Hegemonic power relations in real practices of spatial planning: the case of Turkey

References

• Albrechts, L. (2003). Planning and power: Towards an emancipatory planning approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(6), 905–924. doi: 10.1068/c29m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2013). The evolution and trajectories of English spatial governance: ‘Neoliberal’ episodes in planning. Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), 6–26. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699223
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, O. (2012). The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey: Unraveling the role of the public sector. Habitat International, 36(1), 26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank, A., & Karadag, R. (2012). The political economy of regional power: Turkey under the AKP. GIGA Working Papers, 204(204), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bank, A., & Karadag, R. (2013). The ‘Ankara Moment’: The politics of Turkey’s regional power in the Middle East, 2007-11. Third World Quarterly, 34(2), 287–304. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.775786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC Euro News. (2013, December 25). Turkey ministers Caglayan, Guler and Bayraktar resign amid scandal. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25514579
   Google Scholar
• Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221–236. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0202100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2005). The nature of difference: Traditions of law and government and their effects on planning in Britain and France. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 259–284). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• CA (Mimarlar Odası Ankara). (2016, January 6). Gökçek Nefret Suçu İşliyor. 43. Donem Basin Aciklamalari. Retrieved from http://www.mimarlarodasiankara.org/index.php?Did=7036
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, N., Hammami, F., Peker, E., Tulumello, S., & Ugur, L. (2016). Differences and connections: Beyond universal theories in planning, urban, and heritage studies. Urban Research & Practice, 9(2), 219–224. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2016.1174418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. (1982). Patronage, power and poverty in southern Italy: A tale of two cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CUP (Sehir Plancilari Odasi). (2011, August 23). 648 nolu Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamenin Değerlendirilmesi. Basin Aciklamasi. Retrieved from http://www.spo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=3260#.WcEmDcgjFPY
   Google Scholar
• CUP (Sehir Plancilari Odasi). (2017, March 17). Gökçek’e çağrimizdir: yeni dava bekleme, bugün git suç duyurusunda bulun. Basin Aciklamasi. Retrieved from http://spoankara.org/haber/gokceke-cagrimizdir-yeni-dava-bekleme-bugun-git-suc-duyurusunda-bulun/
   Google Scholar
• Demirtas-Milz, N. (2013). The regime of informality in neoliberal times in Turkey: The case of the Kadifekale Urban Transformation Project. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 689–714. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. (2008). Framing places: Mediating power in built form (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eraydin, A., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2013). Introduction: Resilience thinking in urban planning. In A. Eraydin & T. Tasan-Kok (Eds.), Resilience thinking in urban planning (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eraydin, A., & Taşan-Kok, T. (2014). State response to contemporary urban movements in Turkey: A critical overview of state entrepreneurialism and authoritarian interventions. Antipode, 46(1), 110–129. doi: 10.1111/anti.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erder, S., & Incioglu, N. (2013. Turkiyède yerel politikanin yukselisi (2nd ed.). Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Universitesi Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Erkip, F. (2003). The shopping mall as an emergent public space in Turkey. Environment and Planning A, 35(6), 1073–1093. doi: 10.1068/a35167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkip, F. (2005). The rise of the shopping mall in Turkey: The use and appeal of a mall in Ankara. Cities (London, England), 22(2), 89–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, M. (2011). Yerelden Ulusal Düzeye Aynılaşan Planlama Anlayışı. In 5.Ulusal yerel Yönetimler Sempozyumu (pp. 13–14). Ankara: Ankara University SBF.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (1991). Promoting economic development urban planning in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57(1), 22–33. doi: 10.1080/01944369108975469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Bringing power to planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(4), 353–366. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0202100401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2001). An instructive case-study hampered by theoretical puzzles: critical comments on Flyvbjerg's rationality and power. International Planning Studies, 6(3), 263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. Vol. 3. (J. D. Faubion, Ed.). London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1989). Planning in the public domain: Discourse and praxis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 8(2), 128–130. doi: 10.1177/0739456X8900800214
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2005). Planning cultures in transition. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 29–44). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. (2003). Passionate planning for the others’ desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning. Progress in Planning, 60(3), 235–319. doi: 10.1016/S0305-9006(02)00115-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. doi: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143. doi: 10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23, 217–234. doi: 10.1068/b230217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Hong Kong: UBc Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helvacioglu, B. (2000). Globalization in the neighborhood. International Sociology, 15(2), 326–342. doi: 10.1177/0268580900015002011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 333–342. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–189. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9501400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyder, C., & Oncu, A. (1994). Globalization of a Third-World Metropolis: Istanbul in the 1980s. Review, 17(3), 383–421.
   Google Scholar
• Kilinc, G., Ozgur, H., & Genc, F. N. (2009). Ethics for the prevention of corruption in Turkey: Academic research report on planning ethics at local level. Council of Ethics for the Public Service. Ankara: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Planning culture – a concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2133–2147. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1018404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kompil, M., & Celik, H. M. (2009). Turkiye’de Bati Tarzi Buyuk Olcekli Tuketim Mekanlarinin Gelisimi ve Kentsel Perakende Alanlarinin Yasal ve Yapısal Olarak Düzenlenmesi Gayretleri. Megaron, 4(2), 90–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T., & Ünsal, Ö. (2010). ‘Urban transformation’ as state-led property transfer: An analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1479–1499. doi: 10.1177/0042098009353629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, C. (2006). The art of city making. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Low, N. (1991). Planning, politics and the state: Political foundations of planning thought. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. (1938). The culture of cities. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (1994). Planning in Turkey. Habitat International, 18(4), 99–116. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(94)90020-5
   Google Scholar
• Oncu, A. (1988). The politics of the urban land market in Turkey: 1950-1980. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(1), 38–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1988.tb00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F. (2010). Spatial planning as expression of culturised planning practices: The examples of Helsinki, Finland and Athens, Greece. Town Planning Review, 81(1), 83–110. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2009.25
   Google Scholar
• Ozuduru, B., Varol, C., & Ercoskun, O. Y. (2014). Do shopping centers abate the resilience of shopping streets? The co-existence of both shopping venues in Ankara, Turkey. Cities, 36, 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Penbecioglu, M., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2016). Alienated and politicized? Young planners’ confrontation with entrepreneurial and authoritarian state intervention in urban development in Turkey. European Planning Studies, 24(6), 1037–1055. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1135233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radikal News. (2004, February 24). Melih Gökçek’in rüküş hayalleri. Retrieved from http://www.radikal.com.tr/politika/melih-gokcekin-rukus-hayalleri-701786/
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009). Strangely familiar: Planning and the worlds of insurgence and informality. Planning Theory, 8(1), 7–11. doi: 10.1177/1473095208099294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1998). The death of modernist planning: Radical praxis for a postmodern age. In M. Douglass & J. Friedmann (Eds.), Cities for citizens (pp. 163–184). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (2005). Hybrid planning cultures: The search for the global cultural commons. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 3–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Segmen, L. (2009, March 26). 500 bin esege bedel esek heykeli [The donkey status that is worth 500 thousand donkeys]. Hürriyet News. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/500-bin-esege-bedel-esekli-hoca-heykeli-11290394
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(1), 63–76. doi: 10.1068/d9s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. (2003). New commercial property investment methods in the course of financial deregulation. QPE-Revista Electronica, 5, 50–70.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., Bertolini, L., Oliveira e Costa, S., Lothan, H., Carvalho, H., Desmet, M., … Zoete, J. A. (2016). ‘Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee’: Giving voice to planning practitioners. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), 621–651. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1225711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002). Personal dynamics, distinctive frames and communicative planning. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 65–92). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Allmendinger, P. (1998). Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(11), 1975–1989. doi: 10.1068/a301975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokatli, N., & Boyaci, Y. (1998). The changing retail industry and retail landscapes. Cities, 15(5), 345–359. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00030-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokatli, N., & Boyaci, Y. (1999). The changing morphology of commercial activity in Istanbul. Cities (london, England), 16(3), 181–193. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulumello, S. (2015). Questioning the universality of institutional transformation theories in spatial planning: Shopping mall developments in Palermo. International Planning Studies, 20(4), 371–389. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2015.1029693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok, I. (1992). Property-led urban regeneration: Panacea or placebo?. Environment and Planning A, 24(3), 361–379. doi: 10.1068/a240361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun, N. (2007). Globalization and urban governance in Istanbul. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22, 127–138. doi: 10.1007/s10901-006-9069-y
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode, 34(3), 519–540. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (1998). Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4), 395–406. doi: 10.1177/088541229801200401
   Google Scholar