Delivering a national spatial development strategy: a success story?

References

• Adams, N., Cotella, G., & Nunes, R. (Eds.). 2012. Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning: Building on EU enlargement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2012). Evaluating planning. What is successful planning and (how) can we measure it? In A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee, & J. Woltjer (Eds.), Evaluation for participation and sustainability in planning (pp. 32–46). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R., & Faludi, A. (1989). Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16(2), 127–140. doi: 10.1068/b160127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., Duineveld, M., & Van Asche, K. (2016). Evolutionary governance theory and the adaptive capacity of the Dutch planning system. In L. Boelens & G. de Roo (Eds.), Spatial planning in a complex unpredictable world of change (pp. 97–121). Groningen: Inplanning. doi: 10.17418/B.2016.9789491937279.4
   Google Scholar
• Blagajne, D. & Šantej, B. (2001). Študija izvajanja prostorske zakonodaje o urejanju naselij, stavbnih zemljišč in graditve objektov. Ljubljana: Inštitut za pravo okolja.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. (2010). Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational-approach in planning. Planning Theory, 9(1), 28–62. doi: 10.1177/1473095209346499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, L., & de Roo, G. (2016). Planning of undefined becoming: First encounters of planners beyond the plan. Planning Theory, 15(1), 42–67. doi: 10.1177/1473095214542631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Cavallini, S., Soldi, R., Friedl, J., & Volpe, M. (2016). Using the quadruple helix approach to accelerate the transfer of research and innovation results to regional growth. Brussels: EU Committee of the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M. (2012). Shallow or deep Europeanisation? The uneven impact of EU cohesion policy on the regional and local authorities in Poland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 730–745. doi: 10.1068/c1164r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, J., & Zuidema, C. (2016). Integrated energy landscapes – How coevolution encourages planners to focus on developing linkages between renewable energy systems and local landscapes. In L. Boelens & G. de Roo (Eds.), Spatial planning in a complex unpredictable world of change (pp. 169–188). Groningen: Inplanning. doi: 10.17418/B.2016.9789491937279.7
   Google Scholar
• Duehr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2012). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1989). Conformance vs. performance: Implications for evaluation. Impact Assessment, 7(2–3), 135–151. doi: 10.1080/07349165.1989.9726017
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research, 15, 299–318. doi: 10.1080/713691907
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2014). Europeanisation or Europeanisation of spatial planning? Planning Theory and Practice, 15(2), 155–169. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2014.902095
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D. (2012). Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: The case of national planning policy in Denmark. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1359–1392. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.680584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbec, F. (2003). (Z)mešani občutki in ocene. Pravna Praksa, 22(3), 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Getimis, P. (2012). Comparing spatial planning systems and planning cultures in Europe. The need for a multi-scalar approach. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
   Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, G. (2011). Europeanization, actor constellations and spatial policy change in Greece. disP, 47(3), 32–41. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2011.10557142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, G. (2012). The Europeanization of national planning: Explaining the causes and the potentials of change. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 117–135. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661195
   Google Scholar
• Golobič, M., Marot, N., Bantan, M., Hočevar, I., & Hudoklin, J. (2014). SPRS2030 – Analiza izvajanja v strategiji prostorskega razvoja Slovenije predvidenih programov in ukrepov [SPRS 2030 – Analysis of implementation of the Strategy of the Spatial Development of Slovenia. Final report]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). A frame in the fields: Policymaking and the reinvention of politics. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 88–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1999). Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(2), 111–121. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9901900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2009). In search of the ‘strategic’ in spatial strategy making. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 439–457. doi: 10.1080/14649350903417191
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2013). Circuits of knowledge and techniques: The transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1510–1526. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A. M., Gennaio Franscini, M. P., & Kübler, D. (2014). Actors, decisions and policy changes in local urbanization. European Planning Studies, 22, 1301–1319. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.783557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2004). Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 471–480. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 557–584. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Self-Government Act. (2007). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 94, 12729–12745.
   Google Scholar
• Long, N. (2015). Activities, actants and actors: Theoretical perspectives on development practice and practitioners. In P. Milone, F. Ventura, & J. Ye (Eds.), Constructing a new framework for rural development (pp. 31–58). Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, K. (2012). Europeanization and changing planning in east-central Europe: An easterner’s view. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 137–154. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661596
   Google Scholar
• Marot, N. (2010). An assessment of the role spatial planning legislation in the Slovenian spatial planning system. Ljubljana: Faculty of Civic and Geodetic Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Marot, N. (2011). New planning jurisdictions, scant resources and local public responsibility: Delivering spatial planning in Slovenia. In N. Adams, G. Cotella, & R. Nunes (Eds.), Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning. Knowledge and policy development in an enlarged EU (pp. 178–204). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H., Tempels, B., Crabbé, A., & Boelens, L. (2016). Shifting public-private responsibilities in Flemish flood risk management. Towards a co-evolutionary approach. Land Use Policy, 57, 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. (2013). Placing the stakes: The enactment of territorial stakeholders in planning processes. Environment and Planning A, 45, 781–796. doi: 10.1068/a45116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment and Local Government. (2002). National spatial strategy for Ireland 2002–2020. People, places and potential. Dublin: Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (2011). Summary national policy strategy for infrastructure and spatial planning. The Hague: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning (2004). Spatial development strategy of the republic of Slovenia. Ljubljana: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni, S. (2010). Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory, 9(2), 137–155. doi: 10.1177/1473095209357868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munteanu, M., & Servillo, L. (2013). Romanian spatial planning system: Post-communist dynamics of change and Europeanization processes. European Planning Studies 22(11). doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.830696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2014). The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning. Planning Theory, 13(3), 288–303. doi: 10.1177/1473095213499340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K., & Richardson, T. (2012). Strategic spatial planning in transition: Contested rationalities and spatial logics in 21st century Danish spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 20(10), 1689–1707. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010). Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), 343–361. doi: 10.1177/0885412210364589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parysek, J. J. (2009). Urban development in Poland after 2003: Legal regulations and reality. Quaestiones Geographicae, 28(1), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34, 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogačnik, A. (2007). New approach to spatial planning in Slovenia: (Does the new law provide an opportunity for more dynamic and more people-friendly spatial development). Urbani Izziv, 18(1/2), 118–121.
   Google Scholar
• Prebilič, V., & Bačlija, I. (2013). Dynamics of administrative capacity in Slovenian municipal administrations. Lex Localis, 11(3), 545–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raagmaa, G., & Stead, D. (2014). Spatial planning in the Baltic States: Impacts of European policies. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 671–679. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravbar, M., & Bole, D. (2003). Sistem urejanja prostora. Zaključno poročilo. Ljubljana: Geografski inštitut Antona Melika.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., & Blotevogel, H. H. (2012). Comparing spatial planning practice in Europe: A plea for cultural sensitization. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659517
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2010). Actor-network theory and planning theory: A response to Boelens. Planning Theory, 9(3), 265–268. doi: 10.1177/1473095210368772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36, 43–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1014301607592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2010). Across the pond, a 180-degrees turn. A new government and new planning policies in the UK raise questions about the future. Planning – Chicago, 76(10), 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., & Lingua, V. (2014). The innovation of the Italian planning system: Actors, path dependencies, cultural contradictions and a missing epilogue. European Planning Studies, 22, 400–417. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.752443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., & Lord, A. (2007). The cultural turn? Culture change and what it means for spatial planning in England. Planning Practice & Research, 22, 63–78. doi: 10.1080/02697450601173538
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfling, J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Spatial Planning Act. (2003). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 110, 13057–13083.
   Google Scholar
• Spatial Planning Act. (2007). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 33, 4585–4602.
   Google Scholar
• Staniunas, E. (2009). Remarks on the features of Lithuanian planning culture. In J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), International symposium planning cultures in Europe (pp. 139–151). Hamburg: Hafen City Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Cotella, G. (2011). Differential Europe: Domestic actors and their role in shaping spatial planning systems. disP, 47(3), 13–21. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2011.10557140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996). After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2), 79–91. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9601600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1997). Success, failure, and conformance: An alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(4), 573–587. doi: 10.1068/b240573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terryn, E., Boelens, L., & Pisman, A. (2016). Beyond the divide: Evaluation in co-evolutionary spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 24(6), 1079–1097. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1154019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tölle, A. (2013). National planning systems between convergence and incongruity: Implications for cross-border cooperation from the German-polish perspective. European Planning Studies, 21(4), 615–630. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Mourato, J., & Böhme, K. (2007). The impact of Europeanization on planning cultures. In J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), International symposium planning cultures in Europe (pp. 239–255). Hamburg: Hafen City Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013). Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An exploration. Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), 141–159. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699261
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J. (2007). Is spatial planning a driver for sustainable development in Poland? Planning Practice & Research, 22(3), 463–471. doi: 10.1080/02697450701688468
   Google Scholar
• Zavodnik Lamovšek, A. (2003). Prostorsko planiranje na poti k sistemski ureditvi. Urbani Izziv, 14(1), 15–20. doi: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-2003-14-01-003
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W. (2005). In search of conceptual modernization: The new Dutch ‘national spatial strategy’. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20, 425–443. doi: 10.1007/s10901-005-9024-3
   Google Scholar