Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks

References

• Alkire, S. (2005). Subjective quantitative studies of human agency. Social Lndicators Research, 74(1), 217–60. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-6525-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkire, S. (2007). Concepts and Measure of agency. OPHI Working Paper 9. Retrieved from http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/OPHI-wp09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alvord, S., Brown, D., & Letts, C. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 40(3), 260–282. doi: 10.1177/0021886304266847
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. (2017). Power in sustainability Transitions. Analysing power and (Dis)empowerment in transformative change towards environmental and social sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Governance, 27(6), 505–520. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.1777/full doi:10.1002/eet.1777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in transition. An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(40), 543–569. doi: 10.1177/1368431009349830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., … O’Riordan, T. (2017). Transformative social innovation and (Dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidee, J., Vantilborgh, T., Pepermans, R., Huybrechts, G., Willems, J., Jegers, M., & Hofmans, J. (2013). Autonomous motivation stimulates volunteers work effort: A self-determination theory approach to volunteerism. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 24(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9269-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS. (2015). In uw buurt, website. Retrieved from http://www.cbsinuwbuurt.nl/index.aspx?refresh=true&forcerefresh=1421770841628#pageLocation=index
   Google Scholar
• Chiappero-Martinetti, E., von Jacobi, N., Maestripieri, L., Ziegler, R., van der Linden, M., & van Beers, C. (2017). Comparison of four cases of social innovation in Europe: a statistical report. CRESSI Deliverable 7.2. ISBN: 978-0-9955387-5-7. Retrieved from https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research-projects/CRESSI/docs/CRESSI_Working_Paper_no.34_2017_D7.2.pdf. Last retrieved: 01/09/2018
   Google Scholar
• Cipolla, C., Joly, M. P., & Afonso, R. (2015). WP4 Case Study Report: DESIS Network Report. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2 -1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Josserand, E., Mehra, A., & Pitsis, T. S. (2016). The transformative power of network dynamics: A research agenda. Organization Studies, 37(3), 277–291. doi: 10.1177/0170840616629047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, J., & Rotmans, R. (2011). Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(1), 90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitru, A., Lema-Blanco, I., García-Mira, R., Haxeltine, A., & Frances, A. (2015). WP4 Case Study Report: Credit Unions. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2 -1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitru, A., Lema-Blanco, I., Kunze, I., & García-Mira, R. (2016). Slow Food Movement. Case -study report. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: the Politics of Alternative Development. Willey Blackwell. ISBN: ISBN: 978-1-557-86300-3.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, C., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass, 7(5), 373–384. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12048
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development; New Directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haxeltine, A., Pel, B., Wittmayer, J., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., & Avelino, F. (2017). Building a middle-range theory of transformative social innovation; theoretical pitfalls and methodological responses. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 59–77. Retrieved from http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/51 doi: 10.31637/epsir.17-1.5
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., & Giezen, M. (2017). Opening up the Transition Arena: An Analysis of (Dis)Empowerment of Civil Society Actors in Transition Management in Cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M., Avelino, F., Dorland, J., Rach, S., Wittmayer, J., Pel, B., … Kemp, R. (2016). Synthesis across social innovation case studies, TRANSIT Deliverable D4.4, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. S., Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., Elle, M., Pel, B., Bauler, T., … Longhurst, N. (2014). Methodological guidelines for case studies Batch I. Deliverable 4.1. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 grant agreement n. 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Jungmann, R., Baur, N., & Ametowobla, D. (2015). Grasping processes of innovation empirically. A call for expanding the methodological Toolkit. An introduction. Historische Sozialforschung/ Historical Social Research (HSR), 40, 3(153), 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kunze, I., & Avelino, F. (2015). Social Innovation and the Global Ecovillage Network. Research Report, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2 -1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Laville, J. (2003). A new European socioeconomic perspective. Review of Social Economy, 61(3), 389–405. doi: 10.1080/0034676032000115831
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, N., Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Heilscher, S., … Elle, M. (2016). Experimenting with alternative economies: Four emergent counter-narratives of urban economic development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 69–74. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343517300635 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Haxeltine, A., Kemp, R., O’Riordan, T., & Weaver, P. (2016). The economic crisis as a game-changer? Exploring the role of social construction in sustainability transitions. Ecology & Society, 21(4), 15. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss4/art15/ doi: 10.5751/ES-08761-210415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2007). Design research for sustainable social innovation. In R. Michel (Ed.), Design research now. Essays and selected projects (pp. 233–245). Birkhäuser Basel: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-7643-8472-2_14
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. (Ed.). (2013). The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Mehmood, A., MacCallum, D., & Leubolt, B. (Eds.). (2017). Social innovation as a trigger for transformations - the role of research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. doi: 10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A., & Leubolt, B. (2005). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social innovation and the dialectical relationship of state and civil society. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2023–2036. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B., Bauler, T., Avelino, F., Backhaus, J., Ruijsink, S., Rach, S., & Kemp, R. (2017). The Critical Turning Points database; concept, methodology and dataset of an international Transformative Social Innovation comparison, TRANSIT Working Paper # 10, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Joumal of Community Psychology, 15, 121–148. doi: 10.1007/BF00919275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznickova, A., & Zepeda, L. (2016). Can self-determination theory explain the self-perpetuation of social innovations? A case study of slow food at the University of Wisconsin—Madison. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 26(1), 3–17. doi: 10.1002/casp.2229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley-Duff, R. (2009). Co-operative social enterprises: Company rules, access to finance and management practice. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(1), 50–68. doi: 10.1108/17508610910956408
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A. (2009). Social innovation for neighbourhood revitalization: A case of empowered participation and integrative dynamics in Spain. In D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, & S. Vicari-Haddock (Eds.), Social innovation and Territorial development (pp. 81–100). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2003). Flourishing under fire: Resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving. Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-lived, 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1985). Wellbeing agency and freedom: The dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom (1 ed.). New York: Knopf Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations: Exploring the role of community-based social movements in sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 381–400. doi: 10.1068/c10222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2018). Innovation, sustainability and democracy: An analysis of grassroots contributions. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(1), 64–97. doi: 10.22381/JSME6120183
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretative” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkens, E., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2015). Graag meer empirische en minder eufore kijk op burgerinitiatieven, Sociale Vraagstukken. Retrieved from http://www.socialevraagstukken.nl/site/2015/01/17/graag-meer-empirische-en-minder-eufore-kijk-op-burgerinitiatieven/.
   Google Scholar
• TRANSIT project 2017. Retrieved from http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Van der Bosch, S. (2010). Transition experiments: Exploring societal changes towards sustainability (PhD Thesis). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van Stigt, M. (2013). Wat als iedereen straks zzp’er is, Sociale Vraagstukken. Retrieved from http://www.socialevraagstukken.nl/site/column/wat-als-iedereen-straks-zzper-is/
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., & Afonso, R. (Eds.). (2015). WP4 CASE STUDY Report: Impact Hub. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169. Retrieved from http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/resource-hub/wp-4-case-study-report-impact-hub
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., Dorland, J., Pel, B., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2015). Methodological guidelines Batch 2. TRANSIT Deliverable 4.3. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., Kemp, R., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Pel, B., Ruisijnk, S., Jørgensen, M. S., & Rach, S. (2017). Transformative social innovation – What have we learned in four years of research? TRANSIT Brief #6. TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Bauler, T., & Avelino, F. (2017). Editorial synthesis: Methodological challenges in social innovation research. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 1–16. doi: 10.31637/epsir.17-1.1
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorationsin empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Joumal of Community Psychology, 20, 707–727. doi: 10.1007/BF01312604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar