Green infrastructure under pressure. A global narrative between regional vision and local implementation

References

• Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization to institutional design. Planning Theory, 4(3), 209–223. doi: 10.1177/1473095205058494
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Haughton, G., & Shepherd, E. (2016). Where is planning to be found? Material practices and the multiple spaces of planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 38–51. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict, M. A., & McMahon, E. T. (2006). Green infrastructure. Linking landscapes and communities. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandtner, C., Höllerer, M. A., Meyer, R. E., & Kornberger, M. (2017). Enacting governance through strategy: A comparative study of governance configurations in Sydney and Vienna. Urban Studies, 54(5), 1075–1091. doi: 10.1177/0042098015624871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantz, D., & Dümpelmann, S. (Eds.). (2011). Greening the city. Urban landscapes in the twentieth century. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces. Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. (2014). The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 2–36. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2013.854695
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, P., Madanipour, A., Davoudi, S., & Vigar, G. (2016). Maintaining stable regional territorial governance institutions in timesa of change. In P. Schmitt & L. Van Well (Eds.), Territorial governance across Europe. Pathways, practices and prospects (pp. 141–156). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2007). The visual language of spatial planning: Exploring cartographic representations for spatial planning in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duvall, P., Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2018). The ‘natures’ of planning: Evolving conceptualizations of nature as expressed in urban planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 480–501. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1404556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eftec. (2015). Manchester green infrastructure strategy technical report. Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Ernste, H. (2012). Framing cultures of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 87–101. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661194
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: Green infrastructure (GI) enhancing Europes natural capital. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. (2015). Formal institutional change and informal institutional persistence: The case of Dutch provinces implementing the spatial planning act. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 428–444. doi: 10.1068/c1391
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2009). Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 356–377. doi: 10.1177/1078087408324000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1993). Practice stories: The priority of practical judgment. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 186–212). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2005). Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning, 64, 183–234. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2016). Planungskultur – fruchtbare neue Konzeption? disP - The Planning Review, 52(4), 67–75. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2016.1273671
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D. (2012). Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: The case of national planning policy in Denmark. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1359–1392. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.680584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galland, D., & Elinbaum, P. (2015). Redefining territorial scales and the strategic role of spatial planning. Evidence from Denmark and Catalonia. disP – The Planning Review, 51(4), 66–85. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2015.1134963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galland, D., & Grønning, M. (2019). Spatial consciousness. In A. M. Orum (Ed.), Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of urban and regional studies. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. in press; forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Getimis, P. (2012). Comparing spatial planning systems and planning cultures in Europe. The need for a multi-scalar approach. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. E., Wessells, A. T., Lejano, R., & Butler, W. (2015). Narrating resilience: Transforming urban systems through collaborative storytelling. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1285–1303. doi: 10.1177/0042098013505653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, T. (2012). Sustainable urbanism and beyond. In T. Haas (Ed.), Sustainable urbanism and beyond. Rethinking cities for the future (pp. 8–13). New York, NY: Rizzoli International.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., & Pauleit, S. (2014). From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio, 43, 516–529. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0510-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., & Hoyler, M. (2014). Governing the new metropolis. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2249–2266. doi: 10.1177/0042098013500699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3), 299–320. doi: 10.1080/09654310500420792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies. Towards a relational planning for our times. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11(2), 188–207. doi: 10.1177/1473095211419333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2013). Circuits of knowledge and techniques: The transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1510–1526. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 63–85. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2017). Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: A European comparison. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 994–1012. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Planning culture – A concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2133–2147. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1018404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, S. (2010). The principles of green urbanism. Transforming the city for sustainability. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2014). Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: Reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Planning Review, 85(5), 563–587. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2014.35
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Keitel, M. (2014). Managing urban riverscapes: Towards a cultural perspective of land and water governance. Water International, 39(6), 842–857. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2014.957797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, A. (2018). The Metropolitan Green Belt, changing an institution. Progress in Planning, 121, 1–28. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, B. L., & Borén, T. (2015). Barriers to implementing sustainability locally: A case study of policy immobilities. Local Environment, 20(12), 1489–1506. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2014.909798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2002). Politics and scale: Some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61, 169–179. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., & Newell, J. P. (2017). Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, 62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I. C. (2013). Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? Examining the ‘green’ of green infrastructure development. Local Environment, 18(2), 152–166. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.719019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I. C. (2016). Green infrastructure planning: Policy and objectives. In D. Sinnett, N. Smith, & S. Burgess (Eds.), Handbook on green infrastructure. Planning, design and implementation (pp. 105–123). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mell, I., Allin, S., Reimer, M., & Wilker, J. (2017). Strategic green infrastructure planning in Germany and the UK: A transnational evaluation of the evolution of urban greening policy and practice. International Planning Studies, 22(4), 333–349. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2017.1291334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., de Haan, F., Horne, R., & Gleeson, B. J. (Eds.). (2018). Urban sustainability transitions. Australian cases – international perspectives. Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. (2012). International comparative planning methodology: Introduction to the theme issue. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.669928
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2014). Spatial planning in the United Kingdom, 1990–2013. In M. Reimer, P. Getimis, & H. H. Blotevogel (Eds.), Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. A comparative perspective on continuity and changes (pp. 189–214). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P. (2001). Urban planning and sustainable development. European Planning Studies, 9(4), 503–524. doi: 10.1080/09654310120049871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2017). Talk to the hand: Strategic spatial planning as persuasive storytelling of the loop city. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 978–993. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1296936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F. (2012). Uncovering the unconscious dimensions of planning. Using culture as a tool to analyse spatial planning practice. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F. (2014). The concept of planning culture: Analysing how planners construct practical judgements in a culturised context. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 3(2), 1–17. doi: 10.4018/ijepr.2014040101
   Google Scholar
• Regionalverband Ruhr. (2009). Robert Schmidt. Denkschrift betreffend Grundsätze zur Aufstellung eines General-Siedelungsplanes. Reprint. Essen: Klartext Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., & Blotevogel, H. H. (2012). Comparing spatial planning practice in Europe: A plea for cultural sensitization. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659517
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 9(1), 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11–28. doi: 10.1080/1464935032000057209
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (2016). Revisiting comparative planning cultures: Is culture a reactionary rhetoric? Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), 658–662. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1230363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorio, F. S., Thomas, H., & Harris, N. (2018). Interpreting planners’ talk about change: An exploratory study. Planning Theory, 17(4), 605–627. doi: 10.1177/1473095217742183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulczewska, B., Giedych, R., & Maksymiuk, G. (2017). Can we face the challenge: How to implement a theoretical concept of green infrastructure into planning practice? Warsaw case study. Landscape Research, 42(2), 176–194. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1240764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(3), 248–259. doi: 10.1177/088541229601000302
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z. (2013). Rethinking planning culture: A new institutionalist approach. Town Planning Review, 84(6), 683–702. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2013.36
   Google Scholar
• Thiers, P., Stephan, M., Gordon, S., & Walker, A. (2018). Metropolitan eco-regimes and differing state policy environments: Comparing environmental governance in the Portland-Vancouver metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review, 54(6), 1019–1052. doi: 10.1177/1078087417693321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (2003). Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships. Planning Theory, 2(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1177/14730952030022003
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, J. (2014). Governance for urban sustainability and resilience. Responding to climate change and the relevance of the built environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M. (2012). Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning. Planning Theory, 11(3), 299–318. doi: 10.1177/1473095212440425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy ‘frames’ to ‘framing’: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92–112. doi: 10.1177/0275074014533142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. (2011). Understanding green infrastructure: The development of a contested concept in England. Local Environment, 16(10), 1003–1019. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.631993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepp, H. (2018). Regional green belts in the Ruhr region. A planning concept revisited in view of ecosystem services. Erdkunde, 72(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar