Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views

References

• Acs, Z., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., & Lundvall, B.-A. (2001). The globalizing learning economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Eds.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–625). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011b). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Gertler, S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2017). Introduction: Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation and development dynamics. Economic Geography, 93(5), 429–435. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim B. T., Moodysson J., & Tödtling F. (2011a). Constructing regional advantage: Towards state-of-the-art regional innovation system policies in Europe? European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1133–1139. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.573127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2011). Avoiding environmental convergence: A possible role for sustainability experiments in latecomer countries? International Journal of Institutions and Economies, 3(2), 367–385.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems – a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process” of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 187–197). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Vale, M. (2018). Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 18.01, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2008). Regional innovation systems, clean technology & Jacobian cluster-platform policies. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1(1), 23–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012a). Transversality and transition: Green innovation and new regional path creation. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 817–834. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012b). Relatedness, transversality and public policy in innovative regions. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1889–1907. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2013). Global production networks and global innovation networks: Stability versus growth. European Planning Studies, 21(7), 1081–1094. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.733854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C., MacNeill, S., & Collinge, C. (2010). Platforms of innovation: Dynamics of new industrial knowledge flows. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalised world (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crevoisier, O., & Jeannerat, H. (2009). Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies, 17, 1223–1241. doi: 10.1080/09654310902978231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P. (2015). Global shift, mapping the changing contours of the world economy (7th ed.). London: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 221–238). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches − their emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations (pp. 1–35). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research Policy, 41(10), 1757–1769. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS3). Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). HORIZON 2020 – excellent science, competitive industries, better society, The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. (2007). Perspectives on entrepreneurship and cluster formation: Biotechnology in the US capitol region. In K. Polenske (Ed.), The economic geography of innovation (pp. 241–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialization: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foxon, T. J. (2007). Technological lock-in and the role of innovation. In G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable development (pp. 610–624). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., … Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45, 896–913. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20, 521–536. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 90–107. doi: 10.1016/j.eist2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., Geels, F. W., & McMeekin, A. (2017). Reconfiguring urban sustainability transitions, analysing multiplicity. Sustainability, 9(2), 299. doi: 10.3390/su9020299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommels, A., Peters, P., & Bijker, W. E. (2007). Techno therapy or nurtured niches? Technology studies and the evaluation of radical innovations. Research Policy, 36(7), 1088–1099. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems – theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 221–238). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodriguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerat, H., & Crevoisier, O. (2016). Editorial: From ‘territorial innovation models’ to ‘territorial knowledge dynamics’: On the learning value of a new concept in regional studies. Regional Studies, 50, 185–188. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1105653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebir, L., Crevoisier, O., Costa, P., & Peyrache-Gadeau, V. (2017). Sustainable innovation and regional development – rethinking innovative milieus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. (2000). High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. (1994). Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability: The problem of technological regime shifts. Futures, 26(10), 1023–1046. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Never, B. (2017). Green transition, industrial policy, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 66–84. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grw037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45, 205–217. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Menzel, M., Karlsen, A., Sommer, P., … Normann, H. (2018). Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning, doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1995). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, A., Antonelli, P., & Pozzi, C. (2017). Emerging green-tech specializations and clusters – a network analysis on technological innovation at the metropolitan level. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 1037–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. (2015). Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 432–450. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking private vs public sector myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., & Semieniuk, G. (2017). Public financing of innovation: New questions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 24–48. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grw036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2017). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35(4), 569–583. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16645106
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). The innovation policy mix. In OECD (Ed.), OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2010 (pp. 251–279). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). System innovation: Synthesis report. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N., Atienza, M., & Arias, M. (2017). An invitation to the dark side of economic geography. Environment and Planning A, 50(1), 236–244. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17739007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2008). On competition (11th updated and expanded ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, H., Acs, Z., & Stought, R. (2013). Regional systems of entrepreneurship: The nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 559–587. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Schot, J., & Berkhout, F. (2012). Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 10, 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.eist2012.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguéz-Pose, A. (2018). Commentary: The revenge of places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2014). Green industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 469–491. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/gru025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 169–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. (1973). Economics (9th ed.). Tokyo: McGrawHill Kogakusha.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. L. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlaile, M., Urmetzer, S., Blok, V., Andersen, A. D., Timmermans, J., Mueller, M., … Pyka, A. (2017). Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustainability, 9(2), 2253. doi: 10.3390/su9122253
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmüller, E. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change. Working Paper, Science and Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1911). The theory of economic development. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process (Vol. 1). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41, 1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Local demonstrations for global transitions – dynamics across governance levels fostering socio-technical regime change towards sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 461–479. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. U.S.E. Discussion Paper Series, No. 16-13, Utrecht School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1843–1866. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., & Koll, F. (2017). Platforming for path-breaking? The case of regional electromobility initiatives in Germany. In J. Glückler, E. Lazega, & I. Hammer (Eds.), Knowledge and networks (pp. 191–219). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90(4), 403–427. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2016). The emergence of new technology-based industries: The case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(3), 611–635. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Asheim, B., & Boschma, R. (2013). Knowledge sourcing, innovation and constructing advantage in regions of Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 161–169. doi: 10.1177/0969776412457173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Auer, A. (2017). Knowledge bases, innovation and multi-scalar relationships – which kind of territorial boundedness of industrial clusters? SRE-DISC.2017/08, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1741–1758. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Höglinger, C., Sinozic, T., & Auer, A. (2014). Factors for the emergence and growth of environmental technology industries in Upper Austria. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 15(6), 115–140. doi: 10.1553/moegg156s115
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2011). Regional innovation systems. In P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 455–466). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Reframing regional development (pp. 297–317). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2017). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change. Progress in Human Geography. doi: 10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2012). Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 46(2), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
   Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., Murphy, J., & Raven, R. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. (2002). Escaping carbon lock in. Energy Policy, 30, 317–325. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. (2010). What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(1), 115–137. doi: 10.1007/s00191-009-0135-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallance, P. (2016). Universities, public research, and evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography, 92(4), 355–377. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1146076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. (2011). Towards responsible research & innovation in the ICT & security technologies fields. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Warnke, P., Koschatzky, K., Dönitz, E., Zenker, A., Stahlecker, T., Som, O., … Güth, S. (2016). Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 49, Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., & Truffer, B. (2017). Moving innovation systems research to the next level: Towards an integrative agenda. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 101–121. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grx002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolthuis, R., Lankuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25, 609–619. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H., & Coe, N. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29–58. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar