Evolution of knowledge bases in European regions: searching for spatial regularities and links with innovation performance

References

• Aslesen, H. W., & Freel, M. (2012). Industrial knowledge bases as drivers of open innovation? Industry and Innovation, 19(7), 563–584. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.726807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 291–317. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Coenen, L., & Vang, J. (2007). Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(5), 655–670. doi: 10.1068/c0648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Hansen, H. G. (2009). Knowledge bases, talents and contexts: On the usefulness of creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography, 85, 425–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01051.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45, 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Grillistch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past–presence–future. In D. Doloreux, R. Shearmur, & C. Carrincazeaux (Eds.), Handbook on the geography of innovation (pp. 45–62). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J. (2016). Towards a typology of repositioning strategies of GVC/GPN suppliers: The case of functional upgrading and downgrading. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(4), 849–869. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., & Csank, P. (2016). Can emerging regional innovation strategies in less developed European regions bridge the main gaps in the innovation process? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34: 1095–1114. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15601680
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., & Kadlec, V. (2018). Knowledge bases, R&D structure and Socio-economic and Innovation Performance of European Regions. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). A concise history of the knowledge base literature: Challenging questions for future research. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1721, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Balland, P., & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24 (1), 223–250. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtu012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C. (2011). Are knowledge bases enough? A comparative study of the geography of knowledge sources in China (Great Beijing) and India (Pune), European Planning Studies, 19 (7), 1357–1373. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.573171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvad Business School, p. 228.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, XXIV, 1120–1171.
   Google Scholar
• Eynatten, H., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Egozcue, J. (2002). Understanding perturbation on the simplex: A simple method to better visualize and interpret compositional data in ternary diagrams. Mathematical Geology, 34 (3), 249–257. doi: 10.1023/A:1014826205533
   Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Timmermans, B. (2017). Knowledge bases and relatedness. A study of labour mobility in Norwegian regions. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, no. 7.16, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 75–99. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2008). Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context. In A. Amin, & J. Roberts (Eds.), Community, economic creativity, and organization (pp. 203–226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., & Stark, D. (1997). Organizing diversity: Evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism. Regional Studies, 31, 533–544. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, D., & Midgley, N. (2000). Graphical representation of particle shape using triangular diagrams: An excel spreadsheet method. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 25, 1473–1477. doi:10.1002/1096-9837(200012)25:13<1473::AID-ESP158>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Martin, R., & Srholec, M. (2016). Knowledge base combinations and innovation performance in Swedish regions. Economic Geography. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2014). Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2305–2325. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.835793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Innovation policies and new regional growth paths: A place-based system failure framework. Papers in Innovation Studies, No. 2016/26, CIRCLE, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Tödtling, F., & Höglinger, C. (2015). Variety in knowledge sourcing, geography and innovation: Evidence from the ICT sector in Austria. Papers in Regional Science, 94 (1), 25–43. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink R., Plum O., & Rickmers, A., (2014). On the implications of knowledge bases for regional innovation policies in Germany. Quaestiones Geographicae, 33 (4), 7–16. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań. doi:10.2478/quageo-2014–0045, ISSN 0137–477X doi: 10.2478/quageo-2014-0045
   Google Scholar
• Herstad, S., Aslesen, H. W., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Research Policy, 43, 495–504. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2011). Organisational learning, supportive innovation systems and implications for policy formulation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 453–462. doi: 10.1007/s13132-011-0063-6
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., Innocenti, N., & Capone, F. (2017). The impact of related variety on the creative employment growth. The Annals of Regional Science, 58, 491–512. doi: 10.1007/s00168-016-0805-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992). Introduction. In B. A. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation (pp. 1–19). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A. (1996). Industrial geography: Agglomeration and local milieu. Progress in Human Geography, 20, 392–403. doi: 10.1177/030913259602000307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2012). Measuring knowledge bases in Swedish regions. European Planning Studies, 20, 1569–1582. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.708022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2011). Innovation in symbolic industries: The geography and organization of knowledge sourcing. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1183–1203. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.573131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. doi: 10.1177/0969776411427326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Moodysson, J., & Zukauskaite, E. (2011). Regional innovation policy beyond ‘best practice’: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 550–568. doi: 10.1007/s13132-011-0067-2
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Trippl, M. (2014). System failures, knowledge bases and regional innovation policies. disP – The Planning Review, 50(1), 24–32. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2014.926722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manniche, J. (2012). Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: On the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge bases model. European Planning Studies, 20 (11), 1823–1841. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2013). Path dependence and the state. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development (pp. 318–340). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, V., & Netrdová, P. (2014). Measuring spatial aspects of variability. Comparing spatial autocorrelation with regional decomposition in international unemployment research. Historical Social Research, 39(2), 292–314. doi: 10.12759/hsr.39.2014.2.292-314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotný, J., Blažek, J., & Květoň, V. (2016). The anatomy of difference: Comprehending the evolutionary dynamics of economic and spatial structure in the Austrian and Czech economies. European Planning Studies, 24, 788–808. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1139060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, P. (2018). Global production networks, foreign direct investment, and supplier linkages in the integrated peripheries of the automotive industry. Economic Geography, 141–165. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1393313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plum, O., & Hassink, R. (2011). On the nature and geography of innovation and interactive learning: A case study of the biotechnology industry in the Aachen technology region, Germany. European Planning Studies, 19, 1141–1163. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.573128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plum, O., & Hassink, R. (2013). Analysing the knowledge base configuration that drives southwest Saxony’s automotive firms. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20, 206–226. doi: 10.1177/0969776412454127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. L. (2015). Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 49, 1922–1937. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.854878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedita, S. R., Noni, I., Apa, R., & Orsi, L. (2017). Measuring how the knowledge space shapes the technological progress of European regions. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography series, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Sedita, S., De Noni, I., & Pilotti, L. (2017). Out of the crisis: An empirical investigation of place-specific determinants of economic resilience. European Planning Studies, 25(2), 155–180. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1261804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlens, J. (2003). A tutorial on Principal Component Analysis – derivation, discussion and singular value decomposition. Retrieved from https://www.cs.princeton.edu/picasso/mats/PCA-Tutorial-Intuition_jp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spurná, P. (2008). Spatial autocorrelation – a pervasive phenomenon in the analysis of spatial data? Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 44 (4), 767–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20, 1843–1866. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34 (8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1741–1758. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallance, P., Blažek, J., Edwards, J., & Květoň, V. (2018). Smart specialisation in regions with less-developed research and innovation systems: A changing role for universities? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 219–238. doi: 10.1177/2399654417705137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar