Social Innovation Regime: an integrated approach to measure social innovation

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management. New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and social transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282. doi: 10.1177/0021886304266847
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 12, 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, C., Havas, A., & Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2015). Overview of existing innovation indicators creating innovation space for social innovation (CRESSI). Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bejaminsen, L., & Andrade, S. B. (2015). Testing a typology of homelessness across welfare regimes: Shelter use in Denmark and the USA. Housing Studies, 30(6), 858–876. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2014.982517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkmann, J. (2014). Measuring vulnerability to natural Hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. New York, Tokyo, Paris: UN University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bukodi, E., & Róbert, P. (2007). Occupational mobility in Europe. Foundations for the improvement of living and working conditions in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Spila, J., & Unceta, A. (2015). Modes d'innovation sociale et gouvernance. In J. L. Klein (Ed.), La transformation sociale para l'innovation sociale. Quebec: CRISES.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., & Lynd Luers, A. (2006). Assesing the vulnerability of social environmental systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 31, 365–394. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. In E. C. Boureau of European policy Advisors (BEPA) (Ed.). Luxembourg: Publications of Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Guide to social innovation. In E. Commission (Ed.), Regional and Urban policy. Brussels: DG Regional and Urban Policy and DG Employment, Social affairs and Inclusion.
   Google Scholar
• Dhondt, S., van de Ven, H., Ziauberyte, R., Van Der Torre, W., Cressey, P., Kaderabkova, A., & Terstriep, J. (2016). Ex-Ante impact assessment & value network analysis for SI report task 7.1 of the project “boosting the impact of SI in Europe through economic underpinnings” (SIMPACT). Brussels: European Commission, DG Research & Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, T. (2010). The new pioneers: Sustainable business success through social innovation and social entrepreneurship. New York: Jon Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hamerijck, A., & Myles, J. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, D., & Paugam, S. (2000). The experience of unemployment in Europe. In D. Gallie, & S. Paugam (Eds.), Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, E. R. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable. A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grassl, W. (2012). Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity. Journal of Social Entreprenesurship Perspectives, 1(1), 37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Grohs, S. (2014). Hybrid organizations in social service delivery in Quasimarkets: The case of Germany. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(11), 1425–1445. doi: 10.1177/0002764214534671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, A., & Dankbaar, B. (2014). Does social innovation require social entrepreneurship? Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(12), 17–26. doi: 10.22215/timreview/854
   Google Scholar
• Harding, R. (2006). Social entrepreneurship monitor. Global Entrepreneurship London. London: London Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2014). Theoretical approaches to social innovation – A critica review A deliverable from the project: “social innovation driving force for social change” (SI-DRIVE). Dortmund: Sozialforschungsstelle.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J.-L., & Harrison, D. (2007). L'innovation sociale. Émergence et effets sur la transformation sociale. Quebec: Presses de l'Universite du Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. London: Routdlege.
   Google Scholar
• Krlev, G., Bund, E., & Mildenberger, G. (2014). Measuring what matters. Indicators of social innovativeness on the national level. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 200–224. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Gordon, J. (2013). Social innovation, social entrepeneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philantropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 747–763. doi: 10.1177/0266242612443376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli, F. (2012). Social innovation or social exclusion? Innovating social services in the context of a retrieving welfare state. In H. W. e. a. Franz (Ed.), Challenge social innovation. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mechler, R. (2004). Natural disaster risk management and financing disaster losses in developing countries. Karlsruche: Verlag für Versicherungswissenshaft.
   Google Scholar
• Mechler, R., Hochrainer, S., Linnerrooth-Bayer, J., & Plug, G. (2014). Public sector financial vulnerability to disasters: The IIASA CATISM model. In J. Birkmann (Ed.), Measuring vulnerability to natural Hazars: Towards disaster resilient societies. New York, Tokyo, Paris: UN University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam Saman, S., & Kaderabkova, A. (2015). Social innovation in new member states. Part-I theoretical investigation on economic underpinnings simpact working paper. Gelshenkirchen: Institute for Work and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., Kippy, J., & Numan, W. (2013). Indicators for social innovation. In F. Gault (Ed.), Handbook of innovation indicators and measurement. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2016). New social contracts: How innovation in welfare will address needs and make use of new tools. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., Simon, J., & Gabriel, M. (2015). New frontiers in social innovation research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, B., & Whelan, T. C. (2011). Poverty and deprivation in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 876–885. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Ranci, C. (2010). Social vulnerability in Europe. The new configuration of social risks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, D., Terstriep, J., Welschhoff, J., & Alijani, S. (2015). Comparative report on social innovation framework-deliverable D1.1 of the project boosting the impact of social innovation in Europe through economic underpinnings. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, F., Cotter-Salvado, J., Lopo de Carvalho, I., Shutte, U. (2013). The life-cycle of social innovations. In Osburg, T. & Schidpeter, R. (Eds.), Social innovation: Sustainability, ethics and governance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, B., Krlev, G., Mildenberger, G., Bund, E., & Hubrich, D. (2013). Paving the way to measurement–A blue print for SI metrics. A short guide for research for policy makers A deliverable from the project the theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe (TEPSIE). Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2007). Ashoka’s big idea: Transforming the world through social enterpreneurship. Futures, 39(5), 534–553.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnergiak Social Innovation. (2013). Regional social innovation index. A regional index to measure social innovation. Bilbao: Innobasque
   Google Scholar
• Terstriep, J. (2016). Boosting si's social and economic impact. Gelshenkichen: Institute for Work and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Geoff, A., & Ann, L. (2000). Social entrepreneurship. A new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38(5), 328–338. doi: 10.1108/00251740010340517
   Google Scholar
• Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., & García Fronti, J. (2015). Social innovation indicators. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(2), 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., & García Fronti, J. (2017). The three governances in social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 406–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, T. C., & Maître, B. (2010). Welfare regime and social class variation in poverty and economic vulnerability in Europe: An analysis of EU-SILC. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 316–332. doi: 10.1177/0958928710374378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling SI for greater impact. Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social enterpreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–523.
   Google Scholar