The role of negotiated developer obligations in financing large public infrastructure after the economic crisis in the Netherlands

References

• Alexander, E. R. (2001). Governance and transaction costs in planning systems: A conceptual framework for institutional analysis of land-use planning and development control – the case of Israel. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 755–776. doi: 10.1068/b2759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2014). Land-property markets and planning: A special case. Land Use Policy, 41, 533–540. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. (2009, October 15 and 16). Can the ‘unearned increment’ in land values be harnessed to supply affordable housing? Paper in conference ‘Financing affordable housing and infrastructure in cities: towards innovative land and property taxation system’, UN Habitat GLTN, Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. (2012). Land-use regulations and property values. The ‘windfalls capture’ idea revisited. In N. Brooks, K. Donangy, & G. J. Knapp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on urban economics and planning (pp. 755–786). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. J. (1990). Charges for local infrastructure. Town Planning Review, 61(4), 427–453. doi: 10.3828/tpr.61.4.18m408k45282r107
   Google Scholar
• Barker, K. (2004). Review of housing supply. Delivering stability: Securing our future housing needs (p. 149). London: Barker Review.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2003). Planning by consent. The origins and nature of British development control (213 p.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. (1992). The economics of planning gain: A re-appraisal. Urban Studies, 29(8), 1329–1339. doi: 10.1080/00420989220081311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2010). Window on the Netherlands: Cracks in the myth: Challenges to land policy in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101(3), 349–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Bregman, A. (2016). Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: Trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise. European Planning Studies, 24(7), 1281–1294. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Bregman, A., Van den Broek, L., Evers, D., Galle, M., Meijer, T., & Sorel, N. (2012). Ex-durante evaluatie Wet ruimtelijke ordening: tweede rapportage (p. 126). The Hague: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Bregman, A., Van den Broek, L., Evers, D., Galle, M., Nieuwenhuizen, W., & Sorel, N. (2010). Ex-durante evaluatie Wet ruimtelijke ordening (p. 133). The Hague: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Galle, M., & Sorel, N. (2011). Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law. Environment and Planning A, 43, 928–941. doi: 10.1068/a43400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Segeren, A., & Kronberger, P. (2008). Stedelijke transformatie en grondeigendom (p. 61). Den Haag/Rotterdam: Ruimtelijk Planbureau/Nai uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Sorel, N. (2010). Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. Land Use Policy, 27, 983–989. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, G. (2010). The effects of development impact fees on local fiscal conditions. In G. K. Ingram & Y.-H. Hong (Eds.), Municipal revenues and land policies (pp. 182–212). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• BVH Ruimte bv. (2013). Onderzoek forfaitaire bijdrage Bovenplanse kosten en Bijdrage ruimtelijke ontwikkelingen. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: opdracht van Ministerie BZK en I&M.
   Google Scholar
• BVH Ruimte bv., & Vreman Advies. (2014). Vervolgonderzoek bovenplanse kosten en bijdrage ruimtelijke ontwikkelingen. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: opdracht van Ministerie BZK en I&M.
   Google Scholar
• Callies, D. L., & Grant, M. (1991). Paying for growth and planning gain: An Anglo-American comparison of development conditions, impact fees and development agreements. The Urban Lawyer, 23(2), 221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Ellis, H., Gladwell, C., Henneberry, J., Poxon, J., & Rowley, S. (2001). Planning obligations and the mediation of development ( RICS Foundation Research Papers, 4(3), 44). London: RICS Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Ellis, H., Henneberry, J., & Gladwell, C. (2000). Planning obligations, planning practice, and land-use outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(5), 759–775. doi: 10.1068/b2683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Henneberry, J. (2005). Planning obligations, the market orientation of planning and planning professionalism. Journal of Property Research, 22(1), 37–59. doi: 10.1080/09599910500411036
   Google Scholar
• Corkindale, J. (2004). The land use planning system: Evaluating options for reform ( Hobart Paper 148) (113 p.). London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, T. (2016). Planning obligations policy in England: De facto taxation of development value. In T. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Planning gain. Providing infrastructure & affordable housing (RICS Research) (pp. 63–114). Chichester: WILEY Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, T., & Monk, S. (2011). Planning gains, providing homes. Housing Studies, 26(7–8), 997–1018. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2011.619423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, S. (1998). Planning gain: There must be a better way. Planning Perspectives, 13(4), 357–372. doi: 10.1080/026654398364383
   Google Scholar
• De Bekker. (1977). Amendement op de wijziging van de Onteigeningswet. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal zitting 1976-1977, 13 714, Nr. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2014, October). Monitor gemeente financiën 2014. Special: grond en vastgoed. Utrecht: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. (2006). Valuing planning obligations in England. London: DCLG Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, F. (1997). Infrastructure provision, the negotiating process and the planner’s role. Urban Studies, 34(12), 1935–1954. doi: 10.1080/0042098975150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young & Fakton. (2015). Financiële positie gemeentelijke grondbedrijven. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2015/02/27/rapport-financiele-positie-gemeentelijke-grondbedrijven-actualisatie-2014
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2015). From brown envelopes to community benefits: The co-option of planning gain agreements under deepening neoliberalism. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 67, 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2007). Decent home for all (300 p.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• García-Bellido, J. (1975). Gran Bretaña: Community Land Act 1975. ¿Hacia una socialización del suelo. Ciudad y Territorio, 4/75, 81–94, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Spit, T. (2015). Dilemmas of involvement in land management – comparing an active (Dutch) and passive (German) approach. Land Use Policy, 42, 729–737. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havel, B. (2016). Unlock the lock-in! Balance of rights in relation to betterment and compensation in Poland (21 p.) ( Centre for Land Tenure Studies Working Paper 2/16). Norwegian University of Life Sciences. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2541.8007
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Purdue, M., & Ennis, F. (1996). Negotiating development: Planning gain and mitigating impacts. Journal of Property Research, 13(2), 143–160. doi: 10.1080/09599916.1996.9965062
   Google Scholar
• Hobma, F., Askew, J., Mitschang, S., Santing, J. W., Schwarz, T., Sheppard, A., & Verbist, S. (2014). Internationale vergelijking financiering en kostenverhaal bij organische gebiedsontwikkeling. TU Delft: opdracht van Ministerie I&M.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, G. K., & Hong, Y.-H. (2010). Land value capture: Types and outcomes. In G. K. Ingram & Y.-H. Hong (Eds.), Municipal revenues and land policies (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L. B. (2008). Space for space, a transferable development rights initiative for changing the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan, R. M. (1989). Finance for urban public infrastructure. Urban Studies, 26, 285–300. doi: 10.1080/00420988920080301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. K. (2010). The financial estimates and results of servicing land in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(5), 929–941. doi: 10.1068/b36027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. K. (2017, March 8). Financiele gegevens bouwgrondexploitaties. Financiele gegevens 4e kwartaal bouwgrondexploitatie gemeenten 2016 (1e plaatsing). TU Delft: OTB.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, M. (1981). Planning gain: Law, policy and practice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 61–97. doi: 10.1093/ojls/1.1.61
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie I&M. (2015, November 25). Kamerbrief over Grondbeleid ( IENM/BSK-2015/193853, p. 21). The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, S., & Crook, T. (2016). International experience. In T. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Planning gain. Providing infrastructure & affordable housing (RICS Research) (pp. 227–268). Chichester: WILEY Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, V. (2005). A practical approach to planning law (9th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D. (2010). Capturing value increase in urban redevelopment. Leiden: Sidestone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D. (2013). Vergelijking nota’s bovenwijkse voorzieningen. Grondzaken in de Praktijk, 8(4), 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D. (2014). Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 60–78. doi: 10.1177/0969776412440543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D. (2015). Vergelijking nota’s kostenverhaal bouwplanoverstijgende infrastructuur. Bouwrecht, 107, 722–726.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D., & García Pastor, M. (2016, February). Negotiated developer obligations in Spain. Paper in international conference planning, law and property rights, Bern, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D., Maguregui Salas, I., & Burón Cuadrado, J. (2017). International comparison of the changing dynamics of governance approaches to land development and their results for public value capture. Cities, 71, 123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D., Nijland, H., & Van der Heijden, T. (2016). Openbaarheid en verantwoording onderhandelingsresultaat gebiedsoverstijgende kosten. Tijdschrift Bouwrecht, 79, afl. 10, 534–542.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2010). Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 18(7), 1097–1131. doi: 10.1080/09654311003744191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2006). Planning, law and economics. The rules we make for using land (178 p.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2007). Dutch land-use planning: Planning and managing land-use in the Netherlands, the principles and the practice (299 p.). Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, P. M. (2010). Infrastructure financing and operation in the contemporary city. Geographical Research, 48(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00606.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossowicz, T. (2017, February). Developer obligations in Poland. Example of Wrocław City. Paper in 11th annual conference international academic association planning, law and property rights, Hong Kong (p. 21).
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, M. (2006). The gain from the planning-gain supplement: A consideration of the proposal for a new tax to boost housing supply in the UK. International Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), 101–113. doi: 10.1080/14616710600585757
   Google Scholar
• Parlamentair Documentatie Centrum. University Leiden. Retrieved from https://www.parlement.com/id/vh8lnhronvw9/kabinet_den_uyl_1973_1977
   Google Scholar
• Peddle, M. T., & Lewis, J. L. (1996). Development exactions as growth management and local infrastructure finance tools. Public Works Management & Policy, 1(2), 129–144. doi: 10.1177/1087724X9600100203
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H., & Louw, E. (2003). Changes in Dutch land policy: From monopoly towards competition in the building market. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(3), 369–378. doi: 10.1068/b12982
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. (2014, October 29). Monitor en evaluatierapportage Limburgs Kwaliteitsinstrumentarium 2003–2013. Cluster Ruimte.
   Google Scholar
• Raad van State. (2016). En hoe nu verder! Vierde periodieke beschouwing over interbestuurlijke verhoudingen na de decentralisaties in het sociale en fysieke domein. Den Haag: Afdeling advisering, Raad van State.
   Google Scholar
• Raad voor de financiele verhoudingen. (2015). Grond, geld en gemeenten. De betekenis en gevolgen van de gemeentelijke grondexploitaties voor de bestuurlijke en financiële verhoudingen (52 p.).
   Google Scholar
• Raad voor de leefomgeving en infrastructuur. (2017). Grond voor gebiedsontwikkeling. Instrumenten voor grondbeleid in een energieke samenleving (p. 112).
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J., Stubbs, M., & Shepherd, M. (2002). Urban planning and real estate development (2nd ed.). London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rongen, W. (2017). Public officer Province of Limburg, written questions answered on 10 and 15 November.
   Google Scholar
• Schep, A. W. (2012). Naar evenwichtig bijzonder kostenverhaal door gemeenten (p. 539). Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, M. O. (2013). Implementing value capture in Latin America: Policies and tools for urban development (p. 72). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Sorel, N., Tennekes, J., & Galle, M. (2014). Bekostiging van publieke voorzieningen bij organische gebiedsontwikkeling. The Hague: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
   Google Scholar
• Spaans, M., Golland, A., & Carter, N. (1996). Land supply and housing development: A comparative analysis of Britain and the Netherlands 1970–95. International Planning Studies, 1(3), 291–310. doi: 10.1080/13563479608721659
   Google Scholar
• Van der Krabben, E., & Jacobs, H. M. (2013). Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 774–783. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meulen, T. (2017). Interview on 8 November 2017, 11:50–12:45; written questions answered on 15 November.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meulen, T., & Dieperink, M. (2011). De ruimtelijke kwaliteit van het buitengebied versterkt. Tijdschrift voor Bouwrecht, 7, 618–625.
   Google Scholar
• Verhage, R. (2002). Local policy for housing development, European experiences. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. J. (1998). Public choice, Pigouvian and Coasian planning theory. Urban Studies, 35(1), 53–75. doi: 10.1080/0042098985078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeilmaker, H., & Hagelaars, J. (2016). De eliminatie van de eliminatie. Tijdschrift Bouwrecht, 25.
   Google Scholar