2016). Planning for biophilic cities: From theory to practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict, M., & McMahon, E. (2006). Green infrastructure: Linking landscapes and communities. London: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29(2), 293–301. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botkin, D. B., & Beveridge, C. E. (1997). Cities as environments. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 3–19. doi: 10.1023/A:1014354923367
   Google Scholar
• Breheny, M. (1997). Urban compaction: Feasible and acceptable? Cities, 14(4), 209–217. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., McInerney, D., Hochstrasser, T., & Hayden, T. (2009). Where have all the parks gone? Changes in Dublin’s green space between 1900 and 2006. Dublin: Working Paper Series, University College Dublin Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2013). Cities and climate change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F. (2014). Eco-urbanism and the eco-city, or, denying the right to the city? Antipode, 46(4), 1285–1303. doi: 10.1111/anti.12087
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (2007). The politics of the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. (2014). Making sense of nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, G. E. (1975). Environmental planning volume II: 1939–1969. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, G. E., & Rogers, A. (1996). Rural change and planning: England and Wales in the twentieth century. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, P. (1998). Nature: Western attitudes since ancient times. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S. (2007). Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment, 12(3), 259–278. doi: 10.1080/13549830601183289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council Directive (EC) 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the Conservation of Wild Birds.
   Google Scholar
• Council Directive (EC) 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora.
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., Nadin, V., Hart, T., et al. (2014). Town and country planning in the UK. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, T. L. (2009). A trail across time: American environmental planning from city beautiful to sustainability. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 178–192. doi: 10.1080/01944360902748206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., Hull, A., & Healey, P. (1996). Environmental concerns and economic imperatives in strategic plan making. Town Planning Review, 67, 421–436. doi: 10.3828/tpr.67.4.n0317k7p2h72n622
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2012). Climate risk and security: New meanings of “the environment” in the English planning system. European Planning Studies, 20, 49–69. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.638491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, R. S., Fisher, R., Christie, M., Aronson, J., Braat, L. C., Haines-Young, R., … Ring, I. (2010). Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In P. Kumar (Ed.), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations (pp. 3–40). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Demuzere, M., Orru, K., Heidrich, O., Olazabal, E., Geneletti, D., Orru, H., … Faehnle, M. (2014). Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Roo, G., & Miller, D. (2000). Introduction – compact cities and sustainable development. In G. de Roo & D. Miller (Eds.), Compact cities and sustainable urban development (pp. 1–13). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dublin City Council. (2016c). Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022. Dublin: Dublin City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dublin City Council. (2011). Dublin city development plan 2011–2017. Dublin: Dublin City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dublin City Council. (2016a). About Dublin city council. Retrieved from http://www.dublincity.ie/main-menu-your-council/about-dublin-city-council
   Google Scholar
• Dublin City Council. (2016b). History of Dublin city council. Retrieved from http://www.dublincity.ie/main-menu-your-council-about-dublin-city-council/history-dublin-city-council
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Corporation. (1971). Dublin city development plan 1971. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Corporation. (1991). Dublin city development plan 1991. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Corporation. (1999). Dublin city development plan 1999. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, D. (2006). Metrogreen: Connecting open space in North American cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. (2011). Nature in the city: Urban environmental history and central park. Organization of American Historians: Magazine of History, 25(4), 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fouchier, V. (2000). The case of the Paris Region, and its urban density and mobility: What do we know? What can we do? In G. de Roo & D. Miller (Eds.), Compact cities and sustainable urban development (pp. 241–250). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. (2002). Nature and social theory. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. E., Handley, J. F., Ennos, A. R., & Pauleit, S. (2007). Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment, 33(1), 115–133. doi: 10.2148/benv.33.1.115
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (1963). Planning and development act. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (2000). Planning and development act. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Haase, D. (2016). Reflections on urban landscapes, ecosystem services and nature based solutions in cities. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 276–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, S. (2015). Ecological urbanism: The nature of the city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2005). Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance (pp. 297–315). Hampshire: Palsgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In M. van den Brink & T. Metze (Eds.), Words matter in policy and planning – discourse theory and method in the social sciences (pp. 65–74), Netherlands Geographical Studies 344. Utrecht: KNAG/Nethur.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2011). Urban and regional planning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, A. (1999). Analysing power relations in partnerships: Is there a role for discourse analysis? Urban Studies, 36(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1080/0042098993754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1981). Leviathan. London: Penguin (originally published, 1651).
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (1946). Garden cities of tomorrow. London: Faber and Faber (originally printed 1902).
   Google Scholar
• Howley, P., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2009). Sustainability versus liveability: An investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(6), 847–864. doi: 10.1080/09640560903083798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 38–52. doi: 10.1177/0739456X05285119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (1999). Key themes and future prospects: Conclusion to the special issue. Urban Studies, 36, 203–213. doi: 10.1080/0042098993826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (1996). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Joss, S., Cowley, R., & Tomozieu, D. (2013). Towards the ‘ubiquitous eco-city’: An analysis of the internationalisation of eco-city policy and practice. Urban Research and Practice, 6(1), 54–74. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2012.762216
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, J. (2010). Making eco-cities a reality: Some key dimensions for eco city development with best practice examples. In Z. Tang (Ed.), Eco-city and green community: The evolution of planning theory and practice (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kos, D. (2008). Nature in the city or the city in nature? Urbani izziv, 19(2), 129–132. doi: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2008-19-02-001
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2015a). Explaining the currency of novel policy concepts: Learning from green infrastructure planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 1039–1057. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15605939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2015b). Green infrastructure and planning policy: A critical assessment. Local Environment, 20(8), 957–980. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2014.880411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., Scott, M., Collier, M., & Foley, K. (2017). The emergence of green infrastructure as promoting the centralisation of a landscape perspective in spatial planning – the case of Ireland. Landscape Research, 42, 146–163. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1229460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2014). Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: Reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Planning Review, 85, 563–587. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2014.35
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2016). Re-naturing the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 270–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I. (2013). Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? Examining the “green” of green infrastructure development. Local Environment, 18(2), 152–166. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.719019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I. (2016). Global green infrastructure: Lessons for successful policy-making, investment and management. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystems Assessment. (2005). Millennium ecosystems assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. (1945). The garden city idea and modern planning. In E. Howard (Ed.), Garden cities of tomorrow (pp. 29–40). London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Mháille Battel, R. (2003). Ireland’s “celtic tiger” economy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(1), 93–111. doi: 10.1177/0162243902238497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2011). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Register, R. (1987). Ecocity Berkeley: Building cities for a healthy future. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M., & Farley, P. (2011). Edgelands: Journeys into England’s true wilderness. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, M., & Mell, I. (2013). Negotiating value and priorities: Evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), 650–673. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.693454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, D., & Bunster-Ossa, I. F. (2013). Green infrastructure: A landscape approach. Washington, DC, U.S.A. American Planning Association: Planning Advisory Service Report Number 571.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, D. (2015). Not just a park. The inevitability of urban nature in contemporary city design. Journal of Urban Design, 20(3), 318–320. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1030993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, U. G., Angelstam, P., & Khakee, A. (2006). Urban comprehensive planning – identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 43–57. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A., Carter, C., Reed, M., Larkham, P., Adams, D., Morton, N., … Coles, R. (2013). Disintegrated development at the rural–urban fringe: Re-connecting spatial planning theory and practice. Progress in Planning, 83, 1–52. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M., Lennon, M., Haase, D., Kazmierczak, A., Clabby, G., & Beatley, T. (2016). Nature-based solutions and the contemporary city. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 267–300. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1158907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman, P. (1995). Local sustainability: Can the planning system help get us from here to there? Town Planning Review, 66, 267–302. doi: 10.3828/tpr.66.3.j451854764541u7x
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi, A. (2016). From Garden City to Eco-Urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnett, D., Smith, N., & Burgess, S. (2015). Handbook on green infrastructure: Planning, design and implementation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Snellen, D. M. E. G. W., Borgers, A. W. J., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2000). Towards an evaluation methodology for urban concepts. In G. de Roo & D. Miller (Eds.), Compact cities and sustainable urban development (pp. 53–64). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380. doi: 10.1177/1049732307307031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, L. (2010). Responding to the risks posed by climate change: Cities have no choice but to adapt. Town Planning Review, 81(3), 217–235. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2010.5
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., & Wei, T. (2010). The history and evolution of eco-city and green community. In Z. Tang (Ed.), Eco-city and green community: The evolution of planning theory and practice (pp. 11–35). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. (2016). Ecosystem services. Retrieved from http://www.teebweb.org/resources/ecosystem-services/
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. (1963). London’s green belt: The evolution of an idea. The Geographical Journal, 129(1), 14–24. doi: 10.2307/1794894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Littlewood, S. (2010). From green belts to green infrastructure? The evolution of a new concept in the emerging soft governance of spatial strategies. Planning Practice and Research, 25(2), 203–222. doi: 10.1080/02697451003740213
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. W., Aspinall, P., & Bell, S. (2010). Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health: Open space: People space 2. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tsolakis, N., & Anthopoulos, L. (2015). Eco-cities: An integrated system dynamics framework and a concise research taxonomy. Sustainable Cities and Society, 17, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kazmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2016). The World’s Cities in 2016 – Data Booklet. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs – Population Division.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, R. (1909). Town planning in practice. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press, (Reprint 1994).
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, A. E., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 79–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, C., Saarne, T., Peterson, G. D., & Colding, J. (2013). Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept - an historical exploration. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 1–19. doi: 10.5751/ES-05368-180137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2016). Urban population (% of total), Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS [Accessed 21 August 2016].
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2010). Eco² cities: Ecological cities as economic cities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R., Zanders, J., Lieberknecht, K., & Fassman-Beck, E. (2014). A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2571–2583. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar