New forms of multi-local working: identifying multi-locality in planning as well as public and private organizations’ strategies in the Helsinki region

References

• Arendt, H. (1992). Vita Activa oder Vom Tatigen Leben. 7th edn. München: Piper.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organisation Science, 22, 887–906. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M., Besussi, E., Maat, K., & Harts, J. J. (2004). Representing multifunctional cities: Density and diversity in space and time. Built Environment, 30(4), 324–337. doi: 10.2148/benv.30.4.324.57156
   Google Scholar
• Beekman, T. (2011). Fill in the generation gap. Strategic Finance; Montvale, 93(3), 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Gelatine: Making coworking places gel for better collaboration and social learning. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian computer-human interaction conference (OzCHI ‘13) (pp. 427–436). New York, NY: ACM. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/61844/7/61844a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2017). Curating the ‘third place’? Coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum: Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 82, 112–126. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, G., Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2012). Towards visualising people’s ecology of hybrid personal learning environments. In Proceedings of the 4th media architecture Biennale conference: Participation (MAB ‘12) (pp. 13–22). New York, NY: ACM. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/54006/1/MAB_G.Caldwell_M.Bilandzic_M.Foth.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Space of flows, space of places: Materials for a theory of urbanism in the information age. In S. Bishwapriya (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 45–66). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ciolfi, L., & de Carvalho, A. F. P. (2014). Work practices, nomadicity and the mediational role of technology. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23, 119–136. doi: 10.1007/s10606-014-9201-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Helsinki. (2013). Vision 2050, urban plan – The New Helsinki City plan. http://www.hel.fi/hel2/ksv/julkaisut/yos_2013-23_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• City of Helsinki. (2016). Helsinki’s new master plan (HELSINGIN YLEISKAAVA Selostus. Helsingin kaupunki KaupunkisuunnitteluvirastoKaupunkikaava – Helsingin uusi yleiskaava). https://www.hel.fi/hel2/ksv/julkaisut/yos_2016-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2014). Nomadic work as life-story plot. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23, 205–221. doi: 10.1007/s10606-013-9189-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Marino, M., & Lapintie, K. (2015). Libraries as transitory workspaces and spatial incubators. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1), 118–129.
   Google Scholar
• Di Marino, M., & Lapintie, K. (2017). Emerging workplaces in the post-functionalist cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 4(3), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich-Wesbuer, A., Kramer, C., Ene-Lacroix, C. E. D., & Rumpolt, P. (2015). Multi-local living arrangements: Approaches to quantification in German language official statistics and surveys. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 106(4), 409–424. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurofound. (2014). Living and working in Europe. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1514en_5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. (2016). Annual work programme 2016. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1560en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Forlano, L. (2008). When code meets place: Collaboration and innovation at WiFi hotspots. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Forlano, L. (2011). Building the open-source city: Changing work environments for collaboration and innovation. In From social butterfly to engaged citizen: Urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement (pp. 437–460). Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-01651-3.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, M., Forlano, L., & Bilandzic, M. (2016). Mapping new work practices in the smart city. In H. Friese, G. Rebane, M. Nolden, & M. Schreiter (Eds.), Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten (pp. 1–13). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., & Gupta, N. (2008). Community and social interaction in the wireless city: Wi-Fi use in public and semi-public spaces. New Media & Society, 10(6), 831–850. doi: 10.1177/1461444808096247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Livio, O., & Goulet, L. S. (2010). The social life of wireless urban spaces: Internet use, social networks, and the public realm. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 701–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, S. (2005). Perspectives on the geographic stability and mobility of people in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 15301–15306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507309102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen, J., Jalas, M., Juntunen J.K., Ala-Mantila, S., & Junnila, S. (2013). Situated lifestyles: I. How lifestyles change along with the level of urbanization and what the greenhouse gas implications are – A study of Finland. Environmental Research Letters, 8(13), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Helsinki Uusimaa Region. (2016). Regional land use plan, Maakuntakaava. https://www.uudenmaanliitto.fi/en/development_and_planning/regional_land_use_planning
   Google Scholar
• Helsinki Uusimaa Regional Council. (2014). The Helsinki-Uusimaa Regional Programme. Vision and Strategy 2040, Strategic Priorities 2014–2017. https://www.uudenmaanliitto.fi/files/13281/Helsinki-Uusimaa_Regional_Programme_A31-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hermelin, B., & Trygg, K. (2012). New geographies of work: A case study from Sweden. Urbani izziv, 126–134. doi: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-supplement-1-012
   Google Scholar
• Hilti, N. (2009). Here, there and in-between: On the interplay and multilocal living, space and inequality. In T. Ohnmacht, H. Maksim, & M. M. Bergman (Eds.), Mobilities and inequalities (pp. 145–163). Burlington: Ashgate publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltunen, M. J., & Rehunen, A. (2014). Second home mobility in Finland: Patterns, practices and relations of leisure oriented mobile lifestyle. Fennia – International Journal of Geography, 192(1), 1–22. doi: 10.11143/8384
   Google Scholar
• Hoppenbrouwer, E., & Louw, E. (2005). Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands. European Planning Studies, 13(7), 967–983. doi: 10.1080/09654310500242048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, K., Foth, M. & Hearn, G. N. (2018). Working from the other office: Trialling coworking spaces for public servants. Australian Journal of Public Administration. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12317
   Google Scholar
• Humphry, J. (2014). Officing: Mediating time and the professional self in the support of nomadic work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23, 185–204. doi: 10.1007/s10606-013-9197-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huning, S., Bens, O., & Hüttl, R. F. (2012). Demographic change beyond the urban–rural divide: Re-framing spatial differentiation in the context of migration flows and social networks. DIE ERDE, 143(1–2), 153–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, V. (2005). Mobilités et réversibilités: vers des sociétés plus fluides. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie. 52, CXVIII, 119–135. doi: 10.3917/cis.118.0119
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, S. (2017). IBM, remote-work pioneer, is calling thousands of employees back to the office. https://qz.com/924167/ibm-remote-work-pioneer-is-calling-thousands-of-employees-back-to-the-office/
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, J. P. (2018). Vicarious habitation – Reinterpreting the role of peripheral living in a Nordic context. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 279–296. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koroma, J., Hyrkkänen, U., & Vartiainen, M. (2014). Looking for people, places and connections: Hindrances when working in multiple locations. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(2), 139–159. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laasonen, V., & Kolehmainen, J. (2017). Capabilities in knowledge-based regional development – Towards a dynamic framework. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1673–1692. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1337727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liegl, M. (2014). Nomadicity and the care of place – On the aesthetic and affective organisation of space in freelance creative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23, 163–183. doi: 10.1007/s10606-014-9198-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw, E., & Bruinsma, F. (2006). From mixed to multiple land use. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10901-005-9029-y
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, N. (2009). Re-thinking amenity migration: Integrating mobility, lifestyle and social-ecological systems. Die Erde, 140(3), 229–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Treasury, Government Resolution on State Building Strategies. (2014). Valtioneuvoston periaatepäätös valtion toimitilastrategiaksi. http://vm.fi/documents/10623/1256367/VN_periaatepts_toimitilastrategiaksi/
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, R. (2016). Plug and play places: Subjective standardaztion of places in multilocal lifewords. In P. Pucci & M. Colleoni (Eds.), Understanding mobilities for designing contemporary cities (pp. 109-128). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. (2001). Celebrating the third place. Inspiring stories about the ‘great good places’ at the heart of our communities. New York, NY: Marlowe & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, C. (2009). Re-positioning second homes within housing studies: Household investment, gentrification, multiple residence, mobility and hyper-consumption. Housing, Theory and Society, 26(4), pp. 292–310. doi: 10.1080/14036090802300392
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Work-home boundary management using communication and information technology. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(2), 133–152. doi: 10.1037/a0022759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. C., & Thorns, D. C. (2006). Home away from home: The primary/second-home relationship. In N. McIntyre, D. Williams, & K. E. Hugh (Eds.), Multiple dwelling and tourism. Negotiating place, home and identity (pp. 67–81). Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Reuschke, D. (2012). Dwelling conditions and preferences in a multilocational way of life for job reasons. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, 11–30. doi: 10.1007/s10901-011-9245-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinne, J., Paloniemi, R., Tuulentie, S., & Kietäväinen, A. (2015). Participation of second-home users in local planning and decision-making – A study of three cottage-rich locations in Finland. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 7(1), 98–114. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2014.909818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolshoven, J. (2006). Woanders daheim. Kulturwissenschaftliche Ansätze zur multilokalen Lebensweise in der Spätmoderne. Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 102(2), 179–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rolshoven, J. (2008). The temptations of the provisional. Multilocaliy as a way of life. Journal of European Ethnology, 37(1–2), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Säynäjoki, E. S., Inkeri, I., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. (2014). How central business district developments facilitate environmental sustainability – A multiple case study in Finland. Cities (London, England), 41, 101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A., Forlano, L., & Simeti, A. (2011). Breakout! escape from the office: Situating knowledge work in sentient public spaces. Sentient city: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space, edited by M. Shepard. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weichart, P. (2015). Residential multi-locality: In search of theoretical frameworks. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 106(4), 378–391. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiske, C., Petzold, K., & Schad, H. (2015). Multi-local living – The approaches of rational choice theory, sociology of everyday life and actor-network theory. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 106(4), 392–408. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar