Cross-border cooperation in Europe: a relational perspective

References

• Allmendinger, P., Haughton, G., Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Soft spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating governance: Boundaries and borders. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. J., Klatt, M., & Sandberg, M. (2012). The border multiple: The practicing of borders between public policy and everyday life in a re-scaling Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Border Regions (AEBR). (2018). Cross-border co-operation in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.aebr.eu/en/members/map_of_members.php
   Google Scholar
• Berzi, M. (2017). The cross-border reterritorialization concept revisited: The territorialist approach applied to the case of Cerdanya on the French-Spanish border. European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1575–1596. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1321622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. (2002). States and regions in the European Union: Institutional adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. (2014). Challenges of cross-border spatial planning in the metropolitan regions of Luxembourg and Lille. Planning, Practice & Research, 29(2), 113–132. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2014.896148
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. O. (2005). An emerging European public sphere. European Journal of Social Theory, 3, 341–363. doi: 10.1177/1368431005054798
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2016). The poverty of territorialism: Revisiting European spatial planning. Disp – The Planning Review, 52(3), 73–81. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2016.1235886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke, C. (2014). Grenzüberschreitende Governance in der Raumplanung. Organisations- und Kooperationsformen in Basel und Lille. In S. Grotheer, A. Schwöbel, & M. Stepper (Eds.), Nimm’s sportlich – Planung als Hindernislauf (pp. 62–78). Kaiserslautern: ARL=Arbeitsberichte der ARL 10.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, C. (2015). Spatial governance across borders revisited: Organizational forms and spatial planning in metropolitan cross-border regions. European Planning Studies, 23(5), 849–870. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.887661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getimis, P. (2012). Comparing spatial planning systems and planning cultures in Europe. The need for a multi-scalar approach. Planning, Practice and Research, 27(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Healey, P. (1999). Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 7(5), 623–646. doi: 10.1080/09654319908720542
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The new spatial planning. Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategy spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 14(4), 525–546. doi: 10.1080/09654310500421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidle, K., & Normann, R. H. (2013). Who can govern? Comparing network governance leadership in two Norwegian city regions. European Planning Studies, 21(2), 115–130. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillgruber, C. (2003). Staats- und völkerrechtliche Aspekte grenzüberschreitender Raumplanung. Hannover: ARL=ARL-Arbeitsmaterial.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (2016). Spatial planning in cross-border regions: A systems-theoretical perspective. Planning Theory, 15(1), 68–90. doi: 10.1177/1473095214547149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration, 85, 587–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenath, M. (2008). Exploring the gaps. Sustainability as a challenge for cross-border governance in Central Europe. In M. Leibenath, E. Korcelli-Olejniczak, & R. Knippschild (Eds.), Cross-border governance and sustainable spatial development. Mind the gaps! (pp. 1–11). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. (2011). Contemporary research agendas in border studies: An overview. In D. Wastl-Walter (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies (pp. 33–47). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Nienaber, B. (2018). Grenze als überwindbares Phänomen in der Raumplanung? In M. Heintel, R. Musil, & N. Weixlbaumer (Eds.), Grenzen; Theoretische, konzeptionelle und praxisbezogene Fragestellungen zu Grenzen und deren Überschreitungen (pp. 161–179). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Noferini, A. (2012). The participation of subnational governments in the Council of the EU: Some evidence from Spain. Regional & Federal Studies, 22(4), 361–385. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2012.677138
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, G. (2008). The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, 27(4), 418–438. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, C. (2013). Power topographies in cross-border spatial development policies. In P. Gilles, H. Koff, C. Maganda, & C. Schulz (Eds.), Theorizing borders through analyses of power relationships (pp. 111–123). Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2005). Grenzüberschreitende Raumordnung. In ARL (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Raumordnung (pp. 408–414). Hannover: ARL.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. (2014). Modelling cross-border integration: The role of borders as a resource. Geopolitics, 19(3), 587–608. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2014.913029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, M. (2013). Paradiplomats against the state: Explaining conflict in state and sub-state interest representation in Brussels. Comparative Political Studies, 46(1), 63–94. doi: 10.1177/0010414012453031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar