After the Crash: the conservation-planning assemblage in an era of austerity

References

• Ahlfeldt, G., Holman, N., & Wendland, N. (2012). An assessment of the effects of conservation areas on value. London: LSE, English Heritage, 155.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, G. (1997). Conservation as preservation or as heritage: Two paradigms and two answers. Built Environment, 23(2), 92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, G., & Tunbridge, J. (2000). The tourist-historic city: Retrospect and prospect of managing the heritage city. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., & Healy, C. (2009). Introduction: Assembling culture. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2(1–2), 3–10. doi: 10.1080/17530350903063776
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. (2011). Urban design, regeneration and the entrepreneurial city. Progress in Planning, 76, 63–103. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosma, K. (2010). Heritage policy in spatial planning. In T. Bloemers, H. Kars, & A. V. der Valk (Eds.), The cultural landscape and heritage paradox: Protection and development of the Dutch archaeological-historical landscape and its European dimension, 641–652. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Sorel, N. (2010). Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch planning system. Land Use Policy, 27, 983–989. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (1975). European charter of the architectural heritage. Amsterdam: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (1985). Convention for the protection of the architectural heritage of Europe (Granada Convention). Strasbourg: CoE, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2005). Council of Europe framework convention on the value of cultural heritage for society. Faro: Council of Europe, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, J. B., Nadin, V., Hart, T., Davoudi, S., Pendlebury, J., Vigar, G., … Townshend, T. (2014). Town and country planning in the UK. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J., & Blanco, I. (2017). Austerity urbanism: Patterns of neo-liberalisation and resistance in six cities of Spain and the UK. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(7), 1517–1536. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17701729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012/2019). National planning policy framework. London: DCLG, 65.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Arts, Heritage and Gaelteacht. (2012). Shaping the future: Case studies in adaptation and reuse in historic urban environments. Dublin: Department of Arts, Heritage and Gaelteacht.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs (2016). Part IV of Planning and Development Act (as amended), review of operation ( Report of Expert Advisory Committee). Dublin: DAHRRGA.
   Google Scholar
• DKM Economic Consultants. (2013). Economic strategy for Waterford city and county - final report. Dublin: DKM Economic Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, S., & Nadin, V. (2010). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Delft. (2007). Gezicht op gebouwd erfgoed Detft, Nota monumentenzorg en gebouwd erfgoed 2007–2017. Delft: Gemeente Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Delft. (2012a). Binnenstad Vitaal en Gastvrij: Visie and agenda Binnenstad 2020. Delft. Retrieved from http://www.grachtengebieddelft.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/Binnenstad%20B%26W%20visie%20en%20agenda%202020%20181212.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Delft. (2012b). Bestemmingsplan Binnenstad 2012 ‘Toelichting’ (Chapter 9). Delft. Retrieved from http://www.ruimtelijkeplannen.nl/documents/NL.IMRO.0503.BP0014-2001/t_NL.IMRO.0503.BP0014-2001_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (2018a). National Planning Framework. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (2018b). National Development Plan. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Historic England, The Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers and Institute of Historic Building Conservation. (2017). The ninth report on local authority staff resources. London: HE, ALGAO, IHBC, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Luiten, E., Renes, H., & Rouwendal, J. (2014). Heritage planning and spatial development in the Netherlands: Changing policies and perspectives. International Journal for Heritage Studies, 20(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2012.710852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Luiten, E., Renes, H., & Stegmeijer, E. (2017). Heritage as sector, factor and vector: Conceptualizing the shifting relationship between heritage management and spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1654–1672. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1329410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolen, J., & Renes, J. (2015). Landscape biographies: Key issues. In J. Kolen, J. Renes, & R. Hermans (Eds.), Landscape biographies: Geographical, historical and archaeological perspectives on the production and transmission of landscapes, 21–48. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie, D. (2001). Grainger Town, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. In R. Pickard (Ed.), Management of historic centres (pp. 243–273). London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Magalhaes, C., & Freire Trigo, S. (2017). Contracting out publicness: The private management of the urban public realm and its implications. Progress in Planning, 115, 1–28. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Make It York: Destination Management Organisation. (n.d.). Make it York. York. Retrieved from http://www.makeityork.com
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (1998). Dublin’s Temple Bar—a case study of culture-led regeneration. European Planning Studies, 6(3), 271–281. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720461
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. (2000). Power and policy networks in urban governance: Local government and property-led regeneration in Dublin. Urban Studies, 37(4), 651–672. doi: 10.1080/00420980050003955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., & MacLaran, A. (2001). Changing approaches to urban planning in an ‘entrepreneurial city’: The case of Dublin. European Planning Studies, 9(4), 437–457. doi: 10.1080/713666489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, R. (2005). Identity crisis? Heritage construction, tourism and place marketing in Ireland. In M. McCarthy (Ed.), Ireland's heritages: Critical perspectives on memory and identity, 235–250. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Miele, C. (2005). Conservation and the enemies of progress? In C. Miele (Ed.), From William Morris: Building conservation and the arts and crafts cult of authenticity, 1877–1939 (pp. 1–29). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van OCW. (1999). Belvedere. Beleidsnota over de relatie tussen cultuurhistorie en ruimtelijke inrichting. Den Haag: VNG uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van OCW. (2009). Beleidsbrief Modernisering Monumentenzorg. Den Haag: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van OCW. (2011). Kiezen voor Karakter. Visie erfgoed en ruimte (character in focus). Den Haag: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., van der Toorn Vrijthoff, W., Zhou, J., Arjomand Kermani, A., Mashayekhi, A., Pendlebury, J., … Parkinson, A. (2015). A sustainable future for the historic urban core. Delft: TUD, 24. Retrieved from https://planningandheritage.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/shuc-final-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Negussie, E. (2006). Implications of neo-liberalism for built heritage management: Institutional and ownership structures in Ireland and Sweden. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1803–1824. doi: 10.1080/00420980600838168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ousby, I. (1990). The Englishman’s England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, A., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2015). Negotiating postcolonial legacies: Shifting conservation narratives and residual colonial built heritage in Ireland. Town Planning Review, 86(2), 203–228. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2015.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, A., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2016). Defining “official” built heritage discourses within the Irish planning framework: Insights from conservation planning as social practice. European Planning Studies, 24(2), 277–296. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1077782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, J. (2002). Conservation and regeneration: Complementary or conflicting processes? The case of Grainger Town, Newcastle upon Tyne. Planning Practice and Research, 17(2), 145–158. doi: 10.1080/02697450220145913
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, J. (2009). Conservation in the age of consensus. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, J. (2013). Conservation values, the authorised heritage discourse and the conservation-planning assemblage. International Journal for Heritage Studies, 19(7), 709–727. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2012.700282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendlebury, J., & Strange, I. (2011). Urban conservation and the shaping of the English city. Town Planning Review, 82(4), 361–392. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.23
   Google Scholar
• SAVE Britain’s Heritage. (1978). Preservation pays: Tourism and the economic benefits of conserving historic buildings. London: SAVE.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., Parkinson, A., Redmond, D., & Waldron, R. (2018). Placing heritage in entrepreneurial urbanism: Planning, conservation and crisis in Ireland. Planning Practice & Research, 1–18, Online first. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2018.1430292
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., Redmond, D., & Russell, P. (2012). Active citizenship and local representational politics in twenty-first century Ireland: The role of residents groups within Dublin’s planning arena. European Planning Studies, 20(2), 147–170. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.650905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. (2006). The uses of heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Van Duijn, M., & Rouwendal, J. (2012). Cultural heritage and the location choice of Dutch households in a residential sorting model. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3), 473–500. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldpaus, L., & Pendlebury, J. (2019). Heritage as a vehicle for change: The case of Bigg Market, Newcastle upon Tyne. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. (1998). Selling places: The marketing and promotion of towns and cities 1850–2000. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Waterford City Council. (2011). The Viking triangle: Waterford city centre. Waterford: Waterford City Council and Failte Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013). Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An exploration. Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), 141–159. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699261
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E. (2010). Politics, policy and the discourses of heritage in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. C. C., & Eppink, F. V. (2016). Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage. Ecological Economics, 130, 277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar