407
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Innovation platforms as a solution to the proximity paradox

&
Pages 1312-1329 | Received 11 Sep 2017, Accepted 09 May 2018, Published online: 20 May 2018

References

  • Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2016). City-as-a-Platform: The rise of participatory innovation platforms in Finnish cities. Sustainability, 8. doi:10.3390/su8090922 pages 1–31
  • Balland, P.-A. (2012). Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) industry. Regional Studies, 46(6), 741–756. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.529121
  • Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
  • Balland, P.-A., De Vaan, M., & Boschma, R. (2013). The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007. Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 741–765. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs023
  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
  • Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310–319. doi: 10.1108/14691930110400128
  • Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467–476. doi: 10.1108/01437730210449357
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., & de Vaan, M. (2014). The formation of economic networks: A proximity approach. In A. Torre & F. Wallet (Eds.), Regional development and proximity relations (pp. 243–266). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In R. A. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–135). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 409–433. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr010
  • Cassi, L., & Plunket, A. (2014). Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: In search of the proximity paradox. The Annals of Regional Science, 53, 395–422. doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0612-6
  • Consoli, D., & Patrucco, P. P. (2008). Innovation platforms and the governance of knowledge: Evidence from Italy and the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17, 701–718. doi: 10.1080/10438590701785694
  • Cooke, P. (2012). From clusters to platform policies in regional development. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1415–1424. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.680741
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Demers, C. (2007). Organizational change theories: A synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Gertler, M. S. (1995). Being there – proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography, 71, 1–26. doi: 10.2307/144433
  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., & Buckley, M. R. (2003). Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 433–454. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00046-8
  • Hannon, J. M. (1997). Leveraging HRM to enrich competitive intelligence. Human Resource Management, 36, 409–422. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199724)36:4<409::AID-HRM5>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • Hargadon, A. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41–85. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24003-4
  • Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749. doi: 10.2307/2393655
  • Harmaakorpi, V. (2006). The regional development method as a tool for regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 14, 1085–1104. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852399
  • Harmaakorpi, V., & Melkas, H. (2012). Epilogue. In H. Melkas & V. Harmaakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications (pp. 437–452). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Harmaakorpi, V., Melkas, H., & Uotila, T. (2017). Re-categorizing innovation policy according to broad-based innovation. European Planning Studies, 25(9), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1327035
  • Harmaakorpi, V., Tura, T., & Artima, E. (2006, June). Balancing regional innovation policy between proximity and distance. Paper presented at the fifth proximity congress, Bordeaux, France.
  • Harmaakorpi, V., Tura, T., & Melkas, H. (2011). Regional innovation platforms. In P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), The handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 556–572). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Hyypiä, M. (2013). Roles of leadership in complex environments: Enhancing Knowledge Flows in Organisational Constellations through Practice-Based Innovation Processes. Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 546. Lappeenranta: Yliopistopaino.
  • Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2, 337–359. doi: 10.1177/1534484303257985
  • Johansson, F. (2004). The Medici effect: Breakthrough insights at the intersection of ideas, concepts and cultures. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Kilelu, C., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems, 118, 65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.003
  • Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, 849–860. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
  • Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
  • Kozinets, R. V., Hemetsberger, A., & Schau, H. J. (2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds: Collective innovation in the Age of networked marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28, 339–354. doi: 10.1177/0276146708325382
  • Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., & Cinti, T. (2010). The regional development platform and “related variety”: Some evidence from Art and food in Tuscany. European Planning Studies, 18, 27–45. doi: 10.1080/09654310903343518
  • Lester, R., & Piore, M. (2004). Innovation: The missing dimension. London: Harvard University Press.
  • Menzel, M.-P. (2015). Interrelating dynamic proximities by bridging, reducing and producing distances. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1892–1907. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.848978
  • Mitchell, R., & Nicholas, S. (2006). Knowledge creation in groups: The value of cognitive diversity, transactive memory and open-mindedness norms. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 67–74.
  • Nilsen, P., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Fostering practice-based innovation through reflection at work. In H. Melkas & V. Harmaakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications (pp. 155–172). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Nooteboom, B., Van haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van den Oord, A. (2006). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Discussion Paper No. 2006-33, Tillburg University.
  • Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2005). Do organisational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance? Regional Studies, 39, 89–104. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320896
  • Ojasalo, J. (2015). Open innovation platform in a smart city: Empirical results. The Journal of American Business Review, 4, 195–202.
  • Parjanen, S. (2012). Creating Possibilities for Collective Creativity. Brokerage Functions in Practice-Based Innovation. Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 474. Lappeenranta: Yliopistopaino.
  • Parjanen, S., Melkas, H., & Uotila, T. (2011). Distances, knowledge brokerage and absorptive capacity in enhancing regional innovativeness: A qualitative case study of Lahti region, Finland. European Planning Studies, 19(6), 921–948. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.568804
  • Patrucco, P. (2011). Changing network structure in the organization of knowledge: The innovation platform in the evidence of the automobile system in Turin. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20, 477–493. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.562356
  • Rallet, A., & Torre, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
  • Sandberg, J., Holmström, J., Napier, N., & Levén, P. (2015). Balancing diversity in innovation networks: Trading zones in university-industry R&D collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 44–69. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2013-0088
  • Smart, P., Bessant, J., & Gupta, A. (2007). Towards technological rules for designing innovation networks: A dynamic capabilities view. International Journal of Operation Production Management, 27(10), 1069–1092. doi: 10.1108/01443570710820639
  • Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11).
  • Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2013). Cluster emergence and network evolution: A longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis. Regional Studies, 47, 651–668. doi: 10.1080/00343401003614258
  • Torre, A., & Gilly, J. P. (2000). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies, 34(2), 169–180. doi:10.1080/00343400050006087
  • Uotila, T., Harmaakorpi, V., & Hermans, R. (2012). Finnish mosaic of regional innovation system. Assessment of Thematic Regional Innovation Platforms Based on Related Variety. European Planning Studies, 20(10), 1583–1602. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.713331
  • Van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & Van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition process. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 1–33. doi: 10.1142/S1363919603000817
  • Verona, G., Prandelli, E., & Sawhney, M. (2006). Innovation and virtual environments: Towards virtual knowledge brokers. Organization Studies, 27(6), 765–788. doi: 10.1177/0170840606061073
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Winch, G., & Courtney, R. (2007). The organization of innovation brokers: An international review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(6), 747–763. doi: 10.1080/09537320701711223
  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Applied social research methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.