Informal institutional change in De Achterhoek region: from citizen initiatives to participatory governance

References

• Abbas, T., & Commandeur, L. (2013). Modern Noaberschap: Hype of houvast. Groenlo: Authors edition.
   Google Scholar
• Altrock, U. (2012). Conceptualising informality: Some thoughts on the way towards generalisation. In C. McFarlane & M. Waibel (Eds.), Urban informalities: Reflections on the formal and informal (pp. 171–193). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Azari, J. R., & Smith, J. K. (2012). Unwritten rules: Informal institutions in established democracies. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 37–55. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S. C. E. (2002). Evaluating policy implementation: The European Union’s small and medium sized enterprise policies in Galicia and Sardinia. Regional Studies, 36(8), 861–876. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000012306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B. (2016). Planning strategies in an age of active citizenship, a post-structuralist agenda for self-organization in spatial planning. Groningen: InPlanning.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & De Kam, G. (2012). The emergence of inclusionary housing: Continuity and change in the provision of land for social housing in the Netherlands. Housing, Theory and Society, 29(1), 56–74. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2011.592214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Galle, M., & Sorel, N. (2011). Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law. Environment and Planning A, 43(4), 928–941. doi: 10.1068/a43400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Grommen, E., & Van der Krabben, E. (2017). The self-organizing city: An analysis of the institutionalization of organic urban development in the Netherlands. In G. Squires, E. Heurkens, & R. Peiser (Eds.), Companion to real estate (pp. 167–182). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A., & Jacobs, W. (2007). A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 891–908. doi: 10.1068/a38191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, S. (2011). Constructing legitimacy in the new community governance. Urban Studies, 48(5), 929–946. doi: 10.1177/0042098010366744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, N. (2012). Community participation in spatial planning: Exploring relationships between professional and lay stakeholders. Local Government Studies, 38(3), 345–366. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.642948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Madanipour, A. (2015). Reconsidering localism. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I., & Doyle, J. (2013). Building community capacity under ‘austerity urbanism’: Stimulating, supporting and maintaining resident engagement in neighbourhood regeneration in Manchester. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 6(4), 365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Dembski, S., & Salet, W. (2010). The transformative potential of institutions: How symbolic markers can institute new social meaning in changing cities. Environment and Planning A, 42(3), 611–625. doi: 10.1068/a42184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eversole, R. (2012). Remaking participation: Challenges for community development practice. Community Development Journal, 47(1), 29–41. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsq033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, D. (2014). DIY urbanism: Implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(4), 381–398. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2014.891149
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N. (2013). Re-connecting ‘people and planning’: Parish plans and the English localism agenda. Town Planning Review, 84(3), 371–396. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2013.20
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (2010). Historical institutionalism in rationalist and sociological perspective. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 204–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3), 299–320. doi: 10.1080/09654310500420792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2015). Civil society enterprise and local development. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(1), 11–27. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2014.995212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Booher, D. E., Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., Ng, M. K., Peterson, P., & Albrechts, L. (2008). Civic engagement, spatial planning and democracy as a way of life civic engagement and the quality of urban places enhancing effective and democratic governance through empowered participation: Some critical reflections one humble journey towards planning for a more sustainable Hong Kong: A need to institutionalise civic engagement civic engagement and urban reform in Brazil setting the scene. Planning Theory & Practice, 9(3), 379–414. doi: 10.1080/14649350802277092
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740. doi: 10.1017/S1537592704040472
   Google Scholar
• Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (2001). Local democracy, democratic decentralisation and rural development: Theories, challenges and options for policy. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 521–532. doi: 10.1111/1467-7679.00149
   Google Scholar
• Larsson Taghizadeh, J. (2016). Power from below? The impact of protests and lobbying on school closures in Sweden. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (2005). Something old, something new, something borrowed … . Policy Studies, 26(3–4), 291–309. doi: 10.1080/01442870500198361
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & McCaughie, K. (2013). Weathering the perfect storm? Austerity and institutional resilience in local government. Policy & Politics, 41(4), 533–549. doi: 10.1332/030557312X655747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström, M. J., Fredriksson, C., & Witzel, J. (Eds.). (2013). Planning and sustainable urban development in Sweden. Stockholm: Föringen för samhällsplanering.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., & Myers, G. (2004). Focus groups. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 66–80). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.649951
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, M., Diaz-Varela, E., & Cardín-Pedrosa, M. (2015). Planning practices in Galicia: How communities compensate the lack of statutory planning using bottom up planning initiatives. Spanish Journal of Rural Development, VI(1–2), 65–80. doi: 10.5261/2015.GEN1.08
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, M., & Syssner, J. (2017). Getting ahead in depopulating areas – How linking social capital is used for informal planning practices in Sweden and The Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melis, K. (2011). Participatie als oplossing voor krimp. Rooilijn, 44(5), 340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of internal affairs (2013). De doe-democratie. Kabinetsnota ter stimulering van een vitale samenleving. Den Haag: Rijksoverheid.
   Google Scholar
• Mirck, K., & Aalvanger, A. (2013). Burgerschap in Krimpregio’s. Retrieved from Zelhem.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhija, V., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Reading the informal city: Why and how to deepen planners’ understanding of informality. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi: 10.1177/0739456x15591586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhand, J., Bekkers, V., & Voorberg, W. (2016). Self-organization and the role of government: How and why does self-organization evolve in the shadow of hierarchy? Public Management Review, 18(7), 1063–1084. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1066417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Not just what, but when: Timing and sequence in political processes. Studies in American Political Development, 14(1), 72–92. doi: 10.1017/S0898588X00003011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. (2011). The point is to change it. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(4), 477–480. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2011.626296
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Gelderland. (2013). Gevolgen bevolkingskrimp te lijf met nieuwe initiatieven. Gelderland Leeft, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruimtevolk. (2015). Verslag Landelijke Conferentie Bevolkingsdaling 2015 – Ruimte voor Talent. Paper presented at the Landelijke Conferentie Bevolkingsdaling 2015, Ulft.
   Google Scholar
• Syssner, J., & Meijer, M. (2017). Informal planning in depopulating rural areas: A resource-based view on informal planning practices. European Countryside, 9(3), 458–472. doi: 10.1515/euco-2017-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. S. (2006). Adaptive informal institutions and endogenous institutional change in China. World Politics, 59(01), 116–141. doi: 10.1353/wp.2007.0018
   Google Scholar
• Tubío-Sánchez, J. M., Ónega-López, F., Timmermans, W., & Crecente-Maseda, R. (2013). Institutional change in land planning: Two cases from Galicia. European Planning Studies, 21(8), 1276–1296. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2012). Formal/informal dialectics and the self-transformation of spatial planning systems: An exploration. Administration & Society, 46(6), 654–683. doi: 10.1177/0095399712469194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014). Evolutionary governance theory: An introduction. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam, R., Duineveld, M., & During, R. (2015). Delineating active citizenship: The subjectification of citizens’ initiatives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(2), 163–179. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.918502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwest, F., & van Dam, F. (2010). Van bestrijden naar begeleiden: demografische krimp in Nederland. Den Haag: PBL.
   Google Scholar
• Weck, S., & Beißwenger, S. (2014). Coping with peripheralization: Governance response in two German small cities. European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2156–2171. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.819839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, K., McCreanor, T., Kearns, R., & Ramasubramanian, L. (2001). The impacts of a school closure on neighbourhood social cohesion: Narratives from Invercargill, New Zealand. Health & Place, 7(4), 307–317. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00023-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2010). Rural. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zijderveld, A. C. (2000). The institutional imperative: The interface of institutions and networks. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar