Evaluating Integrated Sustainable Urban Development Strategies: a methodological framework applied in Portugal

References

• Alves, S. (2017). Assessing the impact of area-based initiatives in deprived neighbourhoods: The example of S. João de Deus in Porto, Portugal. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), 381–399. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2016.1245081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armondi, S., & De Gregorio-Hurtado, S. (2019). Foregrounding urban agendas in European policy-making. The urban Book Series. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2001). The emerging ‘urban agenda’ and the European spatial development perspective: Towards an EU urban policy? European Planning Studies, 9(3), 385–406. doi: 10.1080/09654310120037630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, T. (1995). Urban policy in practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breda-Vázquez, I., Conceição, P., & Móia, P. (2010). Learning from urban policy diversity and complexity: Evaluation and knowledge sharing in urban policy. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(2), 209–239. doi: 10.1080/14649351003759656
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2006). Addressing Europe’s urban challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN community initiative. Urban Studies, 43(12), 2145–2162. doi: 10.1080/00420980600990456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCDR_LVT. (2010). PIC URBAN II Lisboa (Vale de Alcântara). Relatório final de Execução. Lisbon: Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo.
   Google Scholar
• CCDR_LVT. (2011). PIC URBAN II Amadora (Damaia-Buraca). Relatório final de Execução. Lisbon: Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo.
   Google Scholar
• CGD. (2017). O Crescimento Começa nas Cidades | Resumo dos Projetos Financiados 2012/2016. Lisbon: JESSICA Holding Fund Portugal | Fundos de Desenvolvimento Urbano Banco BPI, Caixa Geral de Depósitos e Turismo de Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Chorianopoulos, I., & Iossifides, T. (2006). The neoliberal framework of EU urban policy in action: Supporting competitiveness and reaping disparities. Local Economy, 21(4), 409–422. doi: 10.1080/02690940600951964
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. (2014). Engineering multilevel governance? Joint European support for sustainable investment in city areas (JESSICA) and the involvement of private and financial actors in urban development policy. Regional Studies, 48(12), 2006–2019. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.914625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gregorio Hurtado, S. (2017). Is EU urban policy transforming urban regeneration in Spain? Answers from an analysis of the Iniciativa Urbana (2007–2013). Cities (London, England), 60(A), 402–414. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DGDR. (2002). QCA II Relatório final 1994–1999 – Iniciativa Comunitária URBAN. Lisbon: Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (1997). Towards an urban agenda in the European Union. Communication from the Commission, COM(97) 197, final (06. 05. 97). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (1998). Sustainable urban development in the European Union: A framework for action. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2003). Partnership with the cities. The URBAN community initiative, European Union regional policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2004a). Third report on economic and social cohesion, a new partnership for cohesion convergence competitiveness cooperation. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2004b). Ex-post evaluation of URBAN community initiative. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2007). Fourth report on economic and social cohesion, growing regions, growing Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2009). Promoting sustainable urban development in Europe. Achievements and opportunities, European Union regional policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2010, June). Ex-post evaluation of Cohesion policy programmes 2000–06: The URBAN community initiative. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2012). Investing in regions: Using financial instruments to leverage support for regional policy. Panorama Inforegio, 43, Directorate-General for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2014). The urban dimension of EU policies – Key features of an EU urban agenda. COM (2014) 490 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2016). The state of European cities 2016. Cities leading the way to a better future. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2017). Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. My region, my Europe, our future. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ellin, N. (Ed.). (2006). Integral urbanism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2014). Evidence for a European Urban Agenda. ( Territorial Observation nº13). Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018). Indicators for integrated territorial and urban development ( Working paper). Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M., Kah, S., & Bachtler, J. (2018). Integrated territorial development: New instruments – new results? ( IQ-Net thematic paper 42(2)). Delft: European Policies Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., & Gates, G. (2003). Technology and tolerance: The importance of diversity to high-technology growth. In T. N. Clark (Ed.), The city as an entertainment machine ( Research in urban policy, Vol. 9, pp. 199–219). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Hague, C. (2018). Delivering the new urban agenda through urban and territorial planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(4), 618–622. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2018.1499464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T., & Török, I. (2017). Metropolitan region policies in the European Union: Following national, European or neoliberal agendas? International Planning Studies, 22(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2017.1310652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Galès, P. (2005). Elusive urban policies. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Cities of Europe: Changing contexts, local arrangements, and the challenge to urban cohesion (pp. 233–254). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leipzig Charter. (2007, May 24–25). Leipzig charter on sustainable European cities. Agreed on the occasion of the informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• MacLaran, A., & Kelly, S. (Eds.). (2017). Neoliberal urban policy and the transformation of the city. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (Ed.). (2015). The regional and urban policy of the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2013). Assessing territorial impacts of the EU cohesion policy: The Portuguese case. European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1960–1988. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.813910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2014). The Europeanization of spatial planning processes in Portugal within the EU cohesion policy strategies (1989–2013). Geography and Spatial Planning Journal, 6, 201–222. doi: 10.17127/got/2014.6.012
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2016a). Is there a rise of the territorial dimension in EU Cohesion policy? Finisterra, 103, 89–113. doi: 10.18055/Finis7940
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2016b). Territorial cohesion: An EU concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, 60. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.org/publications/territorial-cohesion-an-eu-concept/
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017). The territorial dimension of European policies: A conceptual approach. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), Uncovering the territorial dimension of European Union cohesion policy (pp. 9–22). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., Zêzere, J. L., & Costa, N. (2016). The EU cohesion fund and spatial planning strategies in transport and risk prevention: Portugal (1995–2013). European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 4(2), 87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, B., & Mckay, S. (2003). Evaluating the social effects of the EU URBAN community initiative programme. European Planning Studies, 11(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/0965431032000072873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outley, N. (ed.). (1998). Cities, economic competition and urban policy. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário, M. R., & Correia, F. N. (2004). Polis—Portuguese programme on urban environment. A contribution to the discussion on European urban policy. European Planning Studies, 12(3), 409–423. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000195001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestana, C., Pinto-Leite, J., & Marques, N. (2009). O Programa Polis como impulsionador da regeneração urbana. 15° Congresso da APDR, Praia City.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, D. (2016). Successful, safe and sustainable cities: Towards a new urban Agenda. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 19(2016), 3–18. Retrieved from https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/cjlg/article/view/5446/5901
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, J. (2017). Impacte do Programa Polis A (re) criação do Espaço Tese de Mestrado. Lisbon: FA ULISBOA.
   Google Scholar
• Stutz, F., & Warf, B. (Eds.). (2012). The world economy. Geography, business, development. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Takano, T. (Ed.). (2003). Healthy cities and urban policy research. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• URBACT. (2014). URBACT III operational programme. European regional development fund 2014–2020. Brussels: European Territorial Cooperation, European Programme for Sustainable Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, M., & Queirós, M. (2005). Ambiente Urbano e Intervenção Pública. Conference Paper, X Congresso Ibérico de Geografia, Évora.
   Google Scholar
• van der Zwet, A., & Bachtler, J. (2018). New implementation mechanisms for integrated development strategies in ESIF. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 1(2008), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• van der Zwet, A., Bachtler, J., Ferry, M., McMaster, I., & Miller, S. (2017). Integrated territorial and urban strategies: how are ESIF adding value in 2014–2020? Final Report, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission.
   Google Scholar