Urban sustainability: is densification sufficient?

References

• Albrechts, L., Baeton, G., & Spithoven, A. (1994, September 22–25). Politics, economic crisis and the planning of transport infrastructures. Paper presented to the conference ‘Are Local Strategies Possible? Planning Theory and Social Theory in Front of the Sustainable Development Problematique’, Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, A. S. (1997). Globalization and deindustrialization: Direct investment and the decline of manufacturing employment in 17 OECD nations. Journal of World-Systems Research, 3, 1–34. doi: 10.5195/JWSR.1997.119
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, B., & Røe, P. G. (2016). The social context and politics of large scale urban architecture: Investigating the design of Barcode, Oslo. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(3), 304–317. doi: 10.1177/0969776416643751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asafu-Adjaye, J., Blomquist, L., Brand, S., Brook, B., DeFries, R., Ellis, E., … Teague, P. (2015). An ecomodernist manifesto. Retrieved from www.ecomodernism.org
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J., & Paterson, M. (2003). The British state and the environment: New Labour’s ecological modernization strategy. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 2, 237–249. doi: 10.1504/IJESD.2003.003842
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. (2000). Preserving biodiversity: Challenges for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 5–20. doi: 10.1080/01944360008976080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Wolfe, M. (2007). Energy efficiency in multi-family housing: A profile and analysis. Washington, DC: Energy Program Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, R. W., Shad, N. A., Listokin, D., Phillips, H., Downs, A., Seskin, S., & Gall, M. (1998). The costs of sprawl – revisited. Washington: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of European Communities. (1990). Green paper on the urban environment. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, R., & O’Neill, D. (2013). Enough is enough. Building a sustainable economy in a world of finite resources. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elldér, E. (2014). Residential location and daily travel distances: The influence of trip purpose. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engebretsen, Ø. (1993). Arealbruk i tettsteder 1955–1992. TØI Report 177/1993. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretsen, Ø, Næss, P., & Strand, A. (2018). Residential location, workplace location and car driving in four Norwegian cities. European Planning Studies, 26(10), 2036–2057. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1505830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelien, E., Steinnes, M., & Bloch, V. V. H. (2005). Tilgang til friluftsområder. Metode og resultater. Notater 2005/15. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Urban agenda for the EU: Sustainable use of land and nature-based solutions partnership. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/sul-nbs_finalactionplan_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 1–30. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1981). Afterword. In J. E. Rifkin (Ed.), A new world view (pp. 261–270). New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. J., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2003). Capitalism’s growth imperative. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(1), 25–48. doi: 10.1093/cje/27.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (1997). Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 95–106. doi: 10.1080/01944369708975727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartoft-Nielsen, P. (2001). Arbejdspladslokalisering og transportadfærd. Hørsholm: Forskningscenteret for skov og landskab.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital and the crises of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hille, J. (2013). Norsk forbruk og miljøet. Framtiden i våre hender rapport 5/2013. Oslo: Framtiden i våre hender.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, E. (2007). Achieving sustainable mobility. Everyday and leisure-time travel in the EU. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S., & Malm, A. (2015). “Green fix” as crisis Management, or: In which world is Malmö the world’s greenest city? Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 97(4), 275–290. doi: 10.1111/geob.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G. (1997). Sustainable development. In D. Brune, D. Chapman, M. O. Gwynne, & J. M. Pacyna (Eds.), The global environment. Science, technology and management (Vol. 2, pp. 1185–1208). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G., & Holden, E. (2001). Housing as basis for sustainable consumption. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(1), 48–58. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2001.001545
   Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G., & Næss, P. (2001). The ecological traces of growth: Economic growth, liberalization, increased consumption—and sustainable urban development?. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3(3), 177–192. doi: 10.1002/jepp.84
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science and Politics, 28, 57–71. doi: 10.1017/S1049096500056080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (eds.). (1996). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? London: E and FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbenstvedt, M., & Hjorthol, R. (1987). Bytrafikk, bomiljø og helse. Resultater fra NTNF-programmet Trafikk og miljø’s førundersøkelser på Vålerenga/Gamlebyen i Oslo 1987. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Krier, L. (1996). Architecture choix ou fatalité. Paris: Norma.
   Google Scholar
• Lefévre, B. (2010). Urban transport energy consumption: Determinants and strategies for its reduction. Sapiens, 2, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lian, J. I. (2004). Delvis brukerfinansiert utbygging av transportsystemet i Oslo og Akershus. Evaluering av Oslopakke 1 og 2. TØI rapport 714. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2017). Generated traffic and induced travel. Implications for transport planning. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., Pasqual, U., Vivien, F.-D., & Zaccai, E. (2010). Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 69, 1741–1747. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., Vlastos, T., & Barbopoplos, N. (2008). Relationships between urban form and travel behaviour in Athens, Greece. A comparison with Western European and North American results. European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, 8, 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (1995). The refinement of production. Ecological modernization theory and the chemical industry. Dublin: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory in debate: A review. In A. P. J. Mol, & D. Sonnenfeld (Eds.), Ecological modernization around the world (pp. 17–49). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., Spaargaren, G., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2014). Ecological modernization theory: where do we stand? In: M. Bemmann, B. Metzger, & R. von Detten (Eds.), Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften, (pp. 35–66). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), Article 2. doi: 10.14448/jes.01.0002
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Copenhagen. (2007). Eco-metropolis: Our vision for Copenhagen 2015. Copenhagen: The municipality of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Oslo. (2015). Kommuneplan 2015: Oslo mot 2030 – Smart, trygg og grønn. Oslo: The Municipality of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Oslo. (2019). Folkemengde, 10 soner. Retrieved from http://statistikkbanken.oslo.kommune.no/webview/
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Oslo (2013). Statistisk Årbok 2013. Oslo: The Municipality of Oslo, Development and improvement authority.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2005). Residential location affects travel behavior—but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 63(2), 167–257. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2004.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2011). Economic growth, urban development and environmental sustainability/Crescita economica, sviluppo urbano e sostenibilità ambientale. In F. D. Moccia (Ed.), Abitare la Città Ecologica/Housing ecocity (pp. 48–77). Naples: CLEAN.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2012). Urban form and travel behavior: Experience from a Nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(2), 21–45. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2014). Urban form, sustainability and health: The case of Greater Oslo. European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1524–1543. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.797383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Høyer, K. G. (2009). The emperor’s green clothes: Growth, decoupling and capitalism. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 20(3), 74–95. doi: 10.1080/10455750903215753
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Næss, T., & Strand, A. (2011). Oslo’s farewell to urban sprawl. European Planning Studies, 19(1), 113–139. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.530395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Sandberg, S. L. (1996). Workplace location, modal split and energy use for commuting trips. Urban Studies, 33(3), 557–580. doi: 10.1080/00420989650011915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Sandberg, S. L., & Røe, P. G. (1996). Energy use for transportation in 22 Nordic towns. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 13(2), 79–97. doi: 10.1080/02815739608730401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., Strand, A., Wolday, F., & Stefansdottir, H. (2019). Residential location, commuting and non-work travel in two urban areas of different size and with different center structures. Progress in Planning, 128, 1–36. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1999). Sustainability and cities. Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC/Covelo, CA: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noland, R. B., & Lem, L. L. (2002). A review of the evidence for induced travel and changes in transportation and environmental policy in the US and the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Council of Ministers. (1999). Factors 4 and 10 in the Nordic countries: The transport sector, the forest sector, the building and real estate sector, the food supply chain. TemaNord. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011, May). Towards green growth. A summary for policy makers. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/48012345.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. (2007). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisjonen. (2007). Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av bærekraftig arealplanlegging og arealdisponering I Norge (Dokument nr. 3:11 (2006–2007)). Oslo: Norwegian National Auditing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Røe, P. G. (2001). Storbymenneskets hverdagsreiser. Sammenhenger mellom bosted, livsstil og hverdagsreisepraksis i et senmoderne perspektiv (Dr. Polit. dissertation). Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Røe, P. G., & Jones, K. (1997). Bystruktur og trafikkulykker. Hvilke byplanforhold har betydning for ulykkessituasjonen i norske byer? Prosjektrapport 1997:12. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F. M., & Diest, M. (2001). Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and polycentric urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 173–186. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00009-6
   Google Scholar
• Seippel, Ø. (2000). Ecological modernization as a theoretical device: Strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2, 287–302. doi: 10.1080/714038562
   Google Scholar
• Sletten, Ø, & Gulbrandsen, J. (2012). Holdningsundersøkelse om bomring, trafikk og kollektivtilbud i Oslo og Akershus 1989-2012. PROSAM report no. 199. Oslo: National Road Authority, Region East.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2019). Areal og befolkning i tettsteder, etter tettsted, statistikkvariabel og år. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/04859/?rxid=5a5561ea-67b0-4bed-937b-fbb177ba3b82
   Google Scholar
• Strannegård, L. (1999). Black-boxing eco-modernization. Nature and market discourses in leadership practice. Stockholm: Centre for Advanced Studies in Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Strømmen, K. (2001). Rett virksomhet på rett sted – om virksomheters transportskapende egenskaper (Ph.D. thesis), Norwegian University of Technology and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Stutz, J. (2010). The three-front war: Pursuing sustainability in a world shaped by explosive growth. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 6(2), 49–59. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2010.11908049
   Google Scholar
• UK’s Department of Communities and Local Government. (2012). National planning policy framework. London.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, D. S. (2013). Does commuting time tolerance impede sustainable urban mobility? Analysing the impacts on commuting behaviour as a result of workplace relocation to a mixed-use centre in Lisbon. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, K., & Musall, E. (2012). Net zero energy buildings - international projects of carbon neutrality in buildings (2nd ed.). Munich: Institut für internationale Architektur-Dokumentation GmbH & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Weale, A. (1992). The new politics of pollution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolday, F., Cao, X., & Næss, P. (2018). Examining factors that keep residents with high transit preference away from transit-rich zones and associated behavior outcomes. Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum/PwC. (2018). Circular economy in cities evolving the model for a sustainable urban future. White paper. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, J. (2014). Economic growth and sustainable housing: An uneasy relationship. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2005). Commuting impacts of spatial decentralization: A comparison of Atlanta and Boston. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 35(1), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Day, J. E., Langford, B. C., Cherry, C. R., Jones, L. R., Han, S. S., & Sun, J. (2016). Commute responses to employment decentralization: Anticipated versus actual mode choice behaviors of new town employees in Kunming, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. C. (Ed.). (2000). The emergence of ecological modernization: Integrating the environment and the economy? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zegras, C. (2010). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership & use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 47, 1793–1817. doi: 10.1177/0042098009356125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, B., & Kockelman, K. (2008). Self-selection in home choice: Use of treatment effects in evaluating the relationship between the built environment and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2077, 54–61. doi: 10.3141/2077-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar