The resurgence of regional design

References

• Alaily-Mattar, N., Thierstein, A., & Förster, A. (2014). Alternative futures: A methodology for integrated sustainability considerations, the case of Nuremberg West, Germany. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 19(6), 677–701. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2013.841135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawadi, K., & Benkraouda, O. (2017). What happened to Abu Dhabi’s urbanism? The question of regional integration. Journal of Urban Design. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2017.1361786
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (1999). Planners as catalysts and initiators of change. The new structure plan for Flanders. European Planning Studies, 7(5), 587–603. doi: 10.1080/09654319908720540
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Balducci, A., & Hillier, J. (2016). Situated practices of strategic planning: An international perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balz, V., & Zonneveld, W. (2015). Regional design in the context of fragmented territorial governance: South Wing studio. European Planning Studies, 23(5), 871–891. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.889662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisker, J., Chester, A. & Eisenberg, T. (Eds.) (2015). Rebuild by design. Retrieved from http://www.rebuildbydesign.org/data/files/499.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burger, J., O’Neill, K. M., Handel, S. N., Hensold, B., & Ford, G. (2017). The shore is wider than the beach: Ecological planning solutions to sea level rise for the Jersey Shore, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 512–522. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Urban Policy Research. (1992). Impact assessment of the New Jersey Interim State Development and Redevelopment Plan. Trenton: NJ State Planning Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G., & Janin Rivolin, U. (2011). Europeanization of spatial planning through discourse and practice in Italy. disP – The Planning Review, 47(186), 42–53. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2011.10557143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, J. A., & Ten Heuvelhof, E. F. (1999). Scientific expertise in complex decision-making processes. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 179–184. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782428
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, J. (2009). Landscape architecture between politics and science: An integrative perspective on landscape planning and design in the network society. Wageningen: Blauwdruk/Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Roo, G., & Porter, G. (2016). Fuzzy planning: The role of actors in a fuzzy governance environment (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, G. (1991). L’Urbanisme des réseaux: Théories et méthodes. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2007). The visual language of planning: Exploring cartographic representations for spatial planning in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., & Zonneveld, W. (2012). Images of Europe, images for Europe. In W. Zonneveld, J. de Vries, & L. Janssen-Jansen (Eds.), European territorial governance (pp. 281–308). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1996). Framing with images. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1068/b230093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2003a). Unfinished business: European spatial planning in the 2000s. Town Planning Review, 74(1), 121–140. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2003b). The application of the European spatial development perspective. Town Planning Review, 74(1), 1–9. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2013). Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: A critical review. Environment and Planning A, 45(6), 1302–1317. doi: 10.1068/a45299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Van der Valk, A. (1994). Rule and order: Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. & Waterhout, B (2002). The making of the European spatial development perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández de los Ríos, Á. (1868). El futuro Madrid: Paseos mentales por la capital de España, tal cual es y tal cual debe dejarla transformada la revolución. Madrid: Biblioteca Universal Económica. [Republished 1989, with a forward by Antonio Bonet Correa].
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J., & Weaver, C. (1980). Territory and function: The evolution of regional planning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (2010). Authoritative governance: Policy making in the age of mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). Performing governance through networks. European Political Science, 4(3), 340–347. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210034
   Google Scholar
• Hegemann, W. & Peets, E. (1922). The American Vitruvius: An architects’ handbook of civic art. New York, NY: Architectural Book Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (1898). To-morrow: A peaceful path to real reform. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., Gruber, J., Neuman, M., & Thompson, R. (1994). Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building. Report to the California Policy Seminar, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Kelbaugh, D. (1997). Common place: Toward neighborhood and regional design. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, M. (2006). The emergence of urban design in regional and metropolitan planning: The Australian context. Australian Planner, 43(1), 36–41. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2006.9982463
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Knox, P. (2009). The new metropolis: Rethinking megalopolis. Regional Studies, 43(6), 789–802. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. (1996). Tomorrow by design: A regional design process for sustainability. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1976). Managing the sense of a region. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKaye, B. (1921). An Appalachian trail: A project in regional planning. Journal of the American Institute of Architects, 9, 325–330.
   Google Scholar
• McHarg, I. (1969). Design with nature. New York, NY: Doubleday/Natural History Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H., Bobbink, I., & Nijhuis, S. (2010). Delta urbanism: The Netherlands. Chicago: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. & MacKaye, B. (1931, July). The townless highway. The Nation, p. 163.
   Google Scholar
• National Infrastructure Commission. (2017a). The Cambridge to Oxford connection: Ideas competition. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Infrastructure Commission. (2017b). Partnering for prosperity: A new deal fort the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford Arc. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (1996). Images as institution builders: Metropolitan planning in Madrid. European Planning Studies, 4(3), 293–312. doi: 10.1080/09654319608720347
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2000). Regional design: Recovering a great landscape architecture and urban planning tradition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47, 115–128. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11–26. doi: 10.1177/0739456X04270466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2007). Multi-scalar large institutional networks in regional planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 8(3), 319–344. doi: 10.1080/14649350701514645
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2011). Centenary paper: Ildefons Cerdà and the future of spatial planning: The network urbanism of a city planning pioneer. Town Planning Review, 82(2), 117–144. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.10
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2014). Rethinking borders. In W. Steele, T. Alizadeh, & L. Eslami-Andargoli (Eds.), Planning across borders (pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2016). Teaching collaborative and interdisciplinary service-based urban design and planning studios. Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), 596–615. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1100962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M., & Hull, A. (2011). The futures of the city region. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Office of State Planning. (1990). The regional design system. Trenton: Author.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey State Planning Commission. (1992). Communities of place: The New Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan. Trenton: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, K., & Albrechts, L. (2017). Changing planning discourses and practice: The Flanders Structure Plan; Kristian Olesen in conversation with Louis Albrechts. AESOP Young Academics Booklet Series C: Exploring Place matters in Planning, Booklet 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ovink, H. (2015). Reform by design. Journal of Extreme Events, 2(1), 7–14. doi: 10.1142/S2345737615020017
   Google Scholar
• Regional Plan Association. (1929). Regional plan for New York and environs. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Plan Association. (2017). The fourth regional plan: Making the region work for all of us. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Planning Association of America. (1925, May). Survey Graphic 7, entire issue.
   Google Scholar
• Ryser, J., & Franchini, T. (2015). International manual of planning practice. The Hague: International Society of City and Regional Planners ISOCARP.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W., & Faludi, A. (2000). Three approaches to strategic spatial planning. In W. Salet & A. Faludi (Eds.), The revival of strategic spatial planning (pp. 267–280). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Salewski, C. (2012). Dutch new worlds: Scenarios in physical planning and design in the Netherlands, 1970-2000. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sijmons, D., Hugtenburg, J., Feddes, F., & Van Hoorn, A. (2014). Landscape and energy: Designing transition. Rotterdam: nai010 publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Spirn, A. W. (2000). Ian McHarg, landscape architecture, and environmentalism: Ideas and methods in context, in Michel Conan. Environmentalism in landscape architecture. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2014). European integration and spatial rescaling in the Baltic region: Soft spaces, soft planning and soft security. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 680–693. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (1996). Planning as persuasive storytelling: The rhetorical construction of Chicago's electric future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (2003). Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships. Planning Theory, 2(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1177/14730952030022003
   Google Scholar
• Van de Riet, O. A. W. T. (2003). Policy analysis in a multi-actor policy settings: Navigating between negotiated nonsense & superfluous knowledge. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, J. (1997). The spatial development perspective for the Benelux. Built Environment, 23(1), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. T. (2015). Future directions in urban design as public policy: Reassessing best practice principles for design review and development management. Journal of Urban Design, 20(3), 325–348. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1031212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaro, R., & Hiss, T. (1996). A region at risk. New York, NY: Regional Plan Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W. (2005a). Expansive spatial planning: The new European transnational spatial visions. European Planning Studies, 13(1), 137–155. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000312442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W. (2005b). Multiple visioning: New ways of constructing transnational spatial visions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(1), 41–62. doi: 10.1068/c37m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar