Municipal land allocations: a key for understanding tenure and social mix patterns in Stockholm

References

• Andersson, R. (2006). Breaking segregation – rhetorical construct or effective policy? The case of the metropolitan development initiative in Sweden. Urban Studies, 43(4), 787–799. doi: 10.1080/00420980600597608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., Bråmå, Å, & Holmqvist, E. (2010). Counteracting segregation: Swedish policies and experiences. Housing Studies, 25(2), 237–256. doi: 10.1080/02673030903561859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., & Magnusson Turner, L. (2014). Segregation, gentrification, and residualisation: From public housing to market-driven housing allocation in inner city Stockholm. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2013.872949
   Google Scholar
• Atmer, T. (1987). Land banking in Stockholm. Habitat International, 11(1), 47–55. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(87)90034-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. (2012). Path dependence or historical juncture? The Swedish housing regime before and after adjustment to the European competition policy. Paper presented at the ENHR 2012 Conference ‘Housing: Local Welfare and Local Markets in a Globalised World’, Lillehammer.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten, Z., & Holmqvist, E. (2013). Possibilities of building a mixed city – evidence from Swedish cities. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13(3), 288–311. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2013.809211
   Google Scholar
• Blücher, G. (2013). Planning legislation in Sweden – a history of power over land-use. In M. J. Lundström, C. Fredriksson, & J. Witzell (Eds.), Planning and sustainable urban development in Sweden (pp. 47–57). Stockholm: FFS.
   Google Scholar
• Bodstöm, K. (1994). Marken, makten och bostäderna. Markanvisning inom mark- och bostadspolitiken i Stockholm [Land, political influence and housing. Allocating development rights in Stockholm]. Stockholm: Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Bodström, K. (2006). Effects of public land leasing on housing Stockholm – a pattern of welfare? In Lee Jongkwon (Ed.), A review on public land leasing system and its feasibility in Korea (pp. 314–348). Seoul: Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, L., Sautkina, E., & Kearns, A. (2011). Mixed message about mixed tenure: Do reviews tell the real story? Housing Studies, 26(1), 69–94. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2010.512752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boverket [Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning]. (2013). [Housing market 2013–2014]. Karlskrona: Boverket.
   Google Scholar
• Caesar, C. (2016). Municipal land allocations: Integrating planning and selection of developers while transferring public land for housing in Sweden. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 257–275. doi: 10.1007/s10901-015-9457-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cars, G., Kalbro, T., & Lind, H. (2013). Nya regler för ökat bostadsbyggande och bättre infrastruktur [New rules for increased housing and better infrastructure]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Christophers, B. (2013). A monstrous hybrid: The political economy of housing in early twenty-first century Sweden. New Political Economy, 18(6), 885–911. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2012.753521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy, M. (2010). De-concentration of disadvantage and mixed income housing: A critical discourse approach. Housing, Theory and society, 27(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/14036090902767516
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. (1999). Alternative models of social housing: Tenure patterns and cost-renting in New Zealand and Sweden. Housing Studies, 14(4), 453–472. doi: 10.1080/02673039982722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Kam, G., Needham, B., & Buitelaar, E. (2014). The embeddedness of inclusionary housing in planning and housing system: Insights from an international comparison. Journal of housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), 389–402. doi: 10.1007/s10901-013-9354-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsinga, M., & Lind, H. (2013). The effect of EU-legislation on rental systems in Sweden and the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 28(7), 960–970. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2013.803044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESO. (2013). Bäste herren på täppan? En ESO-rapport om bostadsbyggande och kommunala markanvisningar [Best king of the hill? An ESO-report about housing and municipal land allocations]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
   Google Scholar
• ESO. (2016). Boende med konsekvens – en ESO-rapport om etnisk bostadssegregation och arbetsmarknad [Housing with consequence – an ESO-report ethnic housing segregation and labor market]. Stockholm: Nordstedts Juridik.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2007). Neighbourhood social mix as a goal of housing policy: A theoretical analysis. European Journal of Housing Policy, 7(1), 19–43. doi: 10.1080/14616710601132526
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., & Friedrichs, J. (2015). The dialectic of neighborhood social mix: Editors’ introduction to the special issue. Housing Studies, 30(2), 175–191. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1035926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E., Manley, D., Hiscock, R., Boyle, P., & Doherty, J. (2009). Mixing housing tenures: Is it good for social well-being? Urban Studies, 46(1), 139–165. doi: 10.1177/0042098008098640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hårsman, B. (2006). Ethnic diversity and spatial segregation in the Stockholm region. Urban Studies, 43(8), 1341–1364. doi: 10.1080/00420980600776434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedin, K., Clark, E., Lundholm, E., & Malmberg, G. (2012). Neoliberalization of housing in Sweden: Gentrification, filtering and social polarization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(2), 443–463. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.620508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, J. (2009). Two types of rental system? An exploratory empirical test of Kemeny’s rental system typology. Urban Studies, 46(1), 45–62. doi: 10.1177/0042098008098636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, E. (2009). Politik och planering för ett blandat boende och minskad boendesegregation: ett mål utan medel? [Policy and planning for social and housing mix and decreased housing segregation: A goal without means?]. Uppsala: Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, E., & Bergsten, Z. (2009). Swedish social mix policy: A general policy without an explicit ethnic focus. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(4), 477–490. doi: 10.1007/s10901-009-9162-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, E., & Magnusson Turner, L. (2014). Swedish welfare state and housing markets: Under economic and political pressure. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(2), 237–254. doi: 10.1007/s10901-013-9391-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., & Mason, P. (2007). Mixed tenure communities and neighbourhood quality. Housing Studies, 22(5), 661–691. doi: 10.1080/02673030701474628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. (2006). Corporatism and housing regimes. Housing, Theory and Society, 23(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/14036090500375423
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J., Kersloot, J., & Thalmann, P. (2005). Non-profit housing influencing, leading and dominating the unitary rental market: Three case studies. Housing Studies, 20(6), 855–872. doi: 10.1080/02673030500290985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R. (2004). Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(4), 367–390. doi: 10.1007/s10901-004-3041-5
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Pettersson, F. (2017). Changes, problems, and challenges in Swedish spatial planning – an analysis of power dynamics. Sustainability, 9(10), 1836. doi: 10.3390/su9101836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontokosta, C. E. (2014). Mixed-income housing and neighborhood integration: Evidence from inclusionary zoning programs. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(4), 716–741. doi: 10.1111/juaf.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), 1–14. doi: 10.2307/1269547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennartz, C. (2011). Power structures and privatization across integrated rental markets: Exploring the cleavage between typologies of welfare regimes and housing systems. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(4), 342–359. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2011.562626
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, L., & Turner, B. (2008). Municipal housing companies in Sweden – social by default. Housing, Theory and Society, 25(4), 275–296. doi: 10.1080/14036090701657397
   Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A. (2000). Moving beyond the gentrification gaps: Social change, tenure change and gap theories in Stockholm. Urban Studies, 37(9), 1673–1693. doi: 10.1080/00420980020080311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., & Andersson, R. (2005). Housing mix, social mix, and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), 761–790. doi: 10.1177/1078087405276006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesslein, T. S. (2003). Market versus planning: An assessment of the Swedish housing model in the post-war period. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1259–1282. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000084596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passow, S. S. (1970). Land reserves and teamwork in planning Stockholm. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 36(3), 179–188. doi: 10.1080/01944367008977304
   Google Scholar
• Ratzka, A. D. (1981). Land banking in Stockholm: An evaluation of municipal residential leasehold as a public finance and housing subsidy instrument. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47(3), 279–288. doi: 10.1080/01944368108976510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. (2005). How divergent housing institutions evolve: A comparison of Swedish tenant co-operatives and Finnish shareholder’s housing companies. Housing, Theory and Society, 22(4), 213–236. doi: 10.1080/14036090500375373
   Google Scholar
• Sautkina, E., Bond, L., & Kearns, A. (2012). Mixed evidence on mixed tenure effects: Findings from a systematic review of UK studies, 1995–2009. Housing Studies, 27(6), 748–782. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.714461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCB. (2013). Markanvändningen i Sverige, sjätte utgåvan [Land use in Sweden, sixth edition]. Örebro: SCB-Tryck.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm. (2007). Budget för Stockholm stad 2007 [Budget for the city of Stockholm 2007]. Retrieved from http://www.stadshusab.stockholm.se/ekonomi-och-styrning/budget/
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm. (2009). Budget för Stockholm 2009 [Budget for the city of Stockholm 2009]. Retrieved from http://www.stadshusab.stockholm.se/ekonomi-och-styrning/budget/
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm. (2010a). Promenadstaden – Stockholms översiktsplan [The walkable city – Stockholm city plan]. Retrieved from http://www.stockholm.se/oversiktsplan
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm. (2010b). Markanvisningspolicy [Land allocation policy]. Retrieved from http://www.stockholm.se/TrafikStadsplanering/Stadsutveckling/Bostadsbyggande/Mark-inom-kommungransen/Markanvisningar/
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm. (2014). Budget för Stockholm stad 2014 [Budget for the city of Stockholm 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.stadshusab.stockholm.se/ekonomi-och-styrning/budget/
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm. (2015a). Budget för Stockholm stad 2015 [Budget for the city of Stockholm 2015]. Retrieved from http://www.stadshusab.stockholm.se/ekonomi-och-styrning/budget/
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm. (2015b). Retrieved from http://www.statistikomstockholm.se/index.php/oversiktlig-statistik
   Google Scholar
• Taşan-Kok, T., & Baeten, G., Eds. (2011). Contradictions of neoliberal planning: Cities, policies, and politics (Vol. 102). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, R. (2003). Mixed tenure’ policy in the UK: Privatisation, pluralism or euphemism? Housing, Theory and Society, 20(3), 153–159. doi: 10.1080/14036090310019445
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B., & Whitehead, C. (2002). Reducing housing subsidy: Swedish housing policy in an international context. Urban Studies, 39(2), 201–217. doi: 10.1080/00420980120102920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar