615
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Differentiated regional entrepreneurial discovery processes. A conceptual discussion and empirical illustration from three emergent clusters

, , &
Pages 2200-2215 | Received 15 Mar 2018, Accepted 28 Sep 2018, Published online: 08 Oct 2018

References

  • Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131. doi: 10.2307/2234208
  • Asheim, B., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Smart specialization: Sources for new path development in a peripheral manufacturing region. Papers in innovation studies. Paper no. 2015/11 (pp. 1–25). Circle, Lund University. Retrieved from http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201511_Asheim_Grillitsch.pdf
  • Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitius’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013100704794
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2015). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
  • Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation (pp. 64–81). London: Routledge.
  • Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12028
  • Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2002). Diversity and specialization in cities: Why, where and when does it matter? In P. McCann (Ed.), Industrial location economics (pp. 151–186). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation. Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxfor University press.
  • Edtech, O. (2017). About Oslo Edtech cluster. Retrieved from http://osloedtech.no/en/
  • European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specializations (RIS3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Feldman, M., Francis, J., & Bercovitz, J. (2005). Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Studies, 39(1), 129–141. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320888
  • Feldman, M. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialisation and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43, 409–429. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
  • Foray, D. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 492–507. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096
  • Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialization: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
  • Fritsch, M. (2011). The effect of new business formation om regional development: Empirical evidence, interpretation, and avenues for further research. In M. Fritsch (Ed.), Handbook of research on entrepreneruship and regional development (pp. 58–106). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969. doi: 10.1177/0170840607078958
  • Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
  • Gertler, M. S. (2004). Manufacturing culture: The institutional geography of industrial practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.
  • Henning, M., Stam, E., & Wenting, R. (2013). Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation? Regional Studies, 47(8), 1348–1362. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.750422
  • Holmen, A. K., & Fosse, J. K. (2017). Regional agency and constitution of new paths: A study of agency in early formation of new paths on the west coast of Norway. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 498–515. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1276159
  • Hustoft, A. G., Hartvedt, H., Nymoen, E., Stålnacke, M., & Utne, H. (1999). Standard for økonomiske regioner. Rapporter 99/6. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
  • Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbu026
  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. D. Parilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodriguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). London: Routledge.
  • Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729693
  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863
  • Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography-rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
  • Miöner, J., & Trippl, M. (2017). Paving the way for new regional industrial paths: Actors and modes of change in Scania’s games industry. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 481–497. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1212815
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  • Petrov, A. N. (2011). Beynd spillovers. Interogating innovation and creativity in the peripheries. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory. Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. 168–190). London: Routledge.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Cluster and the new economics of competition. Harward Business Review, November-December, 77–90.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Wilkie, C. (2015). Institutions and the entrepreneurial discovery process for smart specialization. In Papers in evolutionary economic geography # 15.23 (pp. 1–27). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
  • Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112. doi: 10.1068/c1066r
  • Spigel, B. (2013). Bourdieuian approaches to the geography of entrepreneurial cultures. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(9-10), 804–818. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2013.862974
  • Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2017). Towards a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/sej.1268
  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems. From old legacies to new development paths. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development. Evolution, innovation and transition (pp. 297–317). London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.