Measuring and comparing planning cultures: risk, trust and co-operative attitudes in experimental games

References

• Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2015). Culture and institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(4), 898–944. doi: 10.1257/jel.53.4.898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. doi: 10.1006/game.1995.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2011). Culture, planning and path dependence: Some reflections on the problems of comparison. Town Planning Review, 82(1), 13–28. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.4
   Google Scholar
• Boxmeer, B. v., & Beckhoven, E. v. (2005). Public–private partnership in urban regeneration: A comparison of Dutch and Spanish PPPs. International Journal of Housing Policy, 5(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/14616710500055612
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Bregman, A. (2016). Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: Trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise. European Planning Studies, 24, 1281–1294. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Galle, M., & Sorel, N. (2011). Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(4), 928–941. doi: 10.1068/a43400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2004). Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies, 97, 55–95. doi: 10.1093/0199262055.003.0003
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (2011). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). Otree—an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah, S.-H., Hoffmann, R., Jones, M., & Williams, G. (2009). An economic anatomy of culture: Attitudes and behaviour in inter- and intra-national ultimatum game experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 732–744. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2009.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2013). The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47(1), 31–65. doi: 10.1007/s11166-013-9170-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Gächter, S. (2010). The science of experimental economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73(1), 122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CULTPLAN. (2007). Cultural differences in European Cooperation. Learning from INTERREG practice Final report of the INTERACT project CULTPLAN (ed. R. During and R. van Dam). Wageningen: Wageningen UR.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, E. (2013). Culture and economics: On values, economics and international business. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Olde, C. (2015). Moving forward comparative planning studies: Beyond planning cultures and institutionalism. Working paper presented at the ISA RC21 Conference The Ideal City: between myth and reality, Urbino, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. (2015). Planning and culture Unfolded: The Cases of Flanders and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2148–2164. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1018406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dethier, P., & Halleux, J.-M. (2014). Production de l'habitat et enjeux territoriaux. Partie 3: Les modes de gestion. Évaluation des mesures cherchant à soutenir la transition vers un nouveau système de production de l’habitat wallon R.I.5: Rapport final dédié aux modes de gestion, CPDT. Rapport de recherche.: Université de Liège.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, O., Gabriel, I., Halleux, J. M., & Michel, Q. (2002). Révision des plans de secteur et mécanismes fonciers en Wallonie: objectifs politiques, outils juridiques et mise en œuvre. Etudes et Documents – CPDT 2, DGATLP, Ministère de la Région wallonne, Namur.
   Google Scholar
• Ernste, H. (2012). Framing cultures of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 87–101. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661194
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. (2015). Formal institutional change and informal institutional persistence: The case of Dutch provinces implementing the spatial planning act. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 428–444. doi: 10.1068/c1391
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E., & Nordahl, B. (2017). The planning system and practice in Norway. In S. Kristjánsdóttir (Ed.), Nordic experiences on sustainable planning (pp. 87–104). Policies and Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2005). The Netherlands: A culture with a soft spot for planning. In B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 285–308). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2010). Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 100(1), 541–556. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.1.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2009). Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of ‘planning processes’? In J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning (pp. 23–38). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gächter, S., Herrmann, B., & Thöni, C. (2004). Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: Survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 505–531. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getimis, P. (2012). Comparing spatial planning systems and planning cultures in Europe. The need for a multi-scalar approach. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
   Google Scholar
• Glumac, B., Han, Q., Schaefer, W., & Van der Krabben, E. (2015). Negotiation issues in forming public–private partnerships for brownfield redevelopment: Applying a game theoretical experiment. Land Use Policy, 47, 66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48. doi: 10.1257/jep.20.2.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halleux, J.-M., Marcinczak, S., & Van der Krabben, E. (2012). The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 887–898. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30(9), 1531–1546. doi: 10.1068/a301531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91, 73–78. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.2.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. (2012). Private sector-led urban development projects: Management, partnerships and effects in the Netherlands and the UK. Delft: TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzmeister, F., & Pfurtscheller, A. (2016). Otree: The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 10, 105–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2016.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höppner, C. (2009). Trust—a monolithic panacea in land use planning? Land Use Policy, 26(4), 1046–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, J., & Van Montfort, A. (2012). Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 121–144. doi: 10.1177/0952076711403026
   Google Scholar
• Kadefors, A. (2004). Trust in project relationships—inside the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 175–182. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00031-0
   Google Scholar
• Keller, D. A., Koch, M., & Selle, K. (1996). ‘Either/or’ and ‘and’: First impressions of a journey into the planning cultures of four countries. Planning Perspectives, 11(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1080/026654396364925
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., & Teisman, G. R. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public—private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money and Management, 23(3), 137–146. doi: 10.1111/1467-9302.00361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (Eds.). (2009). Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Planning culture—a concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2133–2147. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1018404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., & Paddison, R. (2000). Trust and collaborative planning theory: The case of the Scottish planning system. International Planning Studies, 5(2), 205–223. doi: 10.1080/13563470050020194
   Google Scholar
• Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1999). Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. The Economic Journal, 109(453), 25–34. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., & Saglie, I.-L. (2010). Private influence preceding public involvement: Strategies for legitimizing preliminary partnership arrangements in urban housing planning in Norway and Finland. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3), 317–338. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2010.500123
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2016). Dutch land-use planning: The principles and the practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996). Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems and planning projects. Trondheim: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nordahl, B. (2006). Deciding on development. Collaboration between markets and local governments (Doctoral theses). NTNU, 96.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (2003). Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons for experimental research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F. (2014). The concept of planning culture: Analysing how planners construct practical judgements in a culturised context. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 3(2), 1–17. doi: 10.4018/ijepr.2014040101
   Google Scholar
• Read, D. C., & Leland, S. M. (2011). Does sector matter? An analysis of planners’ attitudes regarding politics and competing interests in the planning process. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 639–653. doi: 10.1177/0275074010390031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., & Blotevogel, H. H. (2012). Comparing spatial planning practice in Europe: A plea for cultural sensitization. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659517
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., & Brown, A. (2014). Cultural differences: A cross-cultural study of urban planners from Japan, Mexico, the U.S., Serbia-Montenegro, Russia, and South Korea. Public Organization Review, 14(1), 35–50. doi: 10.1007/s11115-012-0204-9
   Google Scholar
• Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255–277. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free press.
   Google Scholar
• Root, L., Van Der Krabben, E., & Spit, T. (2015). Between structures and norms: Assessing tax increment financing for the Dutch spatial planning toolkit. Town Planning Review, 86(3), 325–349. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2015.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2009). Planners’ role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 65–84. doi: 10.1080/09654310802513948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Personal values in human life. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(9), 630–639. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0185-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsura, D. A. A. (2013). Games and the city. Applying game-theoretical approaches to land and property development analysis (Trail thesis series T).
   Google Scholar
• Samsura, D. A. A., Van der Krabben, E., & Van Deemen, A. (2010). A game theory approach to the analysis of land and property development processes. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 564–578. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsura, D. A. A., Van der Krabben, E., Van Deemen, A., & Van der Heijden, R. (2015). Negotiation processes in land and property development: An experimental study. Journal of Property Research, 32(2), 173–191. doi: 10.1080/09599916.2015.1009846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (Ed.). (2005). Comparative planning cultures. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 255–265. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2012). Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 103–116. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2011.644084
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., De Vries, J., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2015). Planning cultures and histories: Influences on the evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2127–2132. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1016402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, C., & Tait, M. (2007). The crisis of trust and planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 8(2), 229–247. doi: 10.1080/14649350701324458
   Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 413–424. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z. (2013). Rethinking planning culture: A new institutionalist approach. Town Planning Review, 84(6), 683–702. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2013.36
   Google Scholar
• Valtonen, E., Falkenbach, H., & van der Krabben, E. (2017). Risk management in public land development projects: Comparative case study in Finland and the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 62, 246–257. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Krabben, E., & Jacobs, H. M. (2013). Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 774–783. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhage, R. (2002). Induced cooperation in housing development: Comparing housing schemes in four European countries. European Planning Studies, 10(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1080/09654310220121059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woestenburg, A., Van der Krabben, E., & Spit, T. (2018). Land policy discretion in times of economic downturn: How local authorities adapt to a new reality. Journal of Land Use Policy, 77, 801–810. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar