Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions

References

• Asheim, B. T. (2007). Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20, 223–241. doi: 10.1080/13511610701722846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45, 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past–present–future. In R. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of innovation (pp. 45–62). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2017). Smart specialization as an innovation-driven strategy for economic diversification: Examples from Scandinavian regions. In S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, R. Gheorghiu, L. Andreescu, & I. Wade (Eds.), Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization (pp. 74–99). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6, 131–140. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720451
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52, 134–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107. doi: 10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49, 733–751. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51, 31–45. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44, 355–389. doi: 10.1111/grow.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 212–239. doi: 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8
   Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48, 68–90. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Content, J., & Frenken, K. (2016). Related variety and economic development: A literature review. European Planning Studies, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365–382. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2007). Social capital, embeddedness, and market interactions: An analysis of firm performance in UK regions. Review of Social Economy, 65, 79–106. doi: 10.1080/00346760601132170
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012). From clusters to platform policies in regional development. European Planning Studies, 20, 1415–1424. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.680741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1994). The regional innovation system in Baden-Wurttemberg. International Journal of Technology Management, 9, 394–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1997). Values, beliefs and regional variations in new firm formation rates. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 179–199. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24, 243–263. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27, 133–153. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Triple helix clusters: Boundary permeability at university–industry–government interfaces as a regional innovation strategy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 766–779. doi: 10.1068/c1182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, 9–123. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00034-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS3). Brussels: Joint Research Center, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). National/regional innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Regional innovation scoreboard 2017. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1248–1267. doi: 10.1068/a43516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the creative class. City and Community, 2, 3–19. doi: 10.1111/1540-6040.00034
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2009). Understanding smart specialisation. In D. Pontikakis, D. Kyriakou, & R. Van Bavel (Eds.), The question of R&D specialisation, perspectives and policy implications (pp. 19–28). Brussels: Joint Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 492–507. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2017). The economic fundamentals of smart specialization strategies. In S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, R. Gheorghiu, L. Andreescu, & I. Wade (Eds.), Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization (pp. 37–50). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation–the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9, 100.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 635–649. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005. Regional Studies, 48, 955–973. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.816414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47, 760–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, J., Copeland, S., & Murie, A. (2009). Toward a ‘new’ strategic leadership of place for the knowledge-based economy. Leadership, 5, 5–23. doi: 10.1177/1742715008098307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties; the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. (2016). Institutions, smart specialisation dynamics and policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 22–37. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. (2018). Following or breaking regional development paths: On the role and capability of the innovative entrepreneur. Regional Studies, 80, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1463436
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Asheim, B. (2016). Cluster policy: Renewal through the integration of institutional variety. In D. Fornahl, R. Hassink, & M.-P. Menzel (Eds.), Broadening our knowledge on cluster evolution (pp. 76–94). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2017). Unrelated knowledge combinations: Unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Papers in Innovation Studies, CIRCLE, Lund University Nr. 2017/10:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science, 54, 299–321. doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2018). Regional growth paths: From structure to agency and back. Papers in Innovation Studies, Nr. 2018/1. Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Innovation policies and new regional growth paths: A place-based system failure framework. Papers in Innovation Studies No. 2016/26.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2010). Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 450–468). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Herstad, S. J., & Ebersberger, B. (2015). On the link between urban location and the involvement of knowledge-intensive business services firms in collaboration networks. Regional Studies, 49, 1160–1175. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.816413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Market Economics. (2017). Regional profiles. Indicators of Devleopment 2017. Retrieved from http://www.regionalprofiles.bg/en/
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2016, August 23–26). Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In 56th ERSA Congress, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems. In M. Parrilli, R. Fitjar, & A. Rodríguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Landabaso, M. (2014). Guest editorial on research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation in Europe. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 378–389. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-08-2014-0093
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38, 879–891. doi: 10.1080/0034340042000280910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37, 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography—rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86, 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Vol. 38. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Milberg, W., & Houston, E. (2005). The high road and the low road to international competitiveness: Extending the neo-Schumpeterian trade model beyond technology. International Review of Applied Economics, 19, 137–162. doi: 10.1080/02692170500031646
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 569–583.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., & Cooke, P. (1998). The associational economy: Firms, regions, and innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496189
   Google Scholar
• National Statistical Institute of the Republic of Bulgaria. (2018, June 6). Employed persons by regions. Retrieved from http://www.nsi.bg/en/content/5528/employed-persons-regions
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87, 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation. preliminary version. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34. doi: 10.1177/089124240001400105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. (2017). Assessing EU smart specialisation policy in a comparative perspective. In S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, R. Gheorghiu, L. Andreescu, & I. Wade (Eds.), Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization (pp. 2–36). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 673–706. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbu023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humbolt.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., & Doloreux, D. (2016). How open innovation processes vary between urban and remote environments: Slow innovators, market-sourced information and frequency of interaction. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28, 337–357. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1154984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20, 753–772. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., Beer, A., & Gibney, J. (2017). Making sense of leadership in urban and regional development. Regional Studies, 51, 187–193. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1267340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Heinonen, T. (2016). The triple helix model and the competence set: Human spare parts industry under scrutiny. Triple Helix, 3, 1–20. doi: 10.1186/s40604-016-0038-5
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2018). Institutional agency and path creation: Institutional path from industrial to knowledge city. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems - theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 85–104). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, 191–221. doi: 10.1177/096977649500200301
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N. P., & Osman, T. (2016). On specialization, divergence and evolution: A brief response to Ron Martin’s review. Regional Studies, 50, 1628–1630. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1183975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strambach, S. (2008). Knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) as drivers of multilevel knowledge dynamics. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 10, 152–174. doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2008.022117
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20, 1843–1866. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.723424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? European Planning Studies, 23, 1741–1758. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2017). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change. Progress in Human Geography. doi: 10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., & Otto, A. (2009). How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1217–1233. doi: 10.1068/a4129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., & Tödtling, F. (2007). Developing biotechnology clusters in non-high technology regions—the case of Austria. Industry and Innovation, 14, 47–67. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130590
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 63–78. doi: 10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8
   Google Scholar
• Westlund, H., & Kobayashi, K. (2013). Social capital and sustainable urban-rural relationships in the global knowledge society. In H. Westlund, & K. Kobayashi (Eds.), Social capital and rural development in the knowledge society (pp. 1–17). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar